By Tiffany Gwee
In a recent speech by the Workers’ Party earlier this month, Mr. Yee Jenn Jong brought up the topic of integrated schools and urged MOE to “study the feasibility to pilot” schools that let children go straight to Secondary school instead of having to go through the stress of the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE). 
“I am glad that other honourable members like Mr Laurence Lien and Ms Denise Phua have also made similar calls.”
Yee also talked about how while there are parents who will “want a competitive system for their children” to enter “what they believe as the best schools”, there are others like himself who would rather have their children go through primary and secondary education without PSLE. “The brand of schools had not mattered to me,” Yee mentioned, “Such an integrated system is available in many countries, including those that have fared well in education benchmarks. This choice is not available here.”
Abolishing PSLE was one of the issues that was highlighted in the recent ‘Our Singapore Conversation’ and has recently been debated with the rising stress amongst primary school children today. Amid seemingly impossible math questions and truckload of money spent on tuition, this initiative might allow an alleviation of stress on both the students and parents.
What happens after implementation?

With regards to this, Senior Minister Ms. Indranee Rajar questioned the feasibility of this plan to scrape PSLE as a whole – “If you didn’t do it according to grades, how would you do it?”
She analysed different methods and its issues, including how if MOE decides to do it by distance, then it would not be fair to those who scored higher but lived further from their desired school. “The real angst about PSLE is the pressure,” she wrote, “the answer would be to try and make sure that across the board every school is a good school.”
Learning Support Programmes
Ms. Indranee also spoke about the Learning Support Programmes in schools to help those who cannot cope with schoolwork or cannot afford tution. “MOE’s view is that it shouldn’t be the case that because you cannot afford tuition you should not be able to pass your exam, which is why we introduced the Learning Support Programmes.”
In general, she felt that having no PSLE does not mean no more pressure or stress as there are other factors to consider as well even with the implementation of such integrated schools.
Change of mindset
Perhaps it may be time to think about what exactly is causing the often-unnecessary stress accumulated in children as young as 7 – is it really only about the difficulty faced by the students or is it also the overly high expectations that parents set for their own children too?
I often come across parents who only want their kids to attend the “best schools” or “elite schools” or children who have tuition virtually every single day. This, together with extra enrichment and supplementary lessons in schools, is definitely too taxing for a young child. They might eventually not be able to handle the stress and break down from it, causing more undesired trauma to be inflicted upon them.
There is a need to alter the mindsets of society (parents, to be more specific) – for them to be more accepting towards their child’s strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone is blessed with a naturally academically inclined mind but over time, they might soon discover their own talents. With their child only at a tender age of 7 to 12, self-discovery and learning is of utmost importance. Not every child will come to realise their talent from such a young age.
Ultimately, education is a journey (that can be long, short, easy, arduous or a mix of everything) to find out more about an individual’s niche areas and interests that best suit them.
Easier said than done

Be it there will be schools with completely no PSLE or not, the type of stress the children face will not lessen unless there is a change of perception coming from people in society. So, if stress is the problem, then creating a more accepting environment for the children might just be able to lessen the pressure.
Indeed, it is easier said than done. It may take some time to get used to the “new” idea of embracing each child’s talent but it is doable only with more effort from the authorities and from the parents.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Gov't and media "glossed over" S'pore history, says undergraduate

In a report in the Straits Times on Saturday, 20 September, undergraduate…

同一笔账竟报销两次! 居委会前高级经理遭判监12周

巴西立居民委员会(RC)一名前选区高级经理,被指同一笔帐却向两个区的居委会主席报销两次,他对两项欺诈控状认罪,被判监禁12周,其他两项控状尚待酌量。 37岁的李轩伟(译音),声称自己自掏腰包支付活动供应商的费用。原本在获得第七区居委会主席签署支票、付款后,再转向第八区副主席申请报销!他为此获得四张支票总值5千919.27元的款项。 李轩伟是在2008年3月加入人民协会成为选区经理,较后升任巴西立第七区和第八区的居委会高级经理。不过目前已不在居委会任职。 2015年10月,建屋发展局协同巴西立-榜鹅市镇会,以及该区居委会着手社区翻新计划,改善选区内的设施。计划是获得政府全额拨款的,由市镇会落实。 翻新计划必须征求75巴仙居民同意,而第七、八区居委会便负责办活动向居民讲解计划细节,寻求支持。 李轩伟在2018年3月3日办了一场一日活动,他联系供应商并准备付款凭单、支票等证明文件,在获得第七区居委会主席签署支票后,便付款给供应商。 然而,李轩伟之后又再拿同样的付款凭单,欺瞒第八区居委会副主席拉吉夫(Rajeev Divakaran Nair),自己是自掏腰包先支付供应商,而二度申请报销! 他在2018年4月19日,欺瞒拉吉夫自己支付了气球造型商504元、购买袋子1千016元。拉吉夫信以为真,便支付他共1千521元。 同年7月4日,李轩伟又欺瞒拉吉夫,声称自己支付一笔2199元的款项,又再索求报销。 当然事件最后东窗事发,巴西立东选区办公室在同年4月查账时,发现这起欺瞒行为,该区总监找李轩伟对质,后者终于承认在第七区和第八区都做了两次重复报销,最终总监决定报警揭发此事。…

【选举】致力打造友善育儿社会 许金桂政策应适时改变

许金桂认为我们应该依循时代变化,制定适时政策,打造能让父母安心照顾孩子的社会和国家。 工人党马林百列集选区候选人之一的许金桂在进行网上演讲时指出,我国对有意育儿夫妇所制定的政策尚有不足,去年就有过半父亲没有领取陪产假,而且很多家庭都无法获得足够的援助。 因此,该党认为可以加强现有的共享育儿假计划,将产假和陪产假合二为一;将育儿假延长到24周;给予妇女同额托儿补贴;加速外国配偶的长期探访准证入籍申请,提供特别通道。

【冠状病毒19】酷航确认飞天津航班 竟有13人确诊感染!

从新加坡去往中国天津的酷航一趟航班,13名乘客被检测出感染冠状病毒19!其中11名乘客相信是在建筑行业工作,被检测时均无症状。 日前社交媒体微信中的一篇文章揭露,来自新加坡酷航TR138班机中,有13人确诊感染冠状病毒19。 13人中均为男性,约40至50岁左右,当时并无症状,而且体温也在摄氏36.5度左右。 不过,他们在做核酸检测时被确诊,随后被送往当地医院。 这些员工均从事建筑行业,只有在人力部确认没有感染病毒后,才获准回国,即指他们可能是在早前接受拭子检测呈阴性,或冠病康复患者。 目前复工的客工必须进行每14天例行检测一次,作为预防措施,一旦发现确诊将会再次被隔离,而且不允许离开新加坡,直至痊愈。 已通报卫生部 酷航也确认此事,指目前已接获中国当局的消息。该班机共有223人,在酷航接获通知后,也向我国卫生部通报。 所有相关飞行人员,包括空服员和机师也将会在未来14日内停止所有工作,并紧密留意自己的身体状况。 酷航也表示,自恢复航班飞行后,酷航也在所有航班上採取了额外的安全措施。 除了广为人知的安全措施如分配座位、登记前的体温检测和飞行中必须强制戴口罩。乘客在登机前也需填写健康声明,包括告知呼吸道感染的任何症状。 机组人员在执勤时也必须佩戴适当的个人防护设备,包括口罩和面罩。…