(Photo: Worker writing how much he is owed in pay)
Straits Times reported that Ministry of Manpower (MOM), the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and the Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF) MOM, NTUC and SNEF has developed guidelines on how employers can issue itemised payslips (Straits Times, Jan 13).
Guidelines for payslips?
It states that employers can now refer to a set of guidelines on how to issue itemised payslips to employees and what information to include in them.
The tripartite guidelines which are developed by MOM, NTUC and SNEF, provide templates of payslips that companies may use and customise based on their own needs. According to the guidelines, the payslip should indicate and record items such as basic salary, total allowances and total deductions for each salary period.
No payslips” problem for a long time?
For years, a lot of people, including migrant worker NGOs have been asking for pay slips to be made mandatory, because it may be problematic when workers complain that they have not been paid or underpaid.
MOM said in a press release on Monday that the tripartite partners agree that the provision of itemised payslips to employees is a good employment practice as it raises employee’s awareness of their salary components and helps in resolving salary disputes.
And the ministry intends to mandate the issuance of itemised payslips within the next two year and added that the guidelines were developed after consultations with various stakeholders.
But does it not make you wonder why such a simple thing as having a pay slip needs to take years – involve so many organizations, processes, guidelines, etc?
The ministry then said in the press release that it received feedback that many smaller SMEs (small and medium enterprises), especially enterprises such as ‘mom and pop’ shops and hawkers, find issuing itemised payslips challenging. And the guidelines aim to prepare these businesses to change their practices in a sustainable way, so that they are able to comply when the ministry make it a legal requirement for payslip to be issued.
The question that follows this is why then can’t we make it mandatory and provide assistance to so called ‘mom and pop’ shops and hawkers – like for example what the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) has been doing so well for many years for tax submission?
If something so complicated as income tax can be done for assistance – why is it so difficult for a payslip?
How many items or combination of items can there be in a payslip that requires so many templates, guidelines, changing practices in a sustainable way, etc?
As I understand it, most if not all of the complaints and salary disputes are I understand not from so called ‘mom and pop’ shops and hawkers?
If indeed I am mistaken in this regard – can the statistics be given as to how many ‘mom and pop” shops and hawkers had salary disputes and complaints, relative to the total number of complaints?
Super complicated payslip?
The ministry said that it  is also working with the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore and SPRING Singapore to, by April 2014, provide tools such as simple payslip booklets, downloadable templates, and funding support for companies to develop customised solutions regarding the issuance of payslips. But don’t you get the feeling that its like “much ado over nothing”?
I mean after all – it’s just a simple one page payslip – can’t be so complicated that we seem to be talking about it like “rocket science”?
Labour movement?
Perhaps the labour movement’s statement tops it all, as to how arguably, farcical – this issue of payslips is becoming:
The Labour Movement  issued a statement in which it said:

The Labour Movement welcomes these guidelines as it would translate to greater transparency for workers. Providing workers with itemised payslips will go some way to help them better understand their salary components as well as provide a means of proper documentation.
On the part of workers, we encourage them to keep their payslips properly and clarify with their employers or HR personnel if they do not understand any of the components listed in their payslips.

Uniquely Singapore!
By Leong Sze Hian

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

指覃炳鑫谎报资历 陈华彪轰特委会”人格谋杀“

国会研究蓄意散播假消息特选委员会,在报告中指出,历史学者覃炳鑫“撒谎、自抬身份“、罔顾那些否定他虚假指控的资料,事后也没遵守自己的承诺,说明自己如何已间接核实了相关资料,才作出指控。 覃炳鑫虽有提供口头陈述,但是委员会以前者歪曲自身学术资历为由,不是可靠的供证者,完全不考量他的意见。 律政部长兼特委会成员尚穆根向媒体表示,委员会的结论是,覃炳鑫谎报自己的学历和学术职位,因此他的陈述不可信。 覃炳鑫也辩称冷藏行动不存在对国家的安全威胁,当他被质疑时,却承认没有阅读或没有将马来亚共产党资深党员的论述考虑在内。最后覃炳鑫也没有提供文件,跟进他所提出的论述。 对异议者的人格诋毁 此事也立即引来公民组织的炮轰。前学运领袖、流亡异议份子陈华彪就批评,这是针对我们最优秀、最勇敢公民的另一次人格诋毁行动。 “新加坡的统治集团,真的往污秽的地沟钻。现在被行动党诬陷为骗子,竟然成了一种荣誉的勋章。尚穆根、选委会和你的跟班们,都应该感到可耻。” 他直言,如果行动党非得以这种手段来延续权力,只能祈求上苍保佑新加坡。 “要不然,只有人民才能把国家从这群卑鄙小人的手上拯救过来。” 覃炳鑫资历受牛津大学认可 许多网民都替覃炳鑫抱不平,也把今年四月,由牛津大学东南亚项目信托人的联署声明,上载到留言中。声明中称,覃炳鑫是东南亚项目协调员,也是信托委会成员之一,他是研究新加坡上世纪50-609年代独立斗争的历史学家。 ”自2011年在牛津大学完成博士学位以来,仍继续进行研究,特别是审视英国政府在当代的文件,并向大众发表其研究发现。“…

Bloggers question Tochi’s execution

This is a summary of what some bloggers are saying about the…

SDP’s Mansura Sajahan calls out Minister Ong Ye Kung for being "very irresponsible" for not making it compulsory for students to wear mask

Earlier on 21 May, Education Minister Ong Ye Kung addressed some of…

工人党劳动节向医疗人员致谢 放眼后冠病时代对工友辅助措施

工人党认为,今年的五一劳动节有别以往,新加坡此时必须全力抗疫,受到疫情影响,也可能面对自独立以来最严重的经济衰退。 该党在五一劳动节发文告,祝福和全力支持前线医疗人员,“举国上下对您们的牺牲奉献无以回报”。 与此同时,该党也关注那些在非必要领域服务的工友和自顾人士。在阻断措施下不少人的收入都受到影响,更何况并非所有人的工作性质都适合在家工作。故此,该党呼吁全国人民齐心对抗当前疫情。 该党分析,在冠病疫情冲击前,我国去年的GDP增长就已减弱至0.7巴仙。再者,也面对工业4.0的颠覆、地域性政治紧张、以及全国供应链受影响等课题。 放眼冠状病毒19疫情危机后,工人党倡议以下措施以扶助工友: 随着各行业领域迅速颠覆,应有更灵活的措施让工友们持续成长。过去工人党也倡议设立冗员保险(Redundancy Insurance)让工友们能从危机中回缓。 此外,也应让公积金有更好的回报;或允许可提取户头中超过最低存款额的部分公积金,作为紧急资金。 工人党呼吁更公平对待工友,不会因为性别、种族或身为新加坡公民受到歧视。对于那些仰仗组屋作为退休计划的国人,也应支持合理的组屋转售价值。 该党也呼吁,应为那些为家户创造就业机会的企业家提供支持,透过培训和激励措施投资于人民和本土公司,以期他们不会因为生活成本感到负担过重,而得以有足够信心抓住商机、勇于冒险和创新。 该党也不忘提醒,我们同样也必须对来到我国工作的外籍工人负起责任,提供他们体面、有尊严的生活和工作条件。