By Tiffany Gwee
View the original report done by The Straits Times here
Amid pictures of girls posing sexily while clad in lingerie and flashing lights, the article and video seemed to portray the young women as attention-seeking and “slutty” – to simply put it.
The article focused a lot about the girls’ yearn for popularity and fame – Miss Kylie Ng was quoted to have said that whenever she puts her lingerie photos on Facebook, her friends will call her a “slut” but she would not “give a damn” because she does “what she likes”. She reportedly added, “Even though I lose a lot of friends but I gain a lot of popularity and like… it’s okay.” 
Miss Cynthia Ho was also reported to have mentioned that when she posts pictures of her clad in lingerie on Facebook, a lot of people would start requesting to be her friend. “Guys start talking to you,” Cynthia mentioned.
The pictures below are all stills taken from the video.

pic1468
Still of Amanda talking
pic1489
Still of photographer John having a shoot with the girls
Distortion of Original Interview

However, according to Miss Vanessa Yap who posted under Facebook name ‘Vanny Kitchlynn’ two days ago, the video was “horribly taken out of context” and that it was a “misrepresentation” of what really went on that night of the shoot and interview session.
The original interview was really meant to be a “fun, non-serious interview” about how to protect oneself during shoots when one is not an actual model who have agents but just someone who likes to shoot for fun. She even mentioned that in her interview, she talked about how she protects herself by having a knife with her. This was never mentioned in the published article or video.
Miss Yap even posted screenshots of the conversation between Miss Amanda Wong (the journalist) and photographer John Seah in order to organise a meeting with the girls for a shoot. The message clearly stated that the interview will mainly revolve around the “dangers” of such shoots and how they can be protected.

10268521_1426133464308198_666742307919818408_n                                          (Amanda’s text to the photographer John, one of the model’s friend)

razor                                         (Text message from a person-in-charge from RazorTV)
Substituting Football Jerseys for Lingerie

Miss Yap also mentioned that “all of (the girls) did not want to be in lingerie for (the shoot)” but “it was insisted”. Similarly, Miss Kylie Ng posted a status on Facebook and talked about how they were “supposed to take (the video) with their football jerseys” but RazorTV “insisted” they wear lingerie instead.
This reality is in contrast to the article and how the writer used the word “gamingly” to describe the way Miss Vanessa Tan changed into lingerie. The very reluctance of the girls was completely not brought out in the article.
I watched the ‘Behind-the-scenes’ shoot that was posted on Kylie’s Facebook page and it was true – they really were wearing football jerseys before they were asked to change out of it and into sexy lingerie.

Behind-the-scenes video of interview (taken from Kylie’s Facebook Page)

Cyber-bullied and Hurt
Kylie’s post on Facebook showed much hurt and anger – with English not being her first language, she was not able to communicate her words properly and carefully. The media, unfortunately, took this to their advantage and twisted the meaning of her words.
When she said she loses many friends when she posts in lingerie but “gains popularity”, she actually meant that she does not mind losing the more shallow and superficial friends but gaining more love from her more genuine ones.
I managed to talk to Kylie about the whole situation and she told me that she feels very “depressed” and “betrayed” about the way the media painted her to be.
She also told me that many people are now attacking her online and “cyberbullying her” by constantly insulting and “slamming” her, making her feel even more depressed as she already is.
They apparently tried to write in to ask about the misrepresentation of the article and video but to no avail – no reply was given to the girls.
The Irony of it All
It is ironic then that the interview was originally planned out to discuss about what measures could be taken to protect the girls who take shoots like this as a hobby.
This is because the report has ruined their reputations, which did lead to even more bullying and insulting – the idea of protection and safety then, is no longer relevant in the article.
Interestingly enough, I managed to watch the video (posted on asiaone) on the page two days ago but the video no longer works for me today.
Screen Shot 2014-04-17 at 7.31.20 AM
The video was originally a RazorTV video – which has since been removed from the website as well.

Screen Shot 2014-04-17 at 7.40.20 AM

Cover Photo taken from The Straits Times

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

被断保 截肢老人上诉成功后离世 林瑞莲:“严重伤残”标准何在?

工人党主席林瑞莲,在国会辩论终身护保议题时,揭露一名符合资格的截肢老人,乐龄健保赔付中途被终止,辗转上诉成功后成功续保。可惜这名老人无法继续享有这份福利,在续保不到一月,就与世长辞。 林瑞莲分享,不久前她的选民K先生去世,生前饱受后期肾衰竭折磨,也因糖尿病截肢。然而保险单位以K先生仍有“部分”能力自理六项起居活动,取消了他的乐龄健保赔付。 “K先生后来被转移到临终关怀,保险机构要求他,要重新索赔,仍要填表格上诉。K先生曾在临终关怀中心托我协助,惟他女儿后来填了表格,在医生协助下,让K先生重新领取乐龄健保赔付。可惜不到一个月后,他离开了人世。” 林瑞莲对于如何衡量“伤残”的标准,来决定保户是否符合健保索偿资格感到困惑,特别是政府收了上亿元的保费,但是K先生这样的个案却无法享有保障,如果相同情况也发生在即将落实的终身护保,令人难以接受。 无法自理其中一项,生活就已够困难 方荣發议员也声援林瑞莲,呼吁检讨“严重伤残”定义,特别是降低门槛,让无法自理两项生活起居的保户,也能索赔。 “不要说六项,障友无法自理其中一项,生活都已经面对很大挑战。2018年检讨乐龄健保,倡议扩大保障范围,制定更具包容性的重度伤残定义,岂非合情合理?“ 根据“独立新闻网”报导,K先生的兄弟在社交媒体留言,他们来自低收入家庭,其兄嫂为了哥哥拜访了很多单位,但都以不符合资格为由,拒绝了K先生的援助申请。 乐龄健保计划,已收取33亿元保费,但是只有1亿3千300万元被索偿。至于终身护保将在2020年落实,凡是30岁以上公民都强制性参与,一直付保费到67岁。

Alternative Housing Policy to Boost Total Fertility Rate

SDP Press Release Singapore faces a grave and urgent problem of a…

PAP’s new candidate Ng Ling Ling accused of making a “false claim” about setting up a training institute

On Monday (29 June), a Facebook user named Richard Giam revealed that…

Alternative National Day Celebration at Hong Lim Park

By Terry Xu About 700 people turned up at Hong Lim Park…