AWARE has issued a media statement in response to Budget 2014, as announced by the Finance Minister yesterday. The gender equality advocacy group agreed with many of the Budget proposals, but also pointed out several inadequacies.
These include issues related to support for caregivers and family, the ability of the Pioneer Generation package to cover the needs of other generations, and the need decouple social support from employment.
AWARE also requested for the government to address current policies that “penalise children based on the employment, family structures or other choices of their parents”, such as access to public housing, maternity leave entitlements and childcare entitlements, as this could impinge on the social mobility of the children.
AWARE ended its statement with a call for more transparency for the Budget, whereby the government could “introduce a system of consistently, publicly and comprehensively reporting on the utilisation and efficacy of the government initiatives discussed in each Budget”.
The statement is in line with the group’s pre-Budget recommendations. Appended below is AWARE’s media statement in full.
———-
BUDGET: AWARE welcomes new directions, but questions remain
On 29 January, AWARE submitted its fourth annual set of recommendations for the national budget, emphasising the issues of: 1) poverty and income inequality, 2) support for caregivers, 3) healthcare financing in Singapore, and 4) transparency and inclusiveness in the budget process.
With the announcement of the Budget today, we welcome the government’s recognition that many in Singapore face severe difficulty making ends meet, especially in relation to healthcare costs. We were heartened to see Minster Shanmugaratnam’s speech foreground income inequality and lack of social mobility, and to emphasise that we must “avoid permanent tiers” in society. The Minister’s remarks about the need to change workplace cultures and social norms to empower employees were also very timely.
At the same time, we continue to have questions and concerns about how these important issues will be addressed. Our comments on the Budget announcement fall under five main headings:
Support for caregivers and caregiving
In our pre-Budget recommendations, AWARE called for caregiving to be recognised as a public good. The provision of financial benefits to caregivers for elderly and disabled dependants appears to be a step in this direction. However, the use of income tax relief to compensate caregivers is regressive, as only those with higher incomes are subject to income tax and therefore in a position to benefit. Many caregivers may not be in formal employment at all, especially stay-at-home mothers, and thus will derive no advantage from this. We call upon the state to reward caregiving through direct contributions, not tax relief, for instance through payments into CPF.
If the government wishes to support shifts in workplace culture to improve productivity, it would do well to prioritise the issue of combining workforce participation with caregiving, which disproportionately disadvantages women in Singapore. The Minister enumerated generous subsidies available to companies looking to upgrade their ICT infrastructure, but mentioned no similar support for encouraging flexible work or otherwise transforming employment to facilitate caregiving. For instance, if SMEs are to be housed together to benefit from sharing facilities, the government could consider funding the inclusion of workplace crèches at these facilities.
Distribution of risk and burden of healthcare financing
AWARE has previously highlighted the particular burden that healthcare costs place upon older women. We are therefore heartened to note that the Pioneer Generation Package will help to alleviate some of the difficulties faced by this demographic. Moreover, we are pleased to learn that Medishield Life will cover pre-existing conditions – a step forward from their previous exclusion. However, because the Pioneer Generation is expressly positioned as a “unique”, one-off measure, it raises concerns about whether there will be sustainable provision for the needs of subsequent generations.
We had hoped to hear more explicit consideration of how the risk and burden of healthcare financing will be shared as between individuals and their families on the one hand, and the state on the other, in relation to the whole population and not only those included within the Pioneer Generation. We welcome the government’s statement that subsidies will be available on premiums in the future and eagerly await further details.
We also note that the Pioneer Generation Package, unlike many other forms of state support, is not means tested by family. We are interested to see if this heralds further departures from the means- testing model used by the Ministry of Health.
The role of employment in social support
The Minister described jobs as the most important safety net and emphasised the “upgrading” of workers, with the generous boost given to the Lifelong Learning Endowment Fund. Both job creation and the opportunities for workers to acquire skills are vital.
AWARE recommends that social support be decoupled from employment, employability or skill level, as there may be many members of society who are not in a position to obtain formal or skilled employment, whose basic needs in everyday life must also be met. We also note the Minister’s enthusiasm for various cost-cutting measures by employers which involve lowering labour costs through automation, and have some concern about the resulting impact on the workers who are affected by these measures.
Social mobility and disadvantages experienced by children
We welcome the Minister’s proclamation that children should not inherit disadvantage, and welcome the statement of greater government support for more affordable kindergarten places and the provision of education to a tertiary level. However, as we noted in our pre-Budget recommendations, there are numerous ways in which current policies penalise children based on the employment, family structures or other choices of their parents. For instance, access to public housing, maternity leave entitlements and childcare entitlements are tied to the marital status of parents, with negative consequences for social equality as between children of different parents.
Transparency in the Budget process
In his speech, the Minister discussed many forthcoming initiatives and alluded, with varying levels of detail, to measures from previous years. In keeping with our earlier calls for greater transparency in the Budget process, we urge the government to introduce a system of consistently, publicly and comprehensively reporting on the utilisation and efficacy of the government initiatives discussed in each Budget.
You can read AWARE’s recommendations for the Budget 2014 here.
About AWARE
Formed in 1985, AWARE is Singapore’s leading gender equality advocacy group. Our mission is to remove all gender-based barriers so as to allow individuals in Singapore to develop their potential to the fullest and realise their personal visions and hopes. We do this in three ways: research and advocacy, education and training, and support services. 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore records 8-year low in birth rate, netizens blame rising cost of living

According to the Report on Registration of Births and Deaths 2018, the…

消防栓锁起来 水管不出水! 裕廊-金文泰市镇会接民防部队警告

武吉巴督21街的第210A组屋的一户单位,在本月1日凌晨失火。然而有居民申诉,火患发生时,该楼的一个消防喉竟无法运作,紧急情况下没有水源可救火! 根据有关消防喉的标签,刚在今年10月经过检修,为此民主党秘书长徐顺全表示已致函民防部队申诉此事。据民主党文告,民防部队在本月5日回函,表示已和有关市镇会接洽跟进此事。 该区组屋由裕廊—金文泰市镇理事会负责。该市镇会也被民防部队警告,接到民防部队发出的“消除火患隐忧通知书”(Fire Hazard Abatement Notice),要求纠正问题。 民防在声明中指出,市镇会有责任维修和保养消防设施,并保证这些设施能正常运作。若被发现重犯,将面对罚款甚至是被起诉。 民防部队在上周五发布的声明中指出,火患现场附近好几个消防栓都被锁头锁住;但即便民防人员当时撬开其中一个消防栓锁头,却发现水管根本喷不出水! 民防部队表示,当天该部队约在凌晨4时31分接获失火投报,也出动了CPL60型云梯车赶赴现场。 两名分别年龄为60岁及30岁的男子站在厨房外窗沿。厨房中囤积的物品,加之两人皆已耗尽体力,也增加民防人员救援难度。 民防人员先从单位内以绳索保护两人,灾难拯救队(Disaster Assistance…

Proposed changes to the Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act: updated restraining order, safeguards against foreign influence, and more

Nearly 30 years since its introduction in 1990, the Singapore Government intends…

社论:反对党吃了一记重击?

撰文:Augustine Low 翻译:北雁 当新加坡最大、最成功的反对党,也开始向民众募捐诉讼费,还可能面对破产危机,你就知道他们正身陷险境。 当然也不奇怪,还有国人“马照跑,舞照跳”,认为反对党的问题是他们的家事,感到事不关己。 但这里有五大问题值得你我深思。 问题一:这像是在纠正反对党吗? 李显龙在2006年时曾说“现在面对刘程强、詹时中和谢镜丰,应付他们还有余力。但假设国会中有10、15或20各反对党议员,我就没有足够时间放在思考国家政策,而是忙于应付他们、思考如何争取支持者选票、如何处理这个礼拜发生的事,而不是来年的挑战?” 时间来到2011年,工人党赢得阿裕尼集选区,但却埋下市镇会困境伏笔,最终引发现今的诉讼案件。那么,有谁或任何一方,是为了让他们犯错、才去纠正他的? 那么下个问题来了:是工人党放松警戒了吗? 在赢得阿裕尼选区的狂喜中,工人党可能感觉良好,觉得一切都会顺利。 面对行动党的威权,如果有一件你最不该犯的失误,那就是在它面前放松警惕。行动党会紧咬不放,确保你付出代价。…