This is a follow-up article based on The Guardian Academy’s closure back in late February. Click here to read the original article that was written after the closure.
By Tiffany Gwee
Earlier this month, Jessiy, a parent affected by the closure of The Guardian Academy two months ago wrote in to several ministers and even Prime Minister Mr. Lee Hsien Loong in desperate attempt to find a solution to their problem. She also directly contacted the Police to seek help.
Over 200 Parents Affected by Closure

It was the end of February when the sports academy suddenly came to a close – affecting over 200 parents who signed their children up for the school’s membership. The parents were required to pay a membership fee of S$3000 to S$4200 which entitled them to the academy’s membership till their children turned 18. According to Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE), the highest amount paid by one of the parent totalled up to almost S$12000 for four children.
The parents were unable to stop the GIRO payment because many signed a contract with the bank to pay by installment. CASE stated that little could be done because of the small amount involved in the situation. As according to the NGO, the amount of money involved was too “little” in this incident. Small claims will not be able to help them too because the company is still “registered”.
The academy was established in 2012 and aimed to identify the type of sports children were naturally good in. One of the academy’s directors is former national football player Mr. R Sasikumar.
Appeal to Ministers
In her letter to the Ministers and the Police, she outlined the whole problem the parents were facing with the sudden closure. This included the brief summary of the different meetings they had with Mr. Sasikumar and his lawyer.
After the detailed outlines, she mentions, “Sir, as you can see, we parents have been trying every means and ways to seek justice and fairness however it is sad to know that our country does not protect poor consumers but sly and cunning businessmen.”
She also pointed out that 2 out of the 3 bosses of the company are “totally missing in action”.
Disappointment in the Lack of Consumers Rights

Jessiy also emphasised her disappointment in the lack of protection of consumers in Singapore.
“I am very disappointed with the government and the methods of protecting the people of this country. If one of the Ministers of Singapore was the affected parent, this matter would have been published and the police would have taken control of this matter. It clearly shows that we, citizens, are not taken seriously and protected.”
Police’s Inability to Interfere with Civil Law
In reply to her email, Mr. Wee Chai Meng of the Singapore Police Force said that he “felt sorry for the experience that (she) and the other parents have encountered with The Guardian Academy”. However, he mentioned that after “carefully reviewing the facts”, they found the case to be “civil in nature”.
The Police then clearly stated that they “will not be taking any action”. The reply added that even if the Police does not take action, it “does not negate (her) right to seek civil recourse to recover your loss”.
This is despite the fact that in the email Jessiy already clearly stated that the parents involved are “merely middle class citizens who are not able to take a lawyer and fight this case as more money will be spent”.
Upon receiving the Police’s reply, Jessiy immediately forwarded it to Mr. Lee Hsien Loong and questioned the effectiveness of the Police Force.
This is a simple example that our police force expects, citizens, to resolve our matter by appointing a lawyer. It is very obvious that the government does not care for us but expects us to spend more money.”
As of 17 April, no reply has been received by the Prime Minister’s office nor any of the ministers.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Record number of closure of private schools in 2016, but world renowned schools too?

I refer to the article “Private school closures in Singapore hit record…

Low-income, vulnerable individuals will be proactively identified to help tide them over uncertain times amid COVID-19 pandemic

In order to help low-income and vulnerable Singaporeans go through the current…

研究显示调高公积金缴交率益处多 网民斥恐加剧年长雇员觅职困境

本地主流媒体《联合早报》报导,一项研究指若55岁至64岁员工的公积金缴交率保持和年轻人一样,那10年间就能累积超过14万元,能提高年长者工作意愿,他们的公积金入息甚至足于缴交房贷。 但是网民们对此的反应似乎一面倒,表示难以接受,因为提高公积金缴交率不仅减少了现有的可动用资金,甚至会让年长雇员更难觅得工作,因为雇主的公积金缴交率也提高了。 这项由新加坡政策研究所演技研究员进行的模拟推算发现,若是将55岁至64岁员工的公积金保持和55岁之前一样,他们的退休储蓄可在10年内累积超过14万元,退休后的每月入息也会因此增加超过一倍。 这项由该研究所高级研究员余国安和副研究员黄锐洲展开的研究,假设一名员工在55岁后的公积金缴交率保持和年轻员工一样,那么在从55岁到64岁之间,其普通和特别户头储蓄能够在这10年间累积多少。 终身入息可增加150巴仙 有关的研究以人力部公开的数据,估算了55岁到59岁员工的大概月薪金额后进行推算,发现最低和最高的第10个百分位的员工,能够累积到3万1056元至14万5117元。研究人员推算发现员工在10年内,累积的储蓄能增加三倍,月薪处于第20个百分位的员工,储蓄从2万5610元增加到6万6524元;处于中位数的员工的储蓄从5万1557元增加到13万3923元。 如果将这些额外储蓄纳入公积金终身入息计划(CPF LIFE)中,月薪处于第20个百分位的员工在65岁起,每月能领的入息将从166元增加到414元,增幅约150巴仙;月薪处于中位数的员工每月入息,也将从326元增至777元,增幅为140巴仙。 他们也发现若只是把缴交率提高一个百分比,处于第20个百分位的员工也能够在10年期间多存约5000元,每个月的公积金终身入息能多领33元。 一次性调高或需累进元素 本地年长员工的公积金缴交率曾于1988年、1993年和1999年,在面对金融危机时进行下调,确保他们在经济萧条时段能够保住工作。缴交率虽然在之后有所恢复,但是55岁之后的缴交率仍然不如年轻员工。 目前55岁以下员工的公积金缴交率为月薪的37巴仙,雇主17巴仙及雇员20巴仙;55岁到60属于的缴交率为26巴仙,雇主和雇员各13巴仙;60岁到65岁为16.5巴仙,雇主9巴仙和雇员7.5巴仙;以及65岁及以上的缴交率为12.5巴仙,雇主7.5巴仙而雇员5巴仙。…

【武汉冠状病毒】第219例确诊病患为盛港消防员

根据民防部队消息,盛港消防局一名消防员也确诊感染武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)。 对比卫生部资料,第219例是30岁男公民,和142及211例有关联。第211例是35岁菲律宾籍女子,也是长期探访准证持有者,与早前的第142例(26岁男公民,曾前往Aperia商场攀岩)有关联。 上述消防员近期未到过境外感染重灾区,他是在本月13日出现症状,就被立即送到盛港医院急诊部,最后在15日早上确诊。 在入院前,除了到盛港消防局上班,也曾到过MEIBAN塑膜制造公司和富丽华河滨酒店(Furama Riverfront)。他住在位于碧山22街的住处。 该名职员也是今日新确诊的第236例(30岁女公民)家属。 据了解,当局已命令与上述消防员有接触的通辽进行居家隔离,民防部队也对设施进行消毒。该名消防员目前仍在盛港综合医院接受治疗。