By Howard Lee
How much would you pay to have faeces in your coffee? $35? $100? Or maybe, the life of an innocent animal that is forced to eat only coffee beans to fuel a lucrative novelty trade?
TOC got in touch with Henrietta Woo from Project LUWAK SG, a locally-born group dedicated to increasing awareness about the cruelty of farmed kopi luwak, and in the process save the common palm civet from, literally and figuratively, a whole load of crap.
Tell us a bit more about your group – who you are and how you came together.
We are Project LUWAK SG Singapore, a group whose objective is to raise awareness of the cruelty behind kopi luwak (civet poop coffee) among both coffee retailers and consumers. Our focus is on outreach and education, which sees us being active on social media, blogging, writing to coffee retailers as well as establishing partnerships. The ‘LUWAK’ in our name stands for ‘Love oUr Wild civets, Avoid Kopi luwak’ which we think nicely sums up our stance towards kopi luwak from caged civets. If kopi luwak beans were sourced from the faeces of wild civets, and if there were a certification body to guarantee assurance, we wouldn’t have an issue with it.
Project LUWAK SG was formed very recently, in October 2013. It all started when my mum told me that a local coffee house was selling kopi luwak as its signature drink. It prompted me to do a quick search online and I found that kopi luwak was starting to gain popularity in Singapore. Deciding to pursue the matter, I sought out Xu Weiting and Fung Tze Kwan, who are both common palm civet researchers in Singapore, for their advice. Like-minded friends Chloe Tan, Germaine Leng, Joys Tan, Pearlynn Sim, Esther Wee, Mary-Ruth Low, Fahmi Samsuri, Gladys Chua, Sofina Ng joined shortly after.
I know there is some long history behind it, but very briefly – kopi luwak, what is this about?
Kopi luwak is said to be an innovation by native farmers and plantation workers in the Dutch colony of Java in the 1690s. They were prohibited from picking coffee cherries for personal consumption. This problem was circumvented when they observed undigested coffee beans in poop left behind by civets that had wandered into the estate to feed on coffee cherries. Harvested, washed and dried, the first cup of kopi luwak was made. Apparently, after word got out, the wild-sourced kopi luwak became much sought after and fetched a premium even then – owing to the difficulty in obtaining it as well as the limited supply.
Fast forward to the present: a former coffee trader from Britain, Tony Wild, introduced the West to kopi luwak in 1991, and it suddenly catapulted into international fame. To meet increasing demand, kopi luwak farms would cage wild civets and feed them an exclusive diet of coffee berries, which is not what civets normally eat in the wild. Needless to say, the impact on the environment and the health of the civets is clearly negative.
Wild actually started a campaign recently to try to put an end to it. Around the same time, an impactful BBC documentary entitled ‘Coffee’s Cruel Secret’ was aired.
What made you want to embark on this campaign?
Looking back to October 2013, I remember feeling riled up upon realising that kopi luwak was taking root in Singapore. At the same time, I wondered whether I had the ability to change things. Kopi luwak was something that was created, and it was okay at first being wild-sourced and all. Then caging civets with the purpose of farming started because demand soared, driven by curious customers.
Personally, I think if consumers knew what went into making kopi luwak they would be less likely to touch it. We think that the great hype over kopi luwak is mainly due to its novelty. It received the lowest cupping score (evaluation of the taste and aroma of brewed coffee) by the Specialty Coffee Association of America when ranked against several regular coffees. Also, it would probably put a sizable dent in someone’s ego to admit to shelling out good money for awful-tasting coffee made from poop, so the myth (in our opinion) that it is a great coffee is perpetuated.
If consumers already know what goes into making it and still want to drink it, it’s really their choice in the end. But the first step is in raising awareness and hence Project LUWAK SG’s focus is on outreach and education.
You must have gotten this often: Why bother with civets, when they do not affect our daily lives at all?
Actually, TOC is the first to ask us this. The typical species used in making kopi luwak, the common palm civet, can be found in Singapore and it is our last wild urban carnivore. They occupy important ecological roles such as seed dispersal – which local research is investigating (see here and here) – that aid in keeping the ecosystem functioning. Though we don’t rely on the natural environment directly in Singapore (e.g. for food), we derive other benefits from it such as the purification of air, regulation of climate – which require a healthy ecosystem.
Nature is resilient but removal of any one component does affect its ability to function. Hence, it is more correct to say that civets do not affect our daily lives directly, rather than “at all”. Conversely, as consumers, through our choices, we can directly make a difference to the welfare of civets.
Is civet-poop coffee very prevalent in Singapore? What’s our impact on the international trade as a whole?
I’ll focus on the consumption as production is non-existent in Singapore. While kopi luwak is not widely sold in storefronts here, the online market appears to be sizable. And this is not surprising as our spending power puts us in the market share for which kopi luwak is pitched at. It is expensive, but the majority here can afford it.
Singaporeans also travel frequently and our tourist dollars go some way in supporting kopi luwak. Visits to neighbouring countries such as Indonesia and the Philippines – top exporters of kopi luwak – often involve some form of exposure to it, whether at a tasting session (typically included in tours) or a souvenir shop. As a whole, we are definitely driving demand which fuels the trade but to what extent remains unknown. There are no exact figures, but I would say that our potential to drive market forces is high.
What’s the reaction you get when you tell people about it?
Most people whom we have told have heard about kopi luwak and are curious about it. Others are repulsed. One thing in common across the two groups is that most of the time they do not know how cruel caged-sourced kopi luwak is. After we tell them about it, they get quite mortified. I guess they would eventually become detractors of kopi luwak, if not immediately.
On the other hand, we have encountered ardent kopi luwak supporters who maintain that they get their beans from wild civets. Unfortunately, there is no way at present to prove this as a certification body does not yet exist.
You have day jobs? Because I see you getting a lot of hate mail, but not likely many cheques.
About half of us are working, while the rest are university students. We currently operate with zero funding. Our car decals were kindly sponsored by SKL0. These sport our logo, which was designed by a friend and volunteer, Sharon Bong. Also a volunteer at first, Esther – who’s behind the infographics – has now joined the team as our resident artist. We welcome collaboration from interested parties to join us in raising awareness!
What do you hope to achieve with this campaign, and what progress have you made so far towards your goal? Share your ups and downs.
We hope that people, coffee retailers and consumers alike, will sit up and take notice of the ills of kopi luwak and act for civets. Through this campaign, we also want to encourage consumers to not drink and/or purchase kopi luwak as well as for retailers to not sell or endorse it. We also hope that our efforts will contribute to the larger objective of raising awareness about animal welfare and exploitation.
Coincidentally, later in the same month we were formed, an article was published in Shin Min about two local cafes that have decided to stop selling kopi luwak (English translation here). This breakthrough was the result of investigations and pressure from the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA Asia). All of us hope that more coffee retailers will follow their lead in time to come.
Animal welfare groups such as Project: WILD, Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA; Hong Kong, Selangor and Singapore), and the Animal Concerns Research & Education Society (ACRES) have since picked up our infographics and shared them. SPCA Hong Kong kindly translated the infographics into Chinese which will enable a wider reach.
A few days’ back, a collaboration with Jonna Lehtinen, a primate researcher in Bali, was forged. She is helping to distribute the infographics at main tourist sites/restaurants, and there are also indications of interest to circulate it in other parts of Indonesia. Locally, we were featured in The Straits Times’ Causes Week 2013 and will soon embark on a collaborative effort with Nanyang Girls’ High School. I think it’s an understatement to say that these are exciting times ahead.  The road ahead may be long, but we’re slowly increasing our reach and are buoyed by the support from new partnerships.
What are the next steps for your group?
The next steps would be to sustain interest by engaging our audience with new material, stepping up efforts to establish ties with coffee retailers in Singapore, and to seek out new partnerships.
What can the guy on the street do to help you?
He/she can check out our blog and Facebook page to learn more about the cruelty behind kopi luwak and spread the word about it. We would also appreciate having ‘extra’ eyes and ears on the ground i.e. let us know if kopi luwak is being sold in Singapore or even write directly to the person(s) involved. Also take our pledge to say ‘no’ to kopi luwak!

For more information, contact the Project LUWAK SG team:

 Image from Wikipedia
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

That we may dream again – book review by Chee Siok Chin

“These extracts may be frightening to those who are already afraid.”

【冠状病毒19】逾万员工尚未接受常规检测

建设局指出,还有1万3000名员工还未获得雇主安排进行冠状病毒19常规检测(RRT),而当局自6月开始已检查了超过2500个工地,发现每十个工地中就有一个仍需加强防疫措施。 在人力部、建设局、经济发展局和保健促进局于9月7日发出的联合文告指出,截止9月6日,有1万3000名员工未获得安排进行常规检测,因此他们在SGWorkPass应用程序中的“通行码”(AccessCode)仍然维持在红色,即无法工作。 四单位自8月分开始就一直和雇主们进行联系,提醒他们在截止日期,9月5日之前为员工进行常规检测,而相关机构也确保咋截止日期前,提供足够的检测次数供预订,并指导和协助面临困难的雇主们进行安排。 至于未接受检测的员工们,当局表示禁止他们的工作通行证,主要是为了保护他们的健康和安全。当局促请雇主迅速为员工们安排检测,可到保健促进局的拭子检测登记系统(Swab Registration System,简称SRS)进行登记。 若有需要,雇主也可以联系相关的部门,即建筑业的致函[email protected]寻求帮助,海洋和加工业者可致函 [email protected],而有关住在客工宿舍的制造业或服务业客工,雇主可联系www.mom.gov.sg/feedback。若雇主在为员工登记拭子检测上遇到困难,可致函[email protected].。 雇主需委托安全管理人员 另一方面,建设局自6月开始已经检查了超过2500个工地,发现每十个工地中就有一个需要加强防疫措施。而为了杜绝工地成为冠病散播温床,雇主必须在工地里委托安全管理人员,确保工地的安全,至今也已有5万人接受和完成有关培训课程。 安全管理人员的工作包括了确保工地内的员工有登记、测体温、为双手消毒、出席每日会议并提醒员工们注意安全。 工地的安全措施包括了划分区域、避免不同区域员工的接触、错开休息时间和地点、设立指示牌和隔板,并且在每日经常接触的部位和地点进行消毒工作。…

COVID-19: Mask collection rate increased to 67% after Singapore gov’t extended the deadline to tomorrow

Approximately 67 percent of the 1.37 million Singapore households have collected face…

傅海燕称NETS争议广告无恶意,但“美丽求求你”讽刺视频不妥

今年7月底,闹得沸沸扬扬的电子支付平台NETS广告风波引起热议,除了广告公司和艺人周崇庆致歉,网红“美丽求求你”(Preetipls)也因为拍摄讽刺视频,被警方介入调查,并发出24个月有条件警告。 昨日(10日),文化、社区及青年部长傅海燕在一项活动上重提此事,她表示并不觉得NETS广告有任何冒犯之意,反而是网红“美丽求求你“的讽刺视频使用侮辱性语言, 行为实属不妥。 傅海燕昨日受邀至义顺星烁初级学院参与种族和谐资源中心OnePeople.SG的第五届模拟联合国大会,在对话会上,学生重提争议广告。 对此,傅海燕坦言她个人认为对于周崇庆所饰演的角色并没有感到任何问题,并表示周崇庆当时只是在演好反串的角色,而且他所扮演的人物并具贬损意味,只是在描绘一个“普通人”的角色,如家庭主妇或是工人。 指基层领导反映广告未冒犯印裔 她补充道,针对此事,询问大多数基层领导,包括印度人,均不认为广告具有冒犯之意。 傅海燕表示,NETS广告是想向公众传达一个讯息,即付费平台能够为所有人使用,无论是何种背景、种族的人。 不过,针对网红“美丽求求你“的视频,她则认为“是不同的问题”,因为视频内,网红使用了污秽的语言,指责了广告里的艺人不敏感。 她也解释,网红“美丽求求你”也曾出现取笑华人新年的视频,这样的做法也被视为是不敏感的行为。 “美丽求求你讽刺华人新年” “如果我们放过视频,不采取任何行动,在各族间盛怒之下,万一华人也开始采取类似的侮辱性视频,这对种族间的关系又会产生什么影响?”她解释。…