By Yasmeen Banu and Howard Lee
This year Budget’s speech, made by Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, and broadcast live last Friday, focuses more on the elderly, education subsidies, and increase of median wages. The Pioneer Generation Package featured heavily, as much as increase in liquor, tobacco and betting excises drew laughter and applause in the House.
How have his proposals affected the intended recipients? TOC took a look across various online platforms to gather what the people think about Budget 2014.
Pioneer Generation Package
The Pioneer Generation Package drew not only the most comments, but the most varied comments – not surprising, given the time devoted to it. Much of it was also related to the rising cost of healthcare and the 3M system.
National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan responded to the announcement on Sunday, and said that the Budget and the Pioneer Generation Package “will go ways to ‘debunk’ the view that healthcare is not affordable for seniors…this is because of the greater healthcare subsidies seniors will be getting”.
Apparently, not all citizens agreed with him. Many referred to the base issue of rising healthcare costs and pointed out that such measures might not be necessary if these costs were better managed.
There were also concerns about whether the PGP might unfairly burden future generations, much as it is welcome relief for the elderly. Others were suspicious about whether the premiums for younger generation might be increased to cover for the expenditure. There was also scepticism about whether there would be complete and unfettered disbursement of the $8 billion fund, as much as there were doubts about the sufficiency of the package.
Clearly, the PGP was received with mixed feelings, across age groups.
Budget views - PGP 3M
Issues of inclusiveness
While most accepted that the PGP was necessary and morally a step in the right direction, commenters were also disappointed that the Budget mostly left out the middle income and working class. The benefit of the Budget to families was also called into question, with those in the “sandwiched class” touted as feeling the brunt.
The unhappiness seems to be directed at the Budget’s attempt to hand out freebies, which is then seen to be at the expense of everyday citizens. Some of these sentiments can also be found in grouses about medical costs, with some suspecting that the middle-aged working class will be forced to foot the bill for the PGP.
The efforts made to boost productivity were also deemed inadequate in helping the man on the street. Some viewed the various schemes proposed as ways to help corporations rather than citizens. In all, the proposals made to boost the economy, while lauded by the business community, did not go down well with citizens in general.

The extension of the PIC (Productivity and Innovation Credit) by another three years is much welcomed but small companies may be disappointed that there are no changes made to the level of cash payouts available.” – Ms Tan Bin Eng, Partner, Business Incentives Advisory, Ernst & Young Solutions LLP (as published on the EY website)
“The government is taking steps to strike a balance between pushing for economic growth while maintaining social equality and stability. This is an important recognition by the Government as otherwise, sustained growth is not possible.” – Ms Amy Ang, Partner, Financial Services Tax, Ernst & Young Solutions LLP (as published on the EY website)

Budegt views - inc
Excess of excise
While jokes were lobbed at the Finance Minister about his announcement on the increase of alcohol, tobacco and betting excises, these were equally matched with vehement rejection.
Some commenters were adamant that the tax will be ineffective in preventing drinking, smoking and gambling, but others also noted the glaring contrast to a complete lack of effort to increase the tax burden on the “big guys”. Corporate tax remains unmoved, which led some to lament that the increase in excises would only hurt consumers, line the government’s pocket and increase the cost of living.

How to damage an already overpriced F&B industry: Raise alcohol excise duties by 25 per cent when you look at the economic benefits bestowed on Hong Kong by the abolition of drinks or wine, this is a baffling move.” – David Sandison, Partner, PwC Singapore (as reported in AsiaOne)

Budget views - excise

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Chan Chun Sing: Singapore committed to enhance local mask-making capabilities throughout pandemic period

Minister for Trade and Industry Chan Chun Sing highlighted in his Facebook…

政府带头试行“边赚边缴”保健储蓄模式 暂无计划私人界推行

为确保自雇人士退休后能够负担医疗费用,自2020年起,将试行“边赚边缴”保健储蓄模式(Contribute As You Earn)。人力部长杨莉明表示,目前由政府带头实行该计划,暂不打算在私人领域实施。 根据《海峡时报》报道,在与博纳产业总裁伊斯迈的对话环节中,杨莉明阐述,“边赚边缴”保健储蓄模式,针对为政府工作的自雇人士,如自由摄影师等,政府会在支付酬劳前直接填补他们的保健储蓄户头,为自雇人士带来更多方便。 目前自雇人士的收入净额超过6000新元,仍需强制支付保健储蓄的费用。杨莉明表示,该计划使他们无须担心在“低潮期”还得应付大笔支出,同时也能提前享有保健储蓄户头每年四巴仙的利息。目前自雇人士每年只需缴交一次公积金。 “边赚边缴”保健储蓄模式于去年3月推出,旨在协助填补自雇人士的公积金保健储蓄户头。 博纳产业总裁伊斯迈也询问,自雇人士若将贡献出最高金额到保健储蓄中,是否会获得其他公积金帐户的豁免权。目前保健储蓄的缴费率从四巴仙至10.5巴仙不等,均由员工与其收入净额所定,最高可达5760新元至7560新元不等。 公积金其他账户还包括,普通账户、特殊或退休账户。目前员工除了保健储蓄账户外,仍需为其他公积金账户缴费。 对此,杨莉明表示,公积金不仅仅是为了保健需求,亦为了保障未来退休生活以及购买房子,而自雇人士就如同一般聘雇人士,他们的公积金比例分配也应于一般聘雇人士相同,贡献20巴仙到公积金账户里头。 自雇人士在这10年期间,占我国劳动者的比率介于8至10巴仙,尽管去年则维持在8巴仙,但整体人数较前年减少。而政府于2017年起,逐步落实自雇人士劳资政工作小组的建议,包括推出新保险产品补贴因生病或受伤失去的收入、制定确保自雇人士准时获得酬劳的劳资政标准等。 上述劳资政标准自去年3月推出至今,已获约570家来自各行各业的企业所采纳,在采购自雇人士提供的服务前,先在合约中明文规定服务协议。

Petition to pressurize Masagos to re-open home-based food businesses works, thanks to upcoming GE

Last Mon (27 Apr), the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources…

“Weak” response to Tatmadaw violence against anti-coup civilian movement sends “dangerous message” that military will not suffer repercussions, says Special Advisory Council for Myanmar as it warns of imminent “lethal crackdown”

The “weak” international response to the Tatmadaw’s violence against the anti-coup civilian…