Manpower Minister Tan Chuan Jin
Manpower Minister Tan Chuan Jin
To prevent the “large congregations [of foreign workers] at popular areas”, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) is considering rotating the off days of these workers. The ministry is exploring such a possibility with employers.
This was revealed by MOM Minister, Tan Chuan Jin, in Parliament on Monday.
It is unclear why the government wants to prevent such “large congregations” but the minister said that more “dedicated gathering spaces” for foreign workers will be launched in the future.
These moves come after the riot in Little India in December last year where a reported “400” workers were said to be involved. Some 26 workers are being charged for the incident while 57 others have been repatriated.
Mr Tan also said that the government recognises the need to build more dormitories for the workers, and there will be more such accommodation built in the next 2 to 3 years, a point made by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong last month.
These self-contained, purpose-built dormitories will have facilities such as gyms, canteens, television rooms and computer access.
Nonetheless, the minister said that places like Little India have “naturally evolved over time to cater to foreign workers’ physical and, importantly, their emotional needs”, and that alternative recreation spots specially catered for foreign workers will never totally replace such organic shared spaces.
Mr Tan said, “Foreign workers need a place to come together, to gather, to catch up with old friends, catch up on news from the village, have a taste of food from home, meet friends, relatives from across the island for the few precious hours that they have.”
Dismissing suggestions that the riot in December could have been caused by the workers’ unhappiness over “widespread abuse”, Mr Tan said there was “no basis” for such a suggestion.
Foreign workers here are, generally, treated well by their employers, Mr Tan told the House in his ministerial statement on the riot. He said that the problems and complaints by foreign workers make up a very small fraction of the 700,000 work permit holders here.
Some non-governmental organisations and commentators have pointed the finger at such possible abuse of the workers as a potential spark for the riot. While Mr Tan dismissed these suggestions, he said he looked forward to the Committee of Inquiry’s (COI) perspective on the matter.
The 4-member COI was appointed by Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean on 13 December to investigate the cause of the riot. It is being headed by former Supreme Court Judge, G Pannir Selvam.
Mr Tan said that surveys conducted by the government showed that the “vast majority of foreign workers are satisfied with their overall experience working in Singapore and find the country to be an attractive destination to earn a living”, according to a Channel Newasia report. [See here.]

“Based on surveys conducted in November 2013 with over 150 departing foreign workers, he said the results showed that over 90 per cent did not have any employment issues; and 80 per cent were happy working in Singapore.”

The number of Work Permit holders in Singapore is 970,600 as of June 2013. [See MOM website here.] However, activists and aid workers involved with the migrant workers’ community say that the number of abuse is more widespread than the statistics show.
Mr Russell Heng, president of migrant workers NGO TWC2, wrote in the Straits Times on 10 December, two days after the riot:
“The foreign worker communities here have been at the receiving end of employment unfairness for a long time. Many do not receive correct salaries, or have no way – in the absence of payslips – to check whether they have been correctly paid. Some have not been paid for months; TWC2 sees a regular stream of such complaints.”
As for the lack of recreational space for the workers, TWC2 said in December:
“As for ‘spreading out the gathering points’, we must remember that people are free to choose where they want to go. It takes a whole eco-system of shops, restaurants, and fellow countrymen’s preferences to create a popular location. It is better to upgrade facilities and add extra amenities within Little India than to try to go the whole hog of social engineering.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

毕丹星回应《一条无障碍坡道》评论 点评“P.A.(P)式”民主

在上月26日,《联合早报》发布一篇由高级记者黄伟曼撰写的评论《一条无障碍坡道》,其中提及: “以目前围绕这起事件的舆论来评断,多数选民估计不太懂,也不太在乎在反对党区内市镇会与人协之间微妙的相处模式。 他们的思考逻辑很简单,即一条应惠及老弱残病等有需要者的无障碍通道的建造被拖延了,而若这背后可能有基层政治操作,那必然违反公平原则,在这过程中也牺牲了人民的利益,不能被接受。” 对此,工人党秘书长暨阿裕尼集选区议员毕丹星回应,针对上述第一段的说法,或许作者就已忽略,败选行动党候选人,仍能被委任为人民协会基层顾问,本身就有违民主。 至于是否公平原则,毕丹星认为,要探究人协在反对党选区的立场,不仅仅限于讨论对坡道建设的冷漠态度。他解释,败选行动党基层顾问不仅掌控纳税人的钱,他们的影响力更为深远和政治化,早已不是什么秘密。 他在昨日发布的脸书贴文列举其中一些例子:包括公民权仪式,由行动党政府委任的基层顾问主持,而在反对党选区,新公民是从败选行动党候选人手上领过身份证的,“难道总统旗下的公务员,或非政治人物来主持这类仪式,不是更妥当吗?” 至于市镇理事会靠“两条腿”:民选议员和基层领袖方能成事。市镇会不仅把建屋局权限赋予议员,也交予基层领袖。然而,如果不是在人协旗下的基层代表,行动党政府是不会予以承认的,反对党志愿者也不会得到基层身份。 故此,毕丹星指出在反对党选区,市镇会无基层代表;而基层领袖是由败选行动党候选人委任、受基层顾问管理的。 其三,社区设施改进委员会(CIPC)审批拨款,在人协缺席的情况,反对党市镇会只好依靠自己的盈余来支撑惠民项目,他指阿裕尼-后港市镇会多年来都是这么做;但与此同时行动党市镇会却可以透过CIPC拨款进行项目,而得以保持财政盈余。 即便如此,当阿裕尼-后港市镇会在2011年出现赤字,《海峡时报》甚至还质问“市镇会此前的300万盈余去了哪?” 最后,毕丹星反问,行动党在管理人协上,究竟政治和国人利益孰轻孰重? “答案或许不言而喻,我希望更多记者和政治观察员,可以超越国内目前最著名坡道议题,看得更为深远,去分析拖延建设的政治机制。诚如“选民的逻辑”,建设性政治岂非更应着重公平吗?”

【冠状病毒19】确诊病例曾到访麟谷峇鲁职总超市及储蓄银行

卫生部列出冠状病毒确诊病例曾到过的新地点,包括曾于本月9日到过麟谷峇鲁(Lengkok Bahru)一带的职总平价超市,呼吁民众关注。 卫生部昨晚(6月14日)发文告,列出确诊病例曾到访过的新增地点和时段。 其中,有确诊病例曾于本月2日中午12时至1时30分,到加基武吉休闲中心(Kaki Bukit Recreation Centre)的储蓄银行,并于本月9日晚上8时15分至8时45分,曾到过麟谷峇鲁20号的职总平价超市。 当局指出,公布相关地点时段,主要是促请曾于相关时段,出现在相关地点的民众提高醒觉,关注自身健康状况,民众没有必要避开到访。若有出现发烧、失去味觉或嗅觉、或有急性呼吸道感染症状的民众,受促尽快就医,并告知曾去过的地点。

MP Pritam Singh is all praise for WP volunteers who are not recognised by PA as grassroots representatives

Aljunied GRC Member of Parliament (MP) and Workers’ Party chief Pritam Singh…

SDP Chief Chee Soon Juan slams PAP for "playing politics" when lives are at stake

PAP should “stop playing politics when our lives and our health are…