By Terry Xu
Senior Staff Sergeant (SSSgt) Mydeen Sahul Hameed  has spent 10 years in the Singapore Police Force, and is stationed at the Kampong Java Neighbourhood Police Centre (NPC). He is also fluent in Tamil.
SSSgt Mydeen was taking the stand on Wednesday at the Committee of Inquiry hearing into the Little India riot last December. He and his partner were conducting routine checks for illegal immigrants in Little India on 8 December 2013.
The two police officers were initially approached by a Certis Cisco officer and told that some foreign workers were attacking a stationary bus along Race Course Road.
He thought that it was just another incident of foreign workers trying to board their buses and it is usual for things to be a little disorderly on a Sunday night.  At that time, they were about 100 metres away from Race Course Road. They finished their spot checks and arrived at the scene at 9.37pm.
Upon arrival, they saw three or four Cisco officers trying to control the crowd. At this point, Mydeen and his partner were the first police officers at the scene. The crowd in front of the bus was throwing projectiles directed at the bus. It seemed that the lady who was on the bus was the target of the crowd.
Mydeen informed EDOR [E Division Ops Room] about the incident and requested for support from the traffic police and notified EDOR that the crowd was getting bigger in size.
In the meantime, he spoke to the crowd in Tamil, asking them to move back and to stop throwing things at the bus.
Some in the crowd said to Mydeen and his partner that a friend of theirs had been run over by the bus. They wanted the bus driver to be brought to justice for the death. Mydeen replied that they would if the crowd allowed them to do their job.
He heard some in the crowd say in Tamil that they were not respected in Singapore and that this was repeated several times by different individuals in the crowd.
Committee of Inquiry (COI) Chairman, Mr Selvam asked Mydeen if he had heard this complaint before when he did his rounds in Little India. Mydeen said he had not.
What he could see, Mydeen said, was that the crowd was angry with the bus driver and the timekeeper and were throwing things at the two of them who had taken refuge in the bus.
The crowd was also heard shouting, “Friend was killed by the two of them and life has no value.”
Mr Selvam asked if Mydeen knew of any past incidents that the crowd might be referring to. Mydeen replied that there was no mention of any past incidents. He had also not heard such a comment or complaint from the workers before.
He saw about 100 South-Asians gathered at the scene. About 10-15 were in front of the bus throwing things at the bus. He observed the rest were shouting, instigating or just being curious onlookers.
About 5 mins later, ASP Johnathan Tang arrived on the scene and took charge of the area.
Mydeen said he noticed the lady in the bus poking her head out of the bus. He told her to get back inside of the bus but she did not listen and continued screaming.
Mydeen and other officers later formed a human barrier to shield the SCDF officers who were trying to extricate the body of Sakthivel Kumaravelu from under the bus.
Later, as the police shielded the bus driver and the timekeeper and escorted the two from the bus to safety, Mydeen said the crowd’s anger escalated as they saw the two person emerging from the bus.
By this time, stones and beer bottles were thrown at the officers and Mydeen said he was struck in the stomach by a rock.
He later formed a shield party along with other officers to protect himself and control the crowd, but eventually had to hide behind a fire engine for safety. They continued to be pelted by projectiles from the crowd, while they awaited the arrival of the special operations command (SOC) force.
COI member and former police commissioner, Tee Tua Ba, asked how many were engaged in the act of burning the vehicles. Mydeen said that it was about five to ten men.
Mydeen agreed with the former police commissioner that a loud hailer would have been useful in the riot but he was not equipped with that at the point in time. In his opinion, he could have effectively communicated with the crowd, but the crowd might or might not have understood what he was trying to say to them, he said.
ASP Jonathan Tang then instructed the group to take shelter in the ambulance.
Later, it was decided that the ambulance, with the officers within, would move out of the area towards Bukit Timah Road, to regroup and plan their next move.
Shortly after, the SOC arrived and the group of police officers formed a second line behind the SOC as the SOC prepared to move into action.
Mydeen told the COI that he is not trained to handle a riot, and said that the speed of the back-up resources is important.
He felt that the crowd was rowdy because the Indian workers were sad over the accident, and were emotional as they felt they were discriminated against in Singapore. To make things worse, some in the crowd were also high on alcohol, he said.
When asked how he knew that some in the crowd were drunk, he said that the individuals had slurred speech.
Mydeen added that if there had been more police officers on the ground sooner that night, they could have deterred the crowd from the violence. He estimated that there were about 200 to 400 people in the crowd, but there were only 10 to 15 police officers then. With more officers, they could have controlled the crowd, he said.
The back-up support also took quite some time to arrive, he added.
Mydeen said that he did not make any arrests and did not notice the SOC making any arrests as well.  He only noticed the plain-clothes policemen arresting some people after midnight at Race Course Road.
When asked if he noticed any significant changes in Little India since the riot, he said that the area has fewer number of people now, and that the open field along Race Course Road is now vacant. He said it is more peaceful now.
Nevertheless, he does not feel that there is either an increase or a decrease in the number of drunk workers at Little India compared to two years ago.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

有剩余物品就分享 榜鹅居民甘榜精神抗病魔

新型冠状病毒来袭,新加坡人们纷纷发挥“甘榜”互助互爱精神,除了免费派发口罩,在榜鹅西部数个公共组屋区内,可以看到电梯内被置放了消毒液和酒精湿巾,提醒人们注意健康,令人感到心暖暖。 此前,本社报导有夫妇在榜鹅地铁站街上派发免费口罩,获得网民赞许。也有民众自发派口罩惠及有需要的家庭、老人或小孩。 据了解,榜鹅西部一些组屋的电梯内,都备有瓶装的消毒液,以及一篮的酒精湿巾,并且还附有手写的字条,孤立居民们使用或在必要时领取有关物品。有关的字条上写道,“请使用你需要的物品”、“请使用……来自你邻居的关心”。 之前脸书上也有人响应榜鹅派发口罩的行为,而在电梯内放置清洁用品及口罩的案例也非首例,但是依然让人们感到温馨非常,相信国人心中的温暖能够传递,让更多类似的暖心举止在国内飘扬,应对病魔也没在怕。 电梯内置放消毒液 据榜鹅居民反映,他们赞许这种“甘榜精神”,认为这体现社区力量,居民守望相助,也有助降低对新冠病毒的恐惧心理。 “就算你无需要使用这些东西,你也会获得安全感,真正感觉到甘榜精神-既然有多出来的物品,分享,有何不可?” 也有居民坦言,现在市面上也很难买到消毒液,但有“佛心”居民愿意捐出一瓶供大家使用,方便街坊邻里。 越南抢购口罩派发居民 另一名榜鹅居民,陈建昇(39岁)和其妻子Vy Chen(34岁),在听闻新加坡出现口罩短缺后,立刻意识到他们能够做点什么来帮忙了。两人趁着农历新年假期,带着孩子家人到越南时,听说有人为了赚钱而高价转售口罩。 “在经历过严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)后,我们了解到这是不仅要为自己的家人和朋友做准备,但是也要顾及民众。”…

Lily Neo: It was a typo disaster

~by: Jewel Philemon~ Dr Lily Neo, MP for Tanjong Pagar GRC, has…

三个月接获65起骗局 警吁勿轻信声称“中国官方”来电

“Mr Soh接到了声称是来自新加坡电信的电话,他被告知其电信账号即将被终止。他非常紧张,以为自己卷入一宗犯罪事件。” 33岁的Mr Soh目前任职于一家批发公司,是马籍人士。当时他正前往亮阁商场,打算听从声称是来自中国政府的指示,将1200新元转账到中国户口,但因情绪失控的行为被两位警员发现,才得以阻止了这场诈骗事件。 据《海峡时报》报道,警方周一(1日)所公布的数据显示,自1月至4月期间,已接获65类似的诈骗案件,大部分与冒称中国官方机关的身份进行诈骗,涉及了至少480万新元的损失,其中有4万8000新元的损失与比特币自动柜员机有关。 大部分受害者如同Mr Soh,是华人。 乌节路邻里警局副局长Chang Lian Seng表示“ 受害者表现非常焦虑,在他领钱后,他直接冲往比特币自动提款机,这就是诈骗的迹象”。 受害者以中文表示,未来在遇到类似状况会先确认事情的缘由,再来做决定和打算。…

柔苏丹:外人无权摆布柔事务 “别浪费时间在没意义事件上”

马来西亚柔佛州务大臣事件闹得沸沸扬扬,终在周日(4月14日)告一段落。惟苏丹依布拉欣表示,联邦政府不应该就柔佛州权威争议 “浪费时间”,直接剑指马来西亚首相马哈迪医生。 这位60岁的统治者在昨日新州务大臣宣誓就任后,于脸书上帖文说,“我建议政府不要浪费时间在没有利益的事情、诽谤和捏造事实上,只是为了转移注意力和混淆人民。” “相反的,请将注意力集中在人民福利和改善国家经济发展方面。” 柔佛州统治者和其儿子,皇储东姑依斯迈曾因前州务大臣拿督奥斯曼于上周辞职后,谁有权力委任新州务大臣,以及联邦政府是否有权商议柔佛事宜方面,与首相马哈迪医生隔空骂战。 马哈迪:我国非绝对君主制国家 今年已93岁的马哈迪医生表示,他有权谈论柔佛事宜,因为柔佛属于马来西亚的一部分。 《马来邮报》上周也引述他的话说,“我认为,如果任命首相和州务大臣的人是君主,那么我们的国家就不再是民主国家” 。 “人民选出政党,再由该政党中选出一名州务大臣的权力如被剥夺,这样,我们的国家将成为一个绝对君主制国家。” 苏丹依布拉欣周日说道,“柔佛政府存在已久,他有自己的问话和管理方式”。 “外面的人没有必要开始谈论谁有权力,以及如何管理州属。”…