Picture from Spencer’s Facebook post

By Tiffany Gwee
There were many unanswered questions that surfaced amid the alleged dog abuse incident that happened in Pasir Ris last month that stirred a massive debate amongst Singaporeans.
The father of the punished full-time National Serviceman (NSF), Mr. Simon Spencer, talked about how a warrant officer was witnessed to have thrown a “truncheon at the dogs to chase them away” and also how a “lieutenant colonel personally brutally hit an innocent dog in the presence of the NS men”. In this case then, how is it that MINDEF had claimed that the dogs were already aggressive to begin with?
Dogs were not aggressive
TOC managed to speak with a reliable source (not to be named due to confidentiality reasons) and was told that the dogs are very different from how the Army portrays them to be. “The dogs are friendly towards us, sometimes they follow us when we patrol around the camp when on guard duty.”
The dogs have also been there for “approximately 7 months” before the incident happened and before that, they had shown no signs of aggression at all – contrary to the Army’s description of the dogs.
The Army wrote on its facebook fanpage that there were six such attacks in December alone – four involving injuries to personnel.
Two separate accounts
Regarding the video of the Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) throwing the “truncheon”, the source told us two separate accounts that he knew of. His camp mate who happened to witness the video that was caught on camera narrated the first of which to him. The camera captured the then-LTC of camp exiting his vehicle and how he “picked up an umbrella from his car” to “wave at the dogs” in a threatening way when they approached him. After that, he threw the umbrella towards the direction of the dogs. It is unclear if the umbrella hit the dogs or not.
The second version was told to him by an investigative officer in Pasir Ris Camp. He mentioned that it was indeed a “truncheon” that was used to “strike towards the dogs” when he exited the car. However, the view was obscured by the opening of his car door and therefore it was unclear as to whether the truncheon hit the dogs or not, similar to the first account.
Be it an umbrella or truncheon, both accounts told of the then-LTC exiting his vehicle to wave an instrument at the dogs. The footage was probably deleted after a month just like any regular CCTV footage following the regular Standard Operating Procedures.
The LTC himself according to the source confessed to the abuse when being asked and did not deny any involvement.
Not Upholding the Promise
The source told us that Samuer (the full-time NSF that was punished for shooting the video) was told by his superior that he was “not allowed to speak of this incident”. “Sam told me that his Commanding Officer promised him that he would not get charged for this incident and that they will deal with this in a less disciplinary way.” We also learnt that by right, Samuer could have the choice between getting fined $300 for the use of recording devices in the camp or being confined and monitored. Unfortunately, Samuer was not given a choice to choose and had to succumb to confinement. Samuer was given 21 days of Stoppage of Leave (SOL).
It seems like although Samuer’s Commanding Officer did not wish to punish the person who recorded and shared the video, he could not really do much to help since the higher authorities (MSD, MINDEF) had the utmost right and decided to go ahead with the charge.
Questioning the Core Value of Ethics
The source indicated disappointment in the way the higher authorities handled the situation. “One of our main core values in Army is ‘Ethics’,” he remarked, “but I witnessed none of it in this whole issue. Sam did the wrong thing but it was done on a good basis and what he did was ethical. I am disappointed in them not upholding one of the core values.”
He also talked about how the organisation he trusted in “failed to honour their words” and is “not as honourable as they may seem”. There was much “betrayal of trust” observed that caused the source to be even more disheartened about the situation.
Since soldiers who expose certain misdeeds committed by the higher authorities are punished regardless of motivation of contravening the regulations, there will no longer be any protection of ‘whistleblowers’ who wish to keep their identity a secret from the rest. This will deter many from speaking up against immoral practices or unethical behaviour in the future, completely contradictory to all the talk about upholding core values in the Army. This issue not only raised questions about animal treatment behind close doors but also sheds light on the erosion of trust between the soldiers and the higher authorities.
Camp back to normal
When asked about the situation in camp now, the source said that “no one cares about it anymore” and it is all back to normal. “Not many people actually bother to ask about it because many are scared of getting punished, but I feel like it is the right thing to do.”
The LTC involved in the saga had a ‘change of command’ with regards to his position as he was scheduled for retirement due to his age.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

面对四控状 男律师涉非礼偷拍裙底照

知法犯法,年轻男律师在任职的律师事务所内,被指涉及非礼和偷拍年轻女律师三次,面对四项控状。 以优秀成绩毕业于本地大学,在德尊律师事务所(Drew & Napier)任职的年轻男律师,于昨日(11月11日)被控一项非礼罪以及三项侮辱女性尊严罪名。 他全部不认罪。 受害者和被告的名字都在法官的谕令下,不得公布于媒体上,以起到保护受害者作用。 据法庭文件指出,案发时,被告和三名受害者都在同一家律师事务所工作,目前被告已经辞职,到另一家律师事务所就职。 控状指出,被告于2017年4月份,晚上8时许在公司内偷拍受害者的胸口内衣和裙底风光,此为被告首次干案。 在同年10月,被告再次涉及偷拍受害者的裙底照,甚至用其大腿触碰受害者的手臂。 指调查官诱导认罪 昨天在庭上,调查官招供时指出,指被告在去年11月录口供时,承认犯案,但是如今却反指调查官诱导他录口供,因此不承认有关的口供。 法庭因此发起审讯中的审讯,以便确定有关的口供是否能作为呈堂证据。…

WP’s chief Pritam Singh remembers 90-year-old ardent supporter of the party after his passing

Singapore’s Workers’ Party (WP) chief and Leader of the Opposition (LO) took…

MOH preliminarily confirms additional 548 cases of COVID-19 infection; Total tally at 31,616

As of Sunday noon (24 May), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…