Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP) Edwin Yong Wen Wei

By Terry Xu
9.40pm at Orchard NPC. Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP) Edwin Yong Wen Wei heard police officers from Kampong Jaya NPC requesting back up for an incident along Racecourse Road.
He then heard ASP Jonathan Tang making a request via the radio, and drove to attend to the incident along with Corporal Arshard Abdul Murad in their police vehicle.
They arrived at the scene at about 9.50 pm and parked about 10 metres away from the ambulance that was in front of the damaged bus involved in the traffic accident.
He observed that there was about 150 male Indians throwing objects at the bus. He then proceeded to the bus to assist the officers there.
The crowd spoke in English about how their friend was involved in the accident.
He also noted that the communication system was jammed as many were trying to communicate via the radio all at the same time.
Providing cover
ASP Yong and Corporal Arshard saw that the officers present at the scene were being pelted by projectiles, so they went to get two shields from the police car and helped the officers defend the SCDF crew, who were extricating the body pinned under the bus.
ASP Jonathan Tang, who was then the highest ranking police officer and first on scene, took charge as the commanding officer and gave the directions that the priority was to defend the SCDF officers. He subsequently transmitted this instruction to the other officers.
ASP Tang then told ASP Yong to move his vehicle so that the ambulance could move.
As they made their way to the bus again after escorting the bus driver and the timekeeper to the ambulance, they were once again pelted by the crowd.
Around eight police officers have gathered at the fire engine and as ASP Yong did not have a shield, he was pushed to the centre of the group for protection. At this point in time, he saw that four of the officers were injured as the projectiles continued to rain down on them.
Regroup
He then boarded the ambulance along with the rest of the officers to regroup and plan the next phase of action. Taking note of the injured officers at the back of the ambulance, ASP Tang discussed with the SCDF officer at the front of the vehicle about how to get out of the place as there were no officers outside of the ambulance guarding it.
They managed to drive off and stop at the junction of Bukit Timah Road and Racecourse Road, where they formed a line to stop the rioters from proceeding any further.
The officers could not do anything but wait for the Special Operations Command (SOC) to arrive, while taking steps to ensure the safety of innocent parties by preventing the public from entering, and the rioters from exiting, Racecourse Road.
ASP Yong estimated that he had at the time 15 to 20 officers with him. When asked by COI member and former police commissioner, Mr Tee Tua Ba if they could stop the rioters of 100 over individuals, he replied that they could not, but it was not an issue as the rioters were focused near the scene of the accident.
Controlling the crowd
When the SOC finally arrived at the scene to disperse the crowd, he continued to focus on cordoning off the junction between Bukit Timah Road and Racecourse Road.
He did not feel at any point in time was it justified to use his firearm as the prerequisite stated in the firearms protocol were not met, and he believed the use of firearms would likely have aggravated the crowd.
He also noted that many of those in the crowd were drunk, as he noticed the bloodshot eyes and smell of alcohol from them.
ASP Yong did not feel that the T-baton could be used to disperse the crowd as, it was meant for defensive purposes and it had a short range. He felt that the riot shield was more effective instead.
He also felt that there was a language barrier during the whole incident as the crowd could not understand his instructions made in English.
He said that he was trained in crowd control and conflict management involving disputes, but not something of this scale.
Not enough manpower to make arrests
With the number of officers on site, ASP Yong did not feel that there was enough manpower to effect any arrest. Their priority was to protect SCDF, the timekeeper and the bus driver, and any arrests made would be of secondary importance.
He also said that he did not make any arrest during the incident and was instead making sure his men were accounted for. He also did not notice that the SOC arrested anyone but noted that the plain-clothes officers were the ones making the arrests.
When COI chairman Mr Selvam made the point about the police being spooked, ASP Yong felt that he had to clarify. He said that the officers were merely quickening their process of getting from one place to another, and consolidate the limited number of officers present.
When Mr Tee asked ASP Yong if he recited the riot act to the crowd, he replied that he did not and he do not think that the crowd would listen as they were emotionally affected by the accident and a single phase would unlikely have any effect.
Image from Today Online

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Public Forum – 24 May, Saturday

Implications of inflation on your investments and the labour market

Election Dept: Presidential Elections Committee did not select President

Two weeks ago (13 Oct), Straits Times Opinion Editor Chua Mui Hoong…

【冠状病毒19】测试盒校准出问题 33人被误列为确诊

根据卫生部文告,卫生部对实验室测试进行定期检查,最近却发现因为其中一套测试盒出现校准问题,有33人被误列为对冠状病毒19 呈阳性反应。 国家公共卫生实验室再次为他们进行检测,确认上述33人都对冠病呈阴性。 卫生部也表示,当局已立即采取行动纠正问题,有关实验室也暂停检测工作,以解决问题。 不过,当局也表示审查也未发现有出现误判为阴性的测试结果。 另一方面,有鉴于有两名病患的检测结果模棱两可,当局暂时把他们 列为”阳性“并隔离。不过较后进行重新检测,已确认他们都对冠病呈阴性反应。 上述两名病例,分别是博览中心隔离设施服务的20岁男护士,以及52岁女义工。

泰选委会指违反选举法 准备取消塔纳通候选资格

泰国选举委员会周二(4月23日)指责,著名反政府政治新星塔纳通违反了选举法,在大选后一个月的昨日,准备取消他的国会候选人资格。 40岁的泰国未来前进党党魁塔纳通,被指控在登记成为候选人后,仍然持有一家媒体公司的股份,因而触犯了选举法令。 自2014年军事政变以来,泰国首次全国大选的结果仍然不明朗,而将于5月9日公布的大选成绩,将决定支持军政的党派是否有足够席位让军政领导人巴育继续掌权。 选举委员会副秘书长Sawang Boonmee说道,“有证据证明,塔纳通是V-Luck Media公司的持有者或股东”。“根据宪法和选举法,它将无法成为议员候选人。” 塔纳通斥指控存政治动机 塔纳通此前曾否认违反选举法,表示在注册成为候选人之前,他已经于1月8日出售了该媒体公司的股份。他也指责有关的指控具有政治动机。 而目前,他有七天的时间向选委会举证,以反驳有关的指控。 若被判违反选举法罪名成立,塔纳通将被禁止竞选一年。而且他还可能因为参加选举而面临刑事指控,因为他在明知道自己资格不足的情况下参选,有可能被判10年徒刑和20年的政治禁令。 从荷兰返回泰国的塔纳通在脸书上贴文说到,“我刚刚得知必须尽快回国准备应对意外情况。泰国见” 。…