By Tiffany Gwee
In a recent speech by the Workers’ Party earlier this month, Mr. Yee Jenn Jong brought up the topic of integrated schools and urged MOE to “study the feasibility to pilot” schools that let children go straight to Secondary school instead of having to go through the stress of the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE). 
“I am glad that other honourable members like Mr Laurence Lien and Ms Denise Phua have also made similar calls.”
Yee also talked about how while there are parents who will “want a competitive system for their children” to enter “what they believe as the best schools”, there are others like himself who would rather have their children go through primary and secondary education without PSLE. “The brand of schools had not mattered to me,” Yee mentioned, “Such an integrated system is available in many countries, including those that have fared well in education benchmarks. This choice is not available here.”
Abolishing PSLE was one of the issues that was highlighted in the recent ‘Our Singapore Conversation’ and has recently been debated with the rising stress amongst primary school children today. Amid seemingly impossible math questions and truckload of money spent on tuition, this initiative might allow an alleviation of stress on both the students and parents.
What happens after implementation?

With regards to this, Senior Minister Ms. Indranee Rajar questioned the feasibility of this plan to scrape PSLE as a whole – “If you didn’t do it according to grades, how would you do it?”
She analysed different methods and its issues, including how if MOE decides to do it by distance, then it would not be fair to those who scored higher but lived further from their desired school. “The real angst about PSLE is the pressure,” she wrote, “the answer would be to try and make sure that across the board every school is a good school.”
Learning Support Programmes
Ms. Indranee also spoke about the Learning Support Programmes in schools to help those who cannot cope with schoolwork or cannot afford tution. “MOE’s view is that it shouldn’t be the case that because you cannot afford tuition you should not be able to pass your exam, which is why we introduced the Learning Support Programmes.”
In general, she felt that having no PSLE does not mean no more pressure or stress as there are other factors to consider as well even with the implementation of such integrated schools.
Change of mindset
Perhaps it may be time to think about what exactly is causing the often-unnecessary stress accumulated in children as young as 7 – is it really only about the difficulty faced by the students or is it also the overly high expectations that parents set for their own children too?
I often come across parents who only want their kids to attend the “best schools” or “elite schools” or children who have tuition virtually every single day. This, together with extra enrichment and supplementary lessons in schools, is definitely too taxing for a young child. They might eventually not be able to handle the stress and break down from it, causing more undesired trauma to be inflicted upon them.
There is a need to alter the mindsets of society (parents, to be more specific) – for them to be more accepting towards their child’s strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone is blessed with a naturally academically inclined mind but over time, they might soon discover their own talents. With their child only at a tender age of 7 to 12, self-discovery and learning is of utmost importance. Not every child will come to realise their talent from such a young age.
Ultimately, education is a journey (that can be long, short, easy, arduous or a mix of everything) to find out more about an individual’s niche areas and interests that best suit them.
Easier said than done

Be it there will be schools with completely no PSLE or not, the type of stress the children face will not lessen unless there is a change of perception coming from people in society. So, if stress is the problem, then creating a more accepting environment for the children might just be able to lessen the pressure.
Indeed, it is easier said than done. It may take some time to get used to the “new” idea of embracing each child’s talent but it is doable only with more effort from the authorities and from the parents.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

AGC appeals against decision in by-election case

~ By Gangasudhan ~ The Attorney-General has just filed a Notice of…

抨击政府在暖化议题沉默 环卫青年吁体制变革因应气候危机

我国于9月21日发起新加坡气候集会(SG Climate Rally)吁求政府在应对气候危机上采取更有力的措施,其中由年仅23岁的环卫人士何翔天(Ho XiangTian译音)在慷慨激昂的致辞中,呼吁新加坡应该在这场对抗气候的抗争上采取激烈的措施,为求改变。 此次集会成功在芳林公园举行,吸引近两千群众出席,也是在我国首次举办的气候集会。尽管当天空气质量不佳,仍有许多人到场支持活动,且多以年轻人为主。 何翔天在致辞中断言,单靠个人行动是不足以改变气候变化的,他表示,“我们需要体制上的变革因应气候危机,所以我们需要政府和企业来采取行动,让他们听得到我们的声音。” 他也指出,碳排放量多数产出于工业,其排放量达六成,但却要求家庭(仅占7.4巴仙)要响应环保,减少碳排放量,所以也直言该要求相当不合理。 何也在致辞中直指近年我国气候变化事故,政府2012年开始经营第一座燃煤电厂;2013年,新加坡经历了有史以来最严重的烟霾;再来2014年开发了裕廊岩洞(Jurong Rock Caverns),间接增加了我国碳排放量;尽管于2015年通过了《巴黎协定》(Paris Agreement)但仍无法将气温控制在2度以内。 再者,他也提及2016年的大规模珊瑚白化事件与2017年捷运隧道发生洪水事件,足以证明政府的因应措施并不凑效;2018年碳税,原被提议为每吨10至20元,但随后却大幅下调至每吨5元;而今年,总理李显龙更宣布政府预计在未来100年内投入1000亿新元,以因应海平面上升的问题。…

【选举】人民党出战波东巴西和碧山-大巴窑

本届大选也迎来引人注目的提名日,提名程序是从上午11点开始,中午12点30分结束。提名结果尘埃落定,来自11个政党的192名候选人角逐31个选区,共计93个议席,逾265万名选民都有机会投下神圣一票。 人民党也在提名日前宣告将会出战波动巴西单选区和碧山-大巴窑集选区。目前波动巴西将由人民党主席乔立盟单枪匹马上阵,对垒人民行动党的司徒宇斌。 而碧山-大巴窑集选区的部分则有人民党秘书长谢镜丰率领,成员包括邱永豪、欧斯曼(Osman Sulaiman)、Williamson Lee(李健铨),对战人民行动党的黄永宏、徐芳达、钟奇雄、安迪。

YP – reigniting the “voice of a generation”

A video by the youth wing of the ruling People’s Action Party…