casey2
The employer of Mr Anton Casey, whose Facebook postings have caused outrage among Singaporeans (and others), has said that Casey’s comments “were made in poor taste.”
Mr Casey’s firm Crossinvest Asia is investigating his comments and is set to take “appropriate action” once the review is completed, British newspaper, The Independent reported.
In a statement, Managing director Christophe Audergon said: “Crossinvest does not condone the comments. We believe they were made in poor taste.”
Casey’s comments mocked “poor people” who took the train, ridiculed S’pore’s public transport system, and called a taxi driver a “retard”, in a series of abusive remarks online.
Casey had posted, on his Facebook page, a picture of his son sitting on a train with the caption: “Daddy, where is your car and who are all these poor people?”
Another photo shows his son in Casey’s Porsche, with an equally offensive caption: “Ahhhh reunited with my baby. Normal service can resume, once I have washed the stench of public transport off me.”
Facing the backlash from his insults, Casey tendered an apology.
“I deeply regret having offended and disrespected the people of Singapore,” he said. “I have the highest respect and regard for Singapore and the good people of Singapore; this is my home.”
Casey, who is married to a former Miss Singapore, claimed that there was a “security breach” of his Facebook page and that an old video of his which had surfaced was “misused”.
“I don’t mean to offend anyone,” he said in that video. “Don’t be angry at me. Be angry with your mum and dad for raising you a wuss.”
However, Casey said that the video was made earlier and was not a response to the public backlash. He said: “It must be made extremely clear that a YouTube video of me, with my son in the background, was not posted in response to any recent events. This video was made weeks prior and has been misused to portray me as unrepentant.”
He said that his family, especially his son, “suffered extreme emotional and verbal abuse online”.
Casey, who is believed to live in Singapore’s posh Sentosa Cove on Sentosa island, also said that he has received death threats following the posting.
Nonetheless, he said:
casey 5“I wish for nothing more than to be forgiven for my poor judgement and given a second chance to rebuild the trust people have had in me as a resident of this wonderful country.”
However, the outrage has not abated, and reaction from the public online continues to criticise his behaviour.
A police report by a member of the public is believed to have been lodged against Casey for his posting.
In his statement, Auderon also said, “Crossinvest has clear policies regarding the codes of conduct expected of its employees. That code of conduct extends to social media. We are currently investigating the comments made by our employee and will take appropriate action once we are in possession of all the facts.”
Singapore’s Law Minister, K Shanmugam, has given his views on the matter. Posting on his Facebook page, Shanmugam said:

“I have been asked what I thought of Mr Anton Casey and his statements. Like many Singaporeans, I am terribly upset and offended by what he has posted. Deeply offensive, wrong, and unacceptable.
“Those who have done well in life should always be looking out for others – especially the less well-off or needy. It is basic human decency. Instead Mr Casey showed contempt. Having money and a Porsche, does not automatically mean that one is superior. Character is important.
“I am glad the community has come together to condemn what he has said.
“He has attempted to apologise to Singaporeans. But some feel that the manner of his apology showed a lack of sincerity. And I think there is some basis for thinking that.
“At the same time, I hope that Singaporeans will not attack or flame his family because of his actions. We, Singaporeans, can be bigger than that.”

The British press has picked up on the story. You can read them here:
The Independent: Singapore after mocking “poor people” calling a taxi driver a “retard”
The Telegraph: British businessman receives death threats in Singapore over Facebook comments
The Guardian: British banker receives death threats for anti-Singapore diatribe
Daily Mail: British banker: I need to wash off the stench of public transport used by the poor

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

120 cases of COVID-19 infection confirmed; Highest ever spike of cases

As of Sunday (5 April), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has confirmed…

打脸总理选举承诺 民主党视频遭网民疯传

民主党秘书长徐顺全在本月2日上载一则视频,获得超过28万的高点击率,以及7千余次分享:视频内容针对剪接总理李显龙在2015年选举承诺,再对比新加坡人面对的残酷现实,引起不少国人共鸣。 这则题为“别随便说说”(Don’t Anyhow Say Things)的视频,开端剪接贸工部长陈振声,在演说时的一段话:“必须谨慎,不要因为是选举季节,就随便说说”。意思就是,政治人物要说到做到,不应随便许下承诺,但却没办法履行。 接着,视频就穿插人民行动党秘书长李显龙,在上届选举的演讲片段,针对其许下的种种承诺,配以国人面对现实处境,一一作出讽刺性的对比。 李显龙提及现今领袖,具备建国元勋的精神,但这段民主党制作的视频,即引用前任首席公务员严崇涛的说辞,指在早期,林金山和吴庆瑞博士从早忙到晚不求回报,但是当把部长薪资调高,情况就开始走下坡。 李显龙称确保建国一代和乐龄群体过上有尊严的生活,但视频引用李光耀公共政策学院黄国豪(译音)教授的说法,指乐龄打工群体的贫穷率显著上升;而今年的报导也显示年长者自杀率比往年高。 至于李显龙承诺提供年轻人可负担、能保值的房屋,国际可负担住宿调查就显示,我国的房产“严重不可负担”;而公共组屋屋契只有99年,到期后就归零。 至于我们的公积金,半数退休者甚至未达到最低储蓄额标准;在2017年,超过20巴仙毕业生近半个月找不到工作,以及我国千禧世代在2016年被评为对就业前景最悲观的群体。 此外,视频也抨击,当前新加坡人工时最长、工作压力最大;李显龙自称是国家的看管者,实则在实行贵族统治;以及年轻运动员无法获得国民服役延期,参加国际足球队等等问题。 李显龙:“所以我们和人民一起,解决生活成本问题,让生活更美好,减轻负担。”…

MP Ho Geok Choo & the “Politics of Envy” Revisited

By Singapore Kopi Tok Peering at the storm around Singapore recently, is…

公开招揽越南人才惹争议 NasDaily澄清非在新加坡工作

以拍摄一分钟视频见闻、刚到我国旅居的网红Nas daily(本名Nuseir Yassin,亚新),近日因招聘越南人而惹争议。随后,亚新于8月17日澄清,该名越南人将在越南工作,他们在新加坡受训数月后,回到越南,并不会留在新加坡。 上周一(12日),亚新于公司脸书上发出帖文,有意招聘一名越南籍人员,加入新加坡团队负责制作和拍摄视频,帖文还表示,若有人推荐成功将可获得500美元(约690新元)酬劳。 该招聘文贴出后,引起网民舆论,认为亚新并没有优先考虑本地人的利益。 对此,亚新于周六(17日)向《海峡时报》澄清,由于越南市场正迅速发展,故想招聘当地人,好让他可制作最符合越南市场的视频,待招聘的越南人将本地受训数月后,回到越南工作,他并不会留在新加坡。 “这(招聘越南人)我想要招聘最好的视频制作人加入团队,只有他们最了解当地的文化,作出最道地的视频”,他说。 他还续指,目前公司已招聘五名新加坡人,“我们将总部设在新加坡,所以我们一直以招聘本地人为主,另外我们还开始了“亚新大学”(Nas Unversity),欲传授本地制作视频技巧给新加坡人。” 他也称公司在四个月内已贡献100万元给本地经济,另外有200万元也即将从国际客户中获得。 面对媒体询问,劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟表示,所有雇主都该遵循劳资政准则的公平雇佣条例。所有本地的工作职位都以该准则为标准,无论招聘广告登在哪个媒介上。该准则下,任何“不包括本地人”,或指明要“聘用非本地人”的文字与词语,都不应出现。 企业须现在职业库优先招募本地人…