A total of ten animal welfare groups (AWGs) submitted an open letter to Minister of Defence, Dr Ng Eng Hen and Minister of National Development, Mr Khaw Boon Wan to ask for the case of alleged animal abuse in Pasir Ris Camp to be reviewed.
Early this year in January  a full-time National Serviceman (NSF) witnessed two incidents of alleged animal abuse against stray dogs in his camp by his senior officers – a Lieutenant Colonel and a Warrant Officer. As he was emotionally affected by the actions, he then sent a video clip of one of these dogs shown to be tied up to a local Animal Welfare Group, the Animal Lovers League (ALL) in a bid to seek help for the captured dog. A huge online furor happened after the video went viral.  The NSF’s identity was revealed to Ministry of Defence (Mindef) and was given 21 days stoppage of leave as punishment for taking video in camp. (story)
Agriculture and Veterinary Authority (AVA) conducted a preliminary examination and announced that there were no signs of animal abuse without providing details of the process of the said examination. The Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) stated that it would conduct an investigation into the matter and does not condone animal abuse by its soldiers.
The AWGs pointed out the anonymity of the complainant was not only unprotected but exposed by the investigators, compromising the NSF’s status in camp. It was reported that MINDEF claimed that the parent’s account of promises by SAF was “unfounded.
Recommendations by the Animal Welfare Groups
The AWGs recommend that the parameters of animal abuse to be redefined and they opine that the conduct of the assessment of the definition of “unnecessary pain or suffering” has negated the psychological distress that the video-graphed dog was subjected to, under the hands of the officers involved. 
The AWGs also recommend that starting with this dog abuse incident, relevant AWG(s) can be included into the animal abuse investigation process with a special investigation committee with representative from both the AVA and a recognized AWG to be formed for every case of animal abuse. All the members of this collective has volunteered as a potential representative in such a committee.
They also seek the invitation of AWGs on the early management of animals in SAF camp complexes. They pointed out that although there had been an increase in the number of cases of dog attacks by its personnel but the camp had chosen to suffer one alleged dog bite attack after another until the reported 5th report, before choosing to take action.
The group noted that if the camp could have issued an immediate call for help to AWGs like ALL or ASD or SOSD after the first incident, the subsequent incidents would not have occurred.
It is further recommended that the SAF considers the adoption of new stray management protocol that includes humane handling of animals deemed to be of threat to camp safety, avoiding  unnecessary distress to NSFs witnessing officers treating animals in an untrained, allegedly inhumane manner.
Open Letter by the AWGs to the two ministries.
Collective appeal to review the case of alleged animal abuse in Pasir Ris Camp

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

蔡厝港组屋现中国国旗案: 警表示着手调查 吁知情者提供消息

蔡厝港组屋出现中国国旗案,警方表示正在着手调查,呼吁知情民众提供消息。 日前蔡厝港组屋通道上悬挂中国国旗,被市镇通报警方。警方接获通报后,着手进行调查。 该旗帜周一(5日)被发现挂在蔡厝港5道第489B座组屋、介于11楼和12楼之间的楼梯口,被居民拍照上传至本地社交平台Stomp网站。 据了解,警方已在部分12楼组屋中贴上告示,表示任何知情民众可随时与警方联系。不过当地一些民众反映,并不清楚旗帜何时被放上去,而其目的为何。 市镇会表示目前该案已交由警方处理,对此无可奉告。 根据《国徽(显示管制)法》规定,公共场合展示任何非新加坡国旗或国徽者,均属违法行为。一旦公众在任何地点可看见有关国旗/国徽,将被视为是公开展示。犯罪者或将面临最高6个月监禁或500新元罚款,或两者兼施。 但该法亦有例外条件,包括外交代表在政府授权下,展示他国国旗或国徽,并允许在船上或飞机上展示。  

Stepping forward – Part 1

In an exclusive interview with The Online Citizen, four former Reform Party…

“滥用泼马法企图噤声异见” 马律师组织不遵循更正指示

今早(22日),内政部援引《防假消息法》(POFMA),要求马国捍卫自由律师团(LHL)、《网络公民》、雅虎新闻以及新闻工作者韩俐颖,发出更正指示。 事缘内政部指责捍卫自由律师团,在本月16日的新闻稿作出不实指控,称樟宜监狱以残酷和不合法方式处决囚犯。 不过,捍卫自由律师团也很快在今日作出回应,声称坚持立场,且扬言不遵守新加坡政府发出的更正指示,并要求撤回。 文告坚称樟宜监狱内确实曾发生残酷行刑、且若绞绳断裂,则朝囚犯的脖子后方使劲踢断。并指他们的声明是来自前任和现任监狱官员的证据。 “试图干预马国公民在自家土地发言自由” 同时,该律师组织董事梅丽莎(Melissa Sasidaran)也抨击,近期才生效的《防假消息法》备受争议,是欠缺民主和压迫式的法律,国际上都指责该法被用于钳制异见。 “再者,新方对在马国土地发文告的组织,用《防假消息法》发出更正指示,是令人愤慨和无法接受的。新方无权干预马国公民在自家土地发声明的言论自由。” 梅丽莎认为新加坡内政部的做法无疑是要让该组织噤声,避免处决方式的真相公开;他揶揄新加坡政府应学会接受批评。 “他们对于真相和事实没有独断权。这种尝试把管辖权力延伸到马国公民身上的做法,是挑衅、非法的,也违反国际法。” 内政部驳斥指控 内政部驳斥,捍卫自由律师团作出不实指控;并强调政府不遗余力确保执法严格遵守法律程序,而执刑也都有监狱长或一名医生在场等。…

李显扬:先打倒冠病19 选举须暂缓

(翻译自李显扬刊载于《马来邮报》的评论) 基于冠状病毒19 本地传播病例已超过入境病例,新加坡目前已启动“断路器”式的半封锁措施。本月3日,总理李显龙称关闭学校、非必要服务商店和工作场所的措施,旨在防堵感染传播。 经过数周的担忧后,许多国人终于松了一口气,当局采取更严谨措施来保护他们免受病毒侵害。然而,仍然有强烈的感觉,在这场健康危机的关键时刻,国家的关注重心被迫分散。 4月7日,当国人将在“阻断”措施下准备呆在家里,人民行动党(PAP)却将在国会推动通过《国会选举(冠病19特别安排)法案》。 这法案似乎显示,行动党把它和李总理的利益凌驾于家国之上。执政党似乎仍执迷于在还有整整一年任期的情况下,如何在疫情下召开选举,更何况世卫组织(WHO)已宣称这场疫情为“您能想象到的最强劲敌”。 敦促国人“相信自己为国家利益而非个人”,但李总理却无法放下即将举行的选举,令人莫名其妙。 既然行动党不太可能败选,为何那么焦急于选举?难道是畏惧经济衰退的恶果?需提出的问题是:政府是否过于被动或做得太少,只是为了避免惊动人民或限制对经济的损失?有多大程度因为提早选举的渴望而分神? 当前,新加坡理应得到总理和他团队的全盘关注,对那些每日面对感染风险的前线医护人员,予以尊重。然而, 当新感染群仍在涌现,执政党却把宝贵的时间精力都浪费在选举安排上。 新加坡应对疫情的手法获得世界赞许,也提及过去2003年SARS疫情习得许多宝贵经验。SARS疫情时,出现首位病患的26天后,就关闭学校。但这一次,自1月23日出现首宗病例以来,过了70天才关闭。这就不能怪国人的质疑:如果SARS是一场教训,何以会出现如此过度的拖延? SARS疫情出现238例确诊病例。但今年4月1日冠病19确诊人数就破千,截至4日已达到1114例。这可不同于其他战疫。冠病19比起SARS更具传染力,感染链也极其困难打破。为提早选举分心,行动党是否失察?国人是否感受到政府有把公民的福祉摆在首位?…