By Andrew Loh
The FAQ on sexuality published by the Health Promotion Board (HPB) “drives home a key STI and HIV prevention message to ‘Be faithful’ to one’s partner, rather than to have multiple partners.” Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said in a written reply to MP Lim Biow Chuan on Monday.
Mr Lim had asked the minister to “explain why the Health Promotion Board promotes a same-sex relationship as not being different from a heterosexual relationship.”
Mr Lim had earlier said to the media that he was “disappointed” with the FAQ, and highlighted the part of the FAQ which said that a “same-sex relationship is not too different from a heterosexual relationship”.
In his explanation on Monday, Mr Gan said that the sentence should be read in context, along with what followed it – that “both require the commitment of two people.”
Mr Gan said, “They highlight that relationships require commitment, and it is possible to remain faithful to one’s partner, regardless of one’s sexual orientation.”
“This drives home a key STI and HIV prevention message to ‘Be faithful’ to one’s partner, rather than to have multiple partners. This helps to protect individuals from STIs and HIV, minimise transmission risks, and thereby safeguarding public health.”
As with the reply by the HPB on its Facebook page following the public reaction to the FAQ, Mr Gan emphasised that the Government’s policy is that the family is the basic building block of Singapore society and that it continues to encourage heterosexual married couples to have healthy relationships.
“The FAQs do not encourage same-sex relationships,” the Health minister said, “but rather provide advice to young persons and their parents on mental and physical health issues from a public health perspective.”
The FAQ, which was published about a week ago, attracted both praises and criticisms from different quarters. In particular, the LGBT community lauded it for being progressive and forward looking.
Some, however, see it as a backward step which they say will lead to the state legitimising homosexuality and eventually gay marriage.
Pastor Lawrence Khong, who once referred to the LGBT rights movement as the ‘onslaught of the evil one’ and who also seem to be the loudest opponent of the FAQ, is reported to have issued a guide to church leaders on how to campaign against the FAQ.
Among its suggestions is for members to not “use church or religious rankings or titles” when writing to MPs or ministers about the FAQ. Also, they should not “forward emails as this will leave traces of the contact chain and the thread of conversation from previous writers.”
The government has so far not responded to Pastor Khong.
———————
Here is the full reply from the Health Minister:

1        The Government’s policy is that the family is the basic building block of our society. This means encouraging heterosexual married couples to have healthy relationships and to build stable nuclear and extended family units. There has been no shift in the Government’s position on this. HPB takes reference from this consistent position in its health promotion activities.
2        The Health Promotion Board (HPB)’s mission is to promote healthy living for all Singaporeans. HPB thus conducts outreach and educational programmes to raise awareness among the public, including youths, on sexual health matters, such as the prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV and AIDS.
3        HPB tailors its sexual health education initiatives to the health concerns of specific target groups. HPB has identified Young Men Who have Sex with Men (YMSM) as one target group for STI and HIV education. To reach out to this group, HPB works with NGOs, VWOs and professional counsellors to produce educational resources.
4        The Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on sexuality and sexual health provide a one-stop resource of factual information from a public health perspective on sexuality, STI and HIV prevention. The FAQs were published on the HPB website in November 2013. The FAQs do not encourage same-sex relationships, but rather provide advice to young persons and their parents on mental and physical health issues from a public health perspective.
5        The FAQs also provide specific information to young people at risk of engaging in sexual behaviours which expose them to STI and HIV. The statement that “A same-sex relationship is not too different from a heterosexual relationship” and the statement that follows: “Both require the commitment of two people” should be taken together. They highlight that relationships require commitment, and it is possible to remain faithful to one’s partner, regardless of one’s sexual orientation. This drives home a key STI and HIV prevention message to “Be faithful” to one’s partner, rather than to have multiple partners. This helps to protect individuals from STIs and HIV, minimize transmission risks, and thereby safeguarding public health.
6        The HPB continually reviews its resources to keep them relevant, appropriate and effective in reaching out to target populations to help them make healthier choices. The Ministry of Health and HPB receive much valuable feedback from members of the public, expressing a diversity of views. HPB will take into consideration all relevant inputs in our reviews.

(Image from Mediacorp)

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

全国5万公共租屋 半数租户住超过10年

根据我国建屋发展局数据,我国有总数5万7819个公共租赁组屋单位,其中有半数租屋者已住了10年以上。 建屋局发布的2016/2017年度统计显示,有四分之一租屋者,在现有单位住少过五年。《海峡时报》引述建屋局数据,现有租屋者平均年龄43岁,而单身人士近四成,他们是单身联合住房计划申请者,或同住家人已过世。 去年,有4336人向该局提交租屋申请,而获批准为3千799人。在过去五年,有3千租屋居民,成功购得自己的组屋。 与总数约为95万座的出售式组屋相比,出租组屋单位占比仅为6巴仙。但是,新加坡国立大学社会学系陈恩赐副教授称,长期住在租赁组屋,可意味着根深蒂固的贫困问题没有解决。也有其他因素,例如财务状况、家庭问题等,促使居民继续租屋。 在政府租赁组屋计划下,提供无法负担拥屋的家庭租屋。家庭月入少于1千500元,即可申请租用。取决于单位大小,及申请者是否享有房屋津贴,月租从最低26元至275元不等。 这意味着,这半数仍未拥有“自己”房子的租户,可能来自中低收入群体。思及他们当中可能还有家庭子女,说明他们可能同时面对低收入瓶颈,以及生活成本高涨的压力。 已故资政李光耀曾坦言,政府从未想过要把组屋出租给人们,而是鼓励大多数人民自掏腰包买屋,以期实现居者有其屋,避免人民过于依赖政府长期津贴。

妻乘车挽丈夫肩膀 竟惹私召车司机苛责

妻子身体不适,乘坐私召车时挽着丈夫胳膊、头枕在丈夫肩膀上,却被女司机指责此“亲密”举动违法,甚至将事件闹到警察局去。 丈夫卓楷哲(Kohji Toh)在脸书账户上帖文,对于女司机的“诸多要求”表示非常不满,更表示会采取法律措施对付。 丈夫指出,他和妻子于上周三(15日)使用Grab服务,乘坐私召车赶赴一场下午5时30分的约会。 他们一上车后,女司机就要求他们绑上安全带,而他们也照做了。 妻子当时头疼发作,因此向丈夫要求挽胳膊、枕肩膀,却引起女司机的不满。女司机当时就警告他们,要求他们检点一些,更要他们坐在座位的两端。 有点摸不着头脑的丈夫当时就问女司机,为何如是要求,岂知女司机却表示他们的行为过于亲密了。 澄清两人是合法夫妻 这令丈夫感到不满,就表示他和妻子是合法夫妻,挽胳膊枕肩没有错。女司机却坚持他们的行为已经“违法”了,甚至警告要报警。 夫妻俩觉得备受侮辱,因此同意女司机报警,女司机也当场拨电报警,并将两人带到警察局去。 惟,可笑的是,女司机迷路了,甚至需要警车帮忙带路才能抵达警察局。更甚的是,警察在听完女司机的诉说后,表示夫妻俩没有犯错,他们并没有露出身体的任何部分,或“摸上摸下”。 丈夫将起诉女司机…

No physical rallies for GE campaign, candidates will be given more TV airtime

Physical rallies will not be allowed if the next general election (GE)…

Escalation of COVID-19 outbreak may affect timing of next General Election: DPM Heng Swee Keat

The escalation of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak may affect the timing…