By Andrew Loh
The FAQ on sexuality published by the Health Promotion Board (HPB) “drives home a key STI and HIV prevention message to ‘Be faithful’ to one’s partner, rather than to have multiple partners.” Health Minister Gan Kim Yong said in a written reply to MP Lim Biow Chuan on Monday.
Mr Lim had asked the minister to “explain why the Health Promotion Board promotes a same-sex relationship as not being different from a heterosexual relationship.”
Mr Lim had earlier said to the media that he was “disappointed” with the FAQ, and highlighted the part of the FAQ which said that a “same-sex relationship is not too different from a heterosexual relationship”.
In his explanation on Monday, Mr Gan said that the sentence should be read in context, along with what followed it – that “both require the commitment of two people.”
Mr Gan said, “They highlight that relationships require commitment, and it is possible to remain faithful to one’s partner, regardless of one’s sexual orientation.”
“This drives home a key STI and HIV prevention message to ‘Be faithful’ to one’s partner, rather than to have multiple partners. This helps to protect individuals from STIs and HIV, minimise transmission risks, and thereby safeguarding public health.”
As with the reply by the HPB on its Facebook page following the public reaction to the FAQ, Mr Gan emphasised that the Government’s policy is that the family is the basic building block of Singapore society and that it continues to encourage heterosexual married couples to have healthy relationships.
“The FAQs do not encourage same-sex relationships,” the Health minister said, “but rather provide advice to young persons and their parents on mental and physical health issues from a public health perspective.”
The FAQ, which was published about a week ago, attracted both praises and criticisms from different quarters. In particular, the LGBT community lauded it for being progressive and forward looking.
Some, however, see it as a backward step which they say will lead to the state legitimising homosexuality and eventually gay marriage.
Pastor Lawrence Khong, who once referred to the LGBT rights movement as the ‘onslaught of the evil one’ and who also seem to be the loudest opponent of the FAQ, is reported to have issued a guide to church leaders on how to campaign against the FAQ.
Among its suggestions is for members to not “use church or religious rankings or titles” when writing to MPs or ministers about the FAQ. Also, they should not “forward emails as this will leave traces of the contact chain and the thread of conversation from previous writers.”
The government has so far not responded to Pastor Khong.
———————
Here is the full reply from the Health Minister:

1        The Government’s policy is that the family is the basic building block of our society. This means encouraging heterosexual married couples to have healthy relationships and to build stable nuclear and extended family units. There has been no shift in the Government’s position on this. HPB takes reference from this consistent position in its health promotion activities.
2        The Health Promotion Board (HPB)’s mission is to promote healthy living for all Singaporeans. HPB thus conducts outreach and educational programmes to raise awareness among the public, including youths, on sexual health matters, such as the prevention of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV and AIDS.
3        HPB tailors its sexual health education initiatives to the health concerns of specific target groups. HPB has identified Young Men Who have Sex with Men (YMSM) as one target group for STI and HIV education. To reach out to this group, HPB works with NGOs, VWOs and professional counsellors to produce educational resources.
4        The Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on sexuality and sexual health provide a one-stop resource of factual information from a public health perspective on sexuality, STI and HIV prevention. The FAQs were published on the HPB website in November 2013. The FAQs do not encourage same-sex relationships, but rather provide advice to young persons and their parents on mental and physical health issues from a public health perspective.
5        The FAQs also provide specific information to young people at risk of engaging in sexual behaviours which expose them to STI and HIV. The statement that “A same-sex relationship is not too different from a heterosexual relationship” and the statement that follows: “Both require the commitment of two people” should be taken together. They highlight that relationships require commitment, and it is possible to remain faithful to one’s partner, regardless of one’s sexual orientation. This drives home a key STI and HIV prevention message to “Be faithful” to one’s partner, rather than to have multiple partners. This helps to protect individuals from STIs and HIV, minimize transmission risks, and thereby safeguarding public health.
6        The HPB continually reviews its resources to keep them relevant, appropriate and effective in reaching out to target populations to help them make healthier choices. The Ministry of Health and HPB receive much valuable feedback from members of the public, expressing a diversity of views. HPB will take into consideration all relevant inputs in our reviews.

(Image from Mediacorp)

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

工人党三领袖募捐诉讼费用 短短两日筹获近48万元

为应付市镇会诉讼案费用,工人党前党魁刘程强、主席林瑞莲和秘书长毕丹星,透过专为诉讼案设立的网站“秉诚行事”(in good faith),向公众募捐。截至昨晚10时,短短两日内,成功筹获47万7653元,捐款民众和单位达2千832人之多。 在两天前,筹款数目为6万5196元,翻倍达7倍之多。 网页中的募捐文告提到,目前三人面对两项诉讼,指控他们与另外两名市镇会理事会的理事,在管理市镇会时造成损失,并被索赔3千万元。 文告坚称以上指控不属实,指出他们“秉诚行事”,所作决策乃以居民和市镇会利益为依归。 文告称,从诉讼程序开始到现在,三人不会挪用工人党款项应对诉讼,而是动用自己的储蓄和朋友的资助,来支付近60万元的律师费。 目前,工人党市镇会风波诉讼已进行到第15日,预计整个诉讼审讯程序,还要进行到下月2日。 文告称,支付律师费用已经掏空了他们的个人的经济来源,他们急需资金打这场可能是他们面临破产的官司。 工人党澄清未以党名义为三领袖募捐 另一方面,担忧有心人士冒用工人党名义募捐,工人党在官方脸书专页,向支持者澄清,上述三名工人党领袖是以个人名义为诉讼案募款,工人党并未为他们展开任何募款。 “我们的三位国会议员是以他们个人的名义进行筹款。”…

This is my home: WP’s Chen Show Mao

The following is a translation of the report on Lianhe Zaobao on…

马国暂停发放签证给来自武汉、湖北旅客

据了解,马来西亚首相办公室宣布,即日起暂停为来自武汉和湖北游客,提供包括电子免签登记系统(eNTRI)、落地签证、电子签证和普通签证(visa manual)的入境便利。 相信此举是为应对2019年新型冠状病毒扩散周边地区的措施。 关文告称,马国政府是根据世界卫生组织规定程序以及专家意见,防堵疾病传播。 与此同时文告也呼吁各造停止散播未经证实假消息,避免引起社会恐慌。 邻国马来西亚是在本月25日,确认在柔佛州出现共四宗病例。其中三人与上述新加坡首宗确诊病例有亲属关系。三人是病患的妻子,和两名分别为两岁及11岁男孙。 他们一行10人在本月20日,从广州乘机飞抵新加坡渡假。之后66岁病患和儿子在本地确诊患武汉肺炎。 据了解有马国民众在网络发起联署,要求马国政府立即禁止中国公民入境马国,避免武汉肺炎散播。 截至今午(27日),该联署已累积超过36万9千网民参与联署。

High court dismisses application for judicial review of coroner’s discontinued inquiry.

Family of Dinesh Raman will appeal today’s decision SINGAPORE, October 16, 2013– Today,…