By Daniel Goh
If you’ve been religiously following the news in Singapore’s hawker food scene, probably the most shocking news in recent weeks was that young graduate hawker Tan Jun Yuan, who runs a Bak Kut Teh stall in a Toa Payoh coffeeshop, threw in his Good Morning towel just five months into the trade.
Jun Yuan, who had burst into the scene with great fanfare last September after leaving his job as a product manager to become a hawker, shockingly announced the closure of his business at the end of last month citing, amongst other things, the labour crunch. He had explained that it had been difficult finding staff, and one that had even pilfered from his takings. In one of the interviews with independent media Jun Yuan also mentioned that he went as far as to put down a deposit for a second outlet, but without being able to hire to help man the additional branch, he had to shelf those plans.
Indeed, his announcement was met with consternation and even Makansutra’s KF Seetoh in a Facebook post lamented the loss of Jun Yuan from the hawker trade, pointing out that this is likely to accelerate the degeneration of our local food culture.
The Kitchen At The Centre Of It All.
Interestingly, Jun Yuan also mentioned that at some point, for his business to truly work, they would need to expand to four to five outlets, and with a central kitchen supplying them. He said this when he posted his stall’s impending closure:
“You may or may not know that our model has always been premised on having more outlets.”
What’s more interesting than what he said, was what he didn’t say. Consider this – Jun Yuan is a first-class honours graduate in Management from the University of Manchester. One can safely assume that he has some idea of how to put together a business plan, forecast for various case scenarios and run some numbers to arrive at the conclusion that for a food business in Singapore to succeed and thrive, one needs scale. A scale that requires at least four to five different branches – a number of profit centres that help support one cost centre (the central kitchen) – in order to generate a healthy cash flow.
This is, if one reads between the lines, quite revealing. It shows two things:

  1. Most food businesses in Singapore, in order to survive and thrive, require sufficient capital to provide the runway so that they can build the kind of scale required, and that’s likely to be to the tune of millions; and
  2. That commercial rentals have skyrocketed beyond a tipping point such that most food businesses, even those that run hawker stalls, require the facilities of a central kitchen somewhere else – usually located in industrial estates with far cheaper rents – in order to manage costs.

Central kitchens are fantastic facilities in that they can generate a large quantity of food in very short amount of time at possibly lower prices due to economies of scale, streamlining of duplicated functions and higher automation. But many food businesses – aside from catering services or large-scale food service businesses such as hotels – previously never needed to use central kitchens because it has always been that what was produced onsite is sufficient to cater for the required number of customers to help keep the business afloat. The fact that central kitchens are now a key factor in determining whether a food business can take off only means that existing kitchen facilities within each establishment may be insufficient to produce enough food quickly to supply the larger number of customers needed to sustain the business. This is worrying.
Make no bones about it – this means that there’s even less breathing room for small, independent food businesses in Singapore, moving forward. And that their chances of success have just shrunk to an even more diminutive number.
Perhaps this is one of the reasons why you see that every time a new mall opens in Singapore, the usual suspects when it comes to F&B options always appear – they’re the ones with sufficient capitalization, and have large central kitchens to supply pre-prepared food in sufficient quantities to cater to those needs.
At the risk of sounding alarmist, I’d argue that this trend of the over-reliance on central kitchens may have unhealthy consequences on Singapore’s food industry and, by extension, our food culture. For the signs surely support Seetoh’s doom and gloom prophecy where one day our younger generations merely subsist on machine-made, soulless food that will finally sound the death knell on our Singapore food heritage.
 
This post was first published at The Beer Hawker.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PAP ND Message – Words are hollow without moral leadership

Nothing new as PM Lee avoids Temasek. Khairulanwar Zaini.

Government admits Singapore lacks eco-system for sports

By Kannan Raj Despite boasting of a world class Singapore Sports Hub…

降低公交路线对武吉班让居民影响 交通部调整繁忙时段路线

日前报导,民众对公共巴士服务做出的部分调整表达不满,为此陆路交通管理局将保留972号路线,把971E号的快捷路线在繁忙时段改为主干路线,并增加973号路线的巴士班次。 交通部高级政务部长徐芳达今早(8月13日)在脸书上公布以上消息,并指这是和武吉班让基层顾问连荣华及谢秉辉会面后,以降低巴士路线调整对居民带来的影响,而同交通部及陆交局达成的共识。 首先,原定将改道至纽顿地铁站的972号巴士路线,将会保持原有的往返武吉班让和乌节路的路线,改为另外推出972M服务路线,将部分巴士改道途经杜尼安路杜尼安路(Dunearn Road)和史各士路(Scotts Road)。 而在繁忙时段,当局也会增加972号及972M号巴士的服务趟次。 基于有关调整,候车时间将会延长,当局希望民众能够理解,并使用巴士服务应用程序规划行程,减短候车时间。 当局将现有的971E号的快捷巴士路线,在繁忙时段调整为主干路线,会途经柏堤路后,前往武吉知马高速公路和泛岛高速公路。 繁忙时段将会有所延长,即从原本的早上7时10分至50分、傍晚6时05分至6时30分,延长到早上6时30分至8时30分、傍晚6时05分至7时35分,这也将延长乘客通勤时间。 惟,971E的车程和车费都和700号路线相似,每趟巴士费将削减6角,沿途可停靠的巴士站会更多。 除了971E和972号路线在繁忙时段有所调整,973路线也会在相关时段,增加通往山景地铁站的班次。当局将会在两个月后,再次评估有关的调整。 30日起缩短路线及暂停服务…

Singapore vulnerable to dangers posed by “critical infrastructure failure” in Southeast Asia: IMDA board member, on recent cybersecurity breaches

Singapore is vulnerable to risks posed by “critical infrastructure failure” in the…