By Ravi Philemon

Mr Chow Chee Kin
Secretary
Committee of Inquiry into Little India Riot on 8 December 2013
Dear Mr Chow
Although I did not witness the Little India Riot first hand, I was at the recent fracas in Rex cinemas at Mackenzie Road where reportedly a crowd of more than 100 people, mostly foreign workers, refused to leave the cinema after the theatre cancelled the premiere of a Tamil movie.
I witnessed first-hand how the police officers who turned up for crowd control had difficulties communicating with the disgruntled moviegoers. One police officer I observed, used the word ‘Dei’, possibly in an attempt to establish camaraderie with the crowd. But in Tamil, the term ‘Dei’ is only used on people who are younger and/or are familiar (e.g. younger brother, close friends, etc), and is never used on people who are older and strangers as it is considered disrespectful. It was quite evident to me that the crowd’s inability to express their grievances clearly to the police officers, as well as the officers limited language ability prevented them from communicating effectively to one another. Because of this, at one point I also had to interpret for the police officers, and convey the wishes of the moviegoers to the police as well.
My full account of what happened in Rex cinema on Thursday, 9 January 2014 is here: (Facebook post)
Throughout the time I witnessed the police trying to resolve the dispute between the movie-going crowd and the cinema operators, I casually observed that there was only one police officer with an Indian name, but he did not speak much, and if he did, it was certainly not in Tamil. Things could have gone out of hand that night if not for cool heads, both the police officers on the ground and the moviegoers, who decided to seek extra help in understanding one another. Kudos to the police officers for that.
This incident made me reflect on the riot in Little India on 8 December 2013, and my questions are, how big a part did ability to comprehend language play in escalating the incident on that night of 8 December 2013, and could the incident been better mitigated with officers who were able to speak the language of the unhappy crowd?
Little India is a very unique place. It is the only place where tens of thousands of foreign workers, workers who probably speak very little English, congregate on weekends. I acknowledge that it might be impossible for all first-responders to be effective communicators in another language that might be foreign to them. But Tamil is one of our official languages.
Were sufficient Tamil speaking first-responders deployed for crowd control on the night of 8 December 2013 at Little India? If they were, what is that number? How effective (or ineffective) were they on that night?
Are officers who are able to speak our official languages, well represented in the Singapore Police Force and the Singapore Civil Defence Force, so that they can better communicate to the crowd in similar emergencies?
Besides Little India, there are other areas where foreign workers congregate on the weekends, could trained interpreters be recruited to be deployed at emergency situations which may require a particular language ability in order to avert a damaging situation?
I hope my feedback has been useful to the Committee. Please do not hesitate to contact me for any clarification.

Thank you.
This letter was first published at Ravi Philemon’s blog 
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

马总警长:刘特佐在澳门 马新合作查一马公司弊案

马来西亚总警长弗兹证实,大马警方前往香港准备逮捕大马年轻富豪刘特佐,惟后者已潜逃到澳门。 刘特佐曾透过律师接洽大马反贪污委员会,表示愿意针对一马公司弊案调查给予合作。他曾献议在杜拜会面,但是反贪会主席苏克里已表明,刘特佐必须返马接受调查。 马移民局从6月15日起,已撤销刘特佐护照,只要他入境不同国家,就会遭对付。 新加坡执法单位对邻国施予援手,继续调查一马公司弊案。在我国的要求下,国际刑警已在2016年10月,对刘特佐和同样涉案的商人陈金隆。发出红色通缉令。 美国司法部相信,陈金隆在许多涉案金钱转移,扮演刘特佐的代理,经其受转移多达23亿来自一马公司的资金,到不同的单位和个人,包括马国前首相纳吉。 新加坡助查一马案 新加坡金融管理局总监孟文能说,我国对一马公司案的调查仍未结束,该局仍在寻找和有意传召特定人士问话。 自2015年3月以来,新加坡一直向大马提供一马公司弊案相关资料,即便大马前朝政府没主动要求。“随着新政府上任,马方执法单位重启调查,我们一直都有紧密联系。“ 新加坡总检察署、新加坡警方和金管局。也在6月8日邀请阿都甘尼领导的一马公司调查团队,来我国商讨和分享调查事宜。 我国的调查揭露其中的交易网非常复杂, 涉及许多空壳公司和个人,遍及美国、瑞士、香港、卢森堡和马来西亚,牵涉到一马公司非法资金流动的银行甚至达8家,总罚款达到2千910万新元。 马国前首相纳吉在2015年透露,一马公司从开曼群岛赎回约11亿300万美元(约41亿令吉)资金,存入新加坡瑞意银行,而一马公司属下子公司Brazen…

缓刑不足一月再干案 前国民服役人员被判入狱16周

偷拍犯被判缓刑不满一个月又犯案,被逮捕后祈求再判缓刑,求情愿接受更多社区服务惩处,法官认为前者毫无悔意,判他入狱16周。 22岁的前国民服役人员林家俊(译音)在2018年服役期间,于11月29日下午2时许,在唐城坊的大创(Daiso)百货内,被人发现偷拍蹲下身选购商品的女子裙底视频,当场被逮捕。 警方随后在其手机内,发现了两小时内偷拍摄下的19个视频,因此将他控诉上庭。 他面对19项侮辱女性尊严的控状,控方主要针对六项控状提控,剩下的13项控状则交由法官考量。 被告在之前认罪,而今天(1月6日)上庭聆听审判时,却对刑法表示不满,提出上诉。 庭上揭露,被告在2019年11月8日,曾因为偷拍11个裙底视频,面对类似的提控而被判缓刑21个月。岂知,在服刑不到一个月,他又干案了。 要求以社区服务取代跟踪器 其代表律师表示,被告已经悔改了,所以在去年完成了约八个月,即2月至9月的心理治疗课程,并执行了120个小时的社区服务。他随后指出,在第二次的缓刑监视报告中,也显示了被告具备改造可能,因此请求法官再次判他缓刑。 他补充说,被告表示会对缓刑监视官员报备行踪,且会在工作之余继续接受心理治疗,以致生活充实而没有重犯的机会。 被告也表示,为了避免被银行“炒鱿鱼”,他恳请法官能够不要让他带着追踪器,而是以更多社区服务时段来取代。 然而控方指出,在接受刑法期间在干案,虽然被告承诺会继续服刑,但是明显没有悔改的意愿。 法官对于控方的立场表示认同,因此下判被告16周的监刑。

Conspiracy against Singapore – MM Lee

There is a conspiracy to do us in. Why?… They see us…

川金会实耗费1630万元 惟未公开开销明细

新加坡外交部披露,本月12日的美国总统川普与朝鲜领导人金正恩峰会的实际开销,为1千630万新元,比起早前新加坡总理李显龙所估计的费用,还低370万新元。 外交部在在本月24日的文告强调,大部分开销都花在保安事项。 虽然公布了实际花费,不过,该文告对于川金会具体开销细节并没有透露更多,例如政府究竟花了多少钱来尽“地主之谊”,承担金正恩一行人吃、住的费用。 究竟花了多少钱“尽地主之谊”? 金正恩在新期间下榻瑞吉酒店。《路透社》记者曾尝试探访金正恩和朝鲜代表团住宿酒店的开销,惟瑞吉酒店拒绝透露金正恩下榻的房间类型,和代表团占用多少客房。 新加坡瑞吉酒店的官方网站显示,豪华套房一晚要价5千新元,总统套房则超过9千新元。 新加坡政府也耗资5百万美元,接待和安顿近2500名前来采访川金会的国际媒体。 美国总统川普与朝鲜领导人金正恩在本月12日,在新加坡举行历史性会面。总理李显龙说,川金会是新加坡对国际作出的贡献,也符合本国的“深切利益”。 川普和金正恩在峰会期间达成协议,逐步落实朝鲜去核化,同时美国将致力维护该区域和平稳定。 在美朝领导人访新期间,政府部署了将近5千名警察和武装部队,确保峰会万无一失。 政府动用公帑承办川金会,引起新加坡公民抱怨,不过有评论员声称,新加坡为此次峰会投资物超所值,形同“用一碟鸡饭的价钱,换取区域的和平。”