By Andrew Loh –
BD1
This Thursday, the Public Transport Council (PTC) will announce its decision on whether the fare revision application from the public transport operators (PTOs) is approved.
To most Singaporeans, the decision is almost a done deal. This is even more certain given that the Transport Minister on Monday said the government is ready with help schemes for needy.
“I told him [PTC chairman, Gerard Ee] that the Government was ready with our package for the low income workers (LIW) and persons with disabilities (PWD) and that we would like to announce this together on Thursday,” Mr Lui said. “These two concession schemes will be fully funded by the Government.”
Mr Lui’s remarks, made on his Facebook page, [click here] immediately drew angry responses from the public. Most of the 158 comments, at the time of writing, were directed at how unfair it would be for fares to be raised, given that in the last few years service was below par.
Nur Azlinawaty Abdul Rahman wrote: “Dear Mr Lui, major improvements in service on every level, ranging from the timeliness to condition of the public transport, are needed and should be above par (and not on par) before any price increase is warranted.”
Jeremy Speaks said: “Breakdowns are still happening, and are we going to take that as a norm from now on? Please, don’t reward a private transport company which keeps earning good profits yet performs poorly in both capacity and frequency.”
“This must be the only place on this planet where prices go up despite deterioration in service standards,” Riduwan Matni posted on Lui’s page. “While management gurus advocate increase in profits from improved customer service, seems like this Government actually teaches the very opposite – profits of supposed private company can be fattened, at public coffers expense, while service standards is lackadaisical at best.”
Indeed, service standards of the trains, especially, have been below expectations, with breakdowns now a common and regular occurrence. What has added to the anger among the commuting public is also the fact that the government last year announced a S$1.1 billion handout to the PTOs to purchase 800 buses and also for their maintenance over the next 10 years. And just last week, the Transport Minister also announced a new “stick-and-carrot” reward scheme where the PTOs could be rewarded more substantially – up to S$6,000 – if their buses arrived earlier at their destinations. Singaporeans saw this as an unfair reward for the PTOs for doing what they should be doing in the first place.
A quick glance back to the last three years shows why Singaporeans are so upset with the expected fare increase.
BD2
In 2011, the trains were so packed that during one of the breakdowns, a commuter had to break the glass windows in order for air to enter into the cabin.
PTC1
In 2012, breakdowns led to long queues for buses for the thousands who were affected.
ptc2
ptc3
 
ptc4
The disruptions continued into 2013…
ptc5
Pictured above are commuters squeezing into the train at Jurong East station.
ptc6
Fire broke out at the Newton station in February last year.
ptc7
py8a
Disruption at Braddell station.
ptc8
ptc9
Ang Mo Kio station in April.
ptc10
At the NEL line…
ptc11
ptc12
ptc13
Yishun crowd.
ptc14
Kembangan station.
ptc15
ptc16
ptc17
ptc18
27 December 2013, train disruption due to a child:
ptc19
And from 2011 to 2012, to 2013, the endless disruptions continued into 2014.
Just 11 days into the new year, another breakdown happened:
ptc20
ptc21
ptc22
One does not know when all these disruptions will end, or if they ever will.
But it is clear to most people that it would be totally unfair and indeed irresponsible for the PTC to approve any fare hikes for the PTOs – given that the government has provided them S$1.1 billion of taxpayers’ money and that the PTOs themselves are making very healthy profits every year running into the hundreds of millions of dollars.
In short, Singaporeans and the commuting public want to see the PTC do the right thing – to grow a spine and dismiss the PTOs’ application to hike fares.
It really is time for the PTC to listen to the public.
“I think Singapore is the only country in the world where the government comes out to speak up for ‘private’ listed companies and ensure that their profits are protected,” said Keniro Piongiro on Lui’s page.
It is high time the PTC stood with commuters and reject the fare hike applications by the PTOs.
*Special thanks to Lovecraft RavenEve for the pictures.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

S’pore and HK may expect rise in imported cases of COVID-19 as more travellers flow into each city

In light of the coronavirus pandemic worldwide, Hong Kong and Singapore seem…

Amos Yee sent to hospital

UPDATE [6.54am, Monday, 6 July]: The Online Citizen understands that Amos Yee…

未能保障客工居住环境 张素兰批政府当前举措如在“灭火”

光谱行动前政治扣留者、维权律师张素兰,发文批评人力部在处理客工的课题上,未能保障客工宿舍生活条件、居住环境合理。 张素兰表示,四月是炎热季节的高峰,在我国炎热与潮湿的环境底下,想象客工们挤在拥挤的宿舍内,还要忍受着混凝土建筑的高温,这是一件多么痛苦的一件事。 “混凝土建筑物所带来的高温总是难以忍受,而且四月是炎热季节的高峰。甚至都有可能会在新加坡发生山火的季节,所以我非常了解被限制在一间小房间内,而且高温也迎面而来的感觉,就如同待在炉子内一般难以忍受。” 张素兰继指,如今也能证明,在过去十几年间,政府都未能为客工提供很好的照顾的事实。 至于要求客工要24小时内待在宿舍,张素兰提出质疑,“如今还要客工全天24小时都待在宿舍内,人力部又该如何管理这些客工?”,同时也呼吁应该要让独立记者入宿舍内进行采访,理解客工的生活条件。 把客工和本地社群区分开来 针对政府未能给予客工更好的居住环境,张素兰认为在一开始爆发客工确诊时,已然显而易见。她表示,当时就已经将客工与非客工作出明确区分。至于为何要做出区分,张素兰则认为是因为客工并非新加坡公民,无法算作大选时的选票。 她也直指,由于多年来忽视对客工的照顾,亦导致如今大量客工确诊的情况,而今大量的客工确诊也让政府“火烧屁股”,他们才不断推出一些措施“灭火”。 此外,张素兰也质问,如果政府在过去三周内都未能有效隔离患者,那要求他们关在炎热潮湿的房内的意义何在? “从我收集的报道,目前只有确诊病例会是被隔离的,而其他人则是不允许在周围移动,即使房内有人被确诊了,其余客工也只会被要求留在房内。” 最后,张素兰也呼吁政府应该给予客工更好的对待,尤其在近期内国际媒体已大肆报道政府如何对待客工的事实,因此也无需否认事实的存在,而且这些“事实”已逐渐损害了我国的良好的声誉,所以才要更好的对待客工。 “如果新加坡以这种方式对待客工,又该如何被称为第一世界国家,又该如何与挪威、瑞典、德国和日本相比?如果新加坡真的想被称为第一世界国家,那我们应该善待客工。”