By Terry Xu
Senior Staff Sergeant (SSSgt) Mydeen Sahul Hameed  has spent 10 years in the Singapore Police Force, and is stationed at the Kampong Java Neighbourhood Police Centre (NPC). He is also fluent in Tamil.
SSSgt Mydeen was taking the stand on Wednesday at the Committee of Inquiry hearing into the Little India riot last December. He and his partner were conducting routine checks for illegal immigrants in Little India on 8 December 2013.
The two police officers were initially approached by a Certis Cisco officer and told that some foreign workers were attacking a stationary bus along Race Course Road.
He thought that it was just another incident of foreign workers trying to board their buses and it is usual for things to be a little disorderly on a Sunday night.  At that time, they were about 100 metres away from Race Course Road. They finished their spot checks and arrived at the scene at 9.37pm.
Upon arrival, they saw three or four Cisco officers trying to control the crowd. At this point, Mydeen and his partner were the first police officers at the scene. The crowd in front of the bus was throwing projectiles directed at the bus. It seemed that the lady who was on the bus was the target of the crowd.
Mydeen informed EDOR [E Division Ops Room] about the incident and requested for support from the traffic police and notified EDOR that the crowd was getting bigger in size.
In the meantime, he spoke to the crowd in Tamil, asking them to move back and to stop throwing things at the bus.
Some in the crowd said to Mydeen and his partner that a friend of theirs had been run over by the bus. They wanted the bus driver to be brought to justice for the death. Mydeen replied that they would if the crowd allowed them to do their job.
He heard some in the crowd say in Tamil that they were not respected in Singapore and that this was repeated several times by different individuals in the crowd.
Committee of Inquiry (COI) Chairman, Mr Selvam asked Mydeen if he had heard this complaint before when he did his rounds in Little India. Mydeen said he had not.
What he could see, Mydeen said, was that the crowd was angry with the bus driver and the timekeeper and were throwing things at the two of them who had taken refuge in the bus.
The crowd was also heard shouting, “Friend was killed by the two of them and life has no value.”
Mr Selvam asked if Mydeen knew of any past incidents that the crowd might be referring to. Mydeen replied that there was no mention of any past incidents. He had also not heard such a comment or complaint from the workers before.
He saw about 100 South-Asians gathered at the scene. About 10-15 were in front of the bus throwing things at the bus. He observed the rest were shouting, instigating or just being curious onlookers.
About 5 mins later, ASP Johnathan Tang arrived on the scene and took charge of the area.
Mydeen said he noticed the lady in the bus poking her head out of the bus. He told her to get back inside of the bus but she did not listen and continued screaming.
Mydeen and other officers later formed a human barrier to shield the SCDF officers who were trying to extricate the body of Sakthivel Kumaravelu from under the bus.
Later, as the police shielded the bus driver and the timekeeper and escorted the two from the bus to safety, Mydeen said the crowd’s anger escalated as they saw the two person emerging from the bus.
By this time, stones and beer bottles were thrown at the officers and Mydeen said he was struck in the stomach by a rock.
He later formed a shield party along with other officers to protect himself and control the crowd, but eventually had to hide behind a fire engine for safety. They continued to be pelted by projectiles from the crowd, while they awaited the arrival of the special operations command (SOC) force.
COI member and former police commissioner, Tee Tua Ba, asked how many were engaged in the act of burning the vehicles. Mydeen said that it was about five to ten men.
Mydeen agreed with the former police commissioner that a loud hailer would have been useful in the riot but he was not equipped with that at the point in time. In his opinion, he could have effectively communicated with the crowd, but the crowd might or might not have understood what he was trying to say to them, he said.
ASP Jonathan Tang then instructed the group to take shelter in the ambulance.
Later, it was decided that the ambulance, with the officers within, would move out of the area towards Bukit Timah Road, to regroup and plan their next move.
Shortly after, the SOC arrived and the group of police officers formed a second line behind the SOC as the SOC prepared to move into action.
Mydeen told the COI that he is not trained to handle a riot, and said that the speed of the back-up resources is important.
He felt that the crowd was rowdy because the Indian workers were sad over the accident, and were emotional as they felt they were discriminated against in Singapore. To make things worse, some in the crowd were also high on alcohol, he said.
When asked how he knew that some in the crowd were drunk, he said that the individuals had slurred speech.
Mydeen added that if there had been more police officers on the ground sooner that night, they could have deterred the crowd from the violence. He estimated that there were about 200 to 400 people in the crowd, but there were only 10 to 15 police officers then. With more officers, they could have controlled the crowd, he said.
The back-up support also took quite some time to arrive, he added.
Mydeen said that he did not make any arrests and did not notice the SOC making any arrests as well.  He only noticed the plain-clothes policemen arresting some people after midnight at Race Course Road.
When asked if he noticed any significant changes in Little India since the riot, he said that the area has fewer number of people now, and that the open field along Race Course Road is now vacant. He said it is more peaceful now.
Nevertheless, he does not feel that there is either an increase or a decrease in the number of drunk workers at Little India compared to two years ago.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

9-year-old male student laced water bottle of female classmate with Dettol hand soap

A nine-year-old male student poured Dettol liquid soap into a female student’s…

疫情持续 今年的澳洲“袋鼠”演习不办了

有鉴于全球冠状病毒19 疫情仍持续,新加坡武装部队已决定今年暂停所有大规模海外军事演习,包括每年都在澳洲举行的“袋鼠”演习(Exercise Wallaby)。 国防部在今日(12日)发文告表示,所有大规模的海外演习暂停。若疫情有个赛山,新加坡才会持续在澳洲的较小规模培训活动,惟必须遵守安全需求,以避免病毒传播。 “袋鼠”演习自1990年来就延续至今,是武装部队最大型的海外演习,在昆士兰州的肖尔沃特湾训练区(SWBTA)进行。 国防部感谢澳洲政府和国防部、以及当地居民常年来对我部队的支持。该部也强调,新澳双边防御关系仍牢固,在澳洲昆士兰中部和北部,两国共同开罚的训练去和现金培训措施,将强化防御合作,使两国部队受惠。

另一“女佣洗冤录”? 被指盗雇主存款菲佣成功脱罪

高庭对前女佣巴蒂案在今年9月的判决,无疑在本埠抛下震撼弹,巴蒂原本被判监禁26个月,但高庭推翻国家法院判决,法官陈成安也形容樟宜机场集团前主席廖文良一家可能存在“不当意图”,女佣巴蒂有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。 不过,10月30日,高庭亦推翻另一和女佣有关的判决。一名菲律宾籍女佣,原本被指控盗取老顾祝银行存款8千元,被判坐牢一年。不过经上诉得直无罪释放。 名为波蒂拉(Portela Vilma Jimenez)的50岁菲佣,原本负责照顾89岁的老雇主夫妇,雇主妻子不良于行。 但是,老雇主指控波蒂拉在2017年1月和2月期间,八次盗提老雇主银行存款,面对多达10项偷窃控状。波蒂拉不认罪,也指责老雇主四度非礼她,还要和她发生性关系。 波蒂拉也指老雇主趁老妇熟睡时闯入她房间,老雇主提议500元任摸,前者为了钱而答应。国家法院法官早前下判时,认为老雇主非礼波蒂拉一两次,但没必要一再不偿,并指责女佣口供前后不一,判她坐牢一年。 不满刑罚的女佣则透过来自尤金(Eugene Thuraisingam)律师楼的两名大状黄舒旺和夏珊娜,再次上诉,并提出如下疑点: 老雇主声称2017年2月初发现有未经授权提款,但审讯时却揭露当时根本没人从他户口提款 老雇主发现后,却拖了三个星期才报案 老雇主声称钱包一直在身上,那么波蒂拉如何拿到提款卡?…

Can a politicised President’s Office truly unite Singaporeans?

Joshua Chiang/ The first time I learnt that the head of state…