By Andrew Loh –
BD1
This Thursday, the Public Transport Council (PTC) will announce its decision on whether the fare revision application from the public transport operators (PTOs) is approved.
To most Singaporeans, the decision is almost a done deal. This is even more certain given that the Transport Minister on Monday said the government is ready with help schemes for needy.
“I told him [PTC chairman, Gerard Ee] that the Government was ready with our package for the low income workers (LIW) and persons with disabilities (PWD) and that we would like to announce this together on Thursday,” Mr Lui said. “These two concession schemes will be fully funded by the Government.”
Mr Lui’s remarks, made on his Facebook page, [click here] immediately drew angry responses from the public. Most of the 158 comments, at the time of writing, were directed at how unfair it would be for fares to be raised, given that in the last few years service was below par.
Nur Azlinawaty Abdul Rahman wrote: “Dear Mr Lui, major improvements in service on every level, ranging from the timeliness to condition of the public transport, are needed and should be above par (and not on par) before any price increase is warranted.”
Jeremy Speaks said: “Breakdowns are still happening, and are we going to take that as a norm from now on? Please, don’t reward a private transport company which keeps earning good profits yet performs poorly in both capacity and frequency.”
“This must be the only place on this planet where prices go up despite deterioration in service standards,” Riduwan Matni posted on Lui’s page. “While management gurus advocate increase in profits from improved customer service, seems like this Government actually teaches the very opposite – profits of supposed private company can be fattened, at public coffers expense, while service standards is lackadaisical at best.”
Indeed, service standards of the trains, especially, have been below expectations, with breakdowns now a common and regular occurrence. What has added to the anger among the commuting public is also the fact that the government last year announced a S$1.1 billion handout to the PTOs to purchase 800 buses and also for their maintenance over the next 10 years. And just last week, the Transport Minister also announced a new “stick-and-carrot” reward scheme where the PTOs could be rewarded more substantially – up to S$6,000 – if their buses arrived earlier at their destinations. Singaporeans saw this as an unfair reward for the PTOs for doing what they should be doing in the first place.
A quick glance back to the last three years shows why Singaporeans are so upset with the expected fare increase.
BD2
In 2011, the trains were so packed that during one of the breakdowns, a commuter had to break the glass windows in order for air to enter into the cabin.
PTC1
In 2012, breakdowns led to long queues for buses for the thousands who were affected.
ptc2
ptc3
 
ptc4
The disruptions continued into 2013…
ptc5
Pictured above are commuters squeezing into the train at Jurong East station.
ptc6
Fire broke out at the Newton station in February last year.
ptc7
py8a
Disruption at Braddell station.
ptc8
ptc9
Ang Mo Kio station in April.
ptc10
At the NEL line…
ptc11
ptc12
ptc13
Yishun crowd.
ptc14
Kembangan station.
ptc15
ptc16
ptc17
ptc18
27 December 2013, train disruption due to a child:
ptc19
And from 2011 to 2012, to 2013, the endless disruptions continued into 2014.
Just 11 days into the new year, another breakdown happened:
ptc20
ptc21
ptc22
One does not know when all these disruptions will end, or if they ever will.
But it is clear to most people that it would be totally unfair and indeed irresponsible for the PTC to approve any fare hikes for the PTOs – given that the government has provided them S$1.1 billion of taxpayers’ money and that the PTOs themselves are making very healthy profits every year running into the hundreds of millions of dollars.
In short, Singaporeans and the commuting public want to see the PTC do the right thing – to grow a spine and dismiss the PTOs’ application to hike fares.
It really is time for the PTC to listen to the public.
“I think Singapore is the only country in the world where the government comes out to speak up for ‘private’ listed companies and ensure that their profits are protected,” said Keniro Piongiro on Lui’s page.
It is high time the PTC stood with commuters and reject the fare hike applications by the PTOs.
*Special thanks to Lovecraft RavenEve for the pictures.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

马国首相:若人民认为有需要,或探讨重新落实消费税

马来西亚自去年国阵政府败选后,新政府上任随即宣布取消消费税,以销售与服务税(SST)取代。但近日,政府却表示,若人民认为有需要,或探讨重启消费税(GST)。 首相敦马今日出席内政部安全与公共秩序推介礼,有记者提出马国经济研究院(MIER) 曾指应该重启消费税,并将税率调整至3巴仙,敦马针对此事作出回应。 “如果这是公众需求,我们会探讨会对此进行研究”,他表示。但敦马也表明,该项目不会列入2020年的财政预算案。 据悉,销售及服务税(SST)是只针对特定对象,如生产商或进口商及一些服务业者,但消费税的征税对象几乎涵盖所有人,只要有消费就必须缴税。换言之,从生产商、批发商、零售商、进出口商到最终的消费者,每个层面都必须缴税。但销售及服务税只针对特定对象,如生产商或进口商及一些服务业者。 但SST落实后,许多人仍投诉物价并因此下降,因此民怨四起。日前,《诗华日报》报导,大马经济研究院(MIER)也呼吁政府在2020年财政预算案中,以3%的较低税率,重新落实物品及消费税(GST)。经济智囊机构主席丹斯里卡玛沙烈(Tan Sri Kamal Salih)形容消费税反而更显公平,而且该系统也在2015年原油价格下跌至每桶36美元时,平衡了政府的收入来源。 对此,马国消费人联合会(FOMCA)则表示,消费税已给予众人许多负面形象,例如以往6巴仙税率,特别是在必需品上,已经给人民带来很重的负担,故若要重启恐怕不易实行。

Singapore’s healthcare system – uniquely Singapore? (Part 2)

This is part 2 of a 3-part focus on healthcare in Singapore.…

Excuse me, have you seen Raymond and Kan Seng?

Andrew Loh – Almost a month ago, on 17 May, Swiss national…

Phishing emails lure victims into revealing their personal particulars and bank account details

Singapore Police Force (SPF) has stated that it received several reports of…