By Nix

cockburn

I work in the south-western region of metropolitian Perth. So it is an everyday thing to drive past through the City of Cockburn. Lately I spotted some curious signage all over the city that cried, “Hands off Cockburn!” Many of these signage were not professionally made. Some were even handwritten and erected casually by the side of the road. However, the messages on these were far from casual and I could feel the messengers were dead serious about that.The protestants were residents of Cockburn. (pronounced as Ko-burn, in case you have a picture of a charred dick in your mind) They were protesting against the state government’s intention to break up the City of Cockburn and merge the northern and southern parts to the City of Melville and Kwinana respectively. My curiosity with the random signs led me to do a brief read up online and learnt that the Cockburn community actually held a protest outside the Parliament House last month to have their voices heard: They did not want their City to be carved up and given to other councils.

At the rally, the Cockburn community submitted its own proposal, (I will spare you the details) along with almost 11,000 signatures from the electors showing the community support for their proposals. What impressed me was the committee behind this only took ten days to come out with a 100-page proposal and manage to amass close to 11,000 people to support it. Quite a feat, if you think about how logistically challenged it is for them to do so as compared to our situation in Singapore. That only tells me one thing, the community spirit is very strong over here, much like the Kampong Spirit that used to exist many pockets of Singapore.

These protestants would be arrested by the police if they had done that in Singapore. One would wonder why. Did the protest (shown above) look like a Little India riot to you? Were the protestants violent or disorder? No. Did they cause public inconveniences? No. The most important question Singaporeans should think about, do we have a right to voice out against decisions of the government that we do not agree with? The community of Cockburn had it and did it. Whether or not their proposal would be accepted later was inconsequential to me (but obviously not to them) because I felt the whole thing was a new experience, a new sensation to me altogether. It made me feel the place was actually alive, not the boring Perth that Singaporeans love to assume. It made me feel that people here are living things who care about the people, community groups, nature and identity around them unlike the absolute apathy that I used to experience in “vibrant Singapore.”
I wrote this not to condone protests or encourage people to become dissidents but to highlight the importance of having passionate close knitted communities in Singapore. In an environment where the government tells the people regularly to “take care of ourselves”, my point couldn’t be emphasize enough. Unfortunately, our community spirit is fast dwindling. Think about it, if we cannot even be attached to our surroundings or take pride in our community identity, how will the future generation be take pride in their country?
If you want proof that the people don’t give a damn what happens to their constituencies, just look for anyone who gave a damn when the GRCs of Cheng San or Eunos were broken up to combine with the other GRCs or wards. Most of us didn’t even understand the impact of these arrangements. Will the residents of Potong Pasir voice their unhappiness (if any) when they become part of a GRC in the next elections? To us, a constituency border is just a boundary line on the map, only applicable during the General Elections. Besides, what can we do about it? Protest like the Cockburn residents? I am not sure at all Singaporeans would bother to do so even if protesting is made legal in Singapore. It isn’t about protesting, it is about whether we even care or not. We don’t and probably never will.
Perhaps the system was designed with the purpose of segregating the people so that power can be eternally maintained since the divided can be easily conquered., combined with the constant emphasis on materialism, so that the people would focus solely on material pursuits and be useful economic numbers in their entire life span. What an amazing model. Such brilliance. But life is so cruel for the people who woke.
This article was first published in http://asingaporeanson.blogspot.sg

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

许文远称我国地铁南北线可靠度媲美港台

基础建设统筹部长兼交通部长许文远曾表示,我国地铁南北线随着核心系统的更新工程接近完工,可靠度也随着增加,甚至可媲美香港、台湾,但是并非所有网民都认同他的此番言论。 许文远是于7月5日,即上周五走访克兰芝地铁站的电力站时,发出以上言论,并指出东西线和南北线的列车在2014年及以前,几乎在平均行驶10万公里内就会发生一起,延误超过五分钟的事故。 他随后披露,目前两条线路中的三个核心系统更新工程已完成,其他的电力供应系统更新工程已竣工四分之一,列车和轨道电路工程进展说好顺利,预计在20230年,所有六个核心系统的更新工程能够竣工。 南北线更新工程较东北线提早展开,因此大大提升了可靠度,目前的表现已突破政府定下的2020年“百万”目标,平均行驶超过143万5000公里才发生一起延误超过五分钟的事故,可靠程度可以和顶尖的台北捷运、香港地铁相比。 东北线的可靠度也随着更新工程的进行而获得提升,列车记录显示,截至今年6月,列车行驶69万3000公里才发生一起延误超过五分钟的事故,比去年的40万8000公里来得高。 其他地铁线已接近“百万”目标 “政府设下的‘百万’目标是‘苛刻的’,全球地铁系统中,只有一部分能够达到这个目标,而我国的南北线、滨海市区线和东北线的地铁表现已经达标,其他的地铁线也已经接近目标。” 他表示,要让地铁系统完全不发生故障并非易事,成本也相对来的非常高。 他指出,若要每15年更换一次地铁列车,虽然能够降低故障的概率,但是乘客需要支付的费用将会很高。“这些都是我们得为乘客做出的取舍。” 他也吁请乘客们基于耐心和谅解更新工程所带来的不变,当局将确保地铁表现更加可靠,并保障对乘客的服务和地铁职员们的安全。 媲美港台就得意忘形? 我国地铁的发达和便利是很多网友都认同的,因此许文远的此番言论获得了不少网友的认同。…

穆仁理坚称组屋区已有现成“人行道” 惟网民反映怕“天降横祸”

民主党秘书长徐顺全,发文反映武吉巴督其中一座组屋,缺乏合适的人行道;该区议员穆仁理坚称,组屋区已有可供居民使用的现成步道,包括在组屋底层的空间。 惟一些网民也表达他们的担忧,不是他们不愿使用这些“步道”,实在是过往曾发生高空抛物案件,居民担忧“天降横祸”,才宁可远离组屋楼下。要鼓励居民使用现有步道,还需要遏止高空抛物的恶行。 徐顺全是在本月6日,在脸书上发文指出,武吉巴督第190座组屋缺乏人行道,许多居民走在路旁,车辆往来十分危险。 他也在脸书上晒出照片,照片中可见,妇女手牵着一名孩子,只能冒着危险在大马路上行走,而且车子与行人的距离非常小,很可能会发生意外。 “车子与行人的距离相当近,而且还有许多行人牵着小孩,冒着危险越过马路,因为这是他们唯一经过的道路。” 他也目睹了行人只能在车子经过时,将孩子拉向身边,而车子也尽量往外挪动,避免撞倒孩子。 基于行人的安全,徐顺全也向一些居民询问,不少居民对这种现象见怪不怪,因此也希望能够希望有安全的人行道。 甚至有居民向武吉巴督人民行动党议员穆仁理申述,但却被告知若一旦开始建人行道,可能又会进一步要求,增建雨盖步道等。 徐顺全敦促穆仁理和裕廊-金文泰市镇会市镇会,应该在意外未发生前着手处理,保障居民安全。 帖文发出后,引发网友的讨论,目前已获得2千900赞和295转载。对此,议员穆仁里也做出回应。 他表示,针对武吉巴督组屋内没有设置人行道一事在网络疯传,居民看似被迫在大马路上或草地上行走,也因此收到不少网友的提醒。 穆仁里也张贴一张当地居民的邮件回应此事。信件内容指出,居民林先生已在当地居住逾30年,而且一直都有遮屏的无障碍通道。与此同时,他也晒出武吉巴督组屋的无障碍通道。…

卫生部下禁中介令 新保官网“国际医疗”栏目“消失”

卫生部在昨日下令,禁止公立医院透过中介招揽外国病患生意,新保集团官网一个标注“国际医疗服务”的资讯内容也悄然消失。 卫生部在昨日文告指出,公立医院理应优先照顾国人医疗需求,不该市场化吸引外国病患牟利。三家公立医院:国立大学医院、中央医院和樟宜综合医院都被点名。 据报导,中介介绍国外病患到这些医院就医,至少能抽佣8巴仙,有者一次佣金所得,甚至比普通护士年薪来得高。 相信是受到卫生部压力,新保集团立即采取措施,其中“海外引荐和咨询”栏目无法登入,仅能透过网络缓存阅读,有关向海外病患解说如何申请前来就医的事项。 其中,网页也显示该网页内容最后活跃时间,乃是9月29日下午5时许。 该网页提及新保国际医疗服务(IMS)团队“提供外国病患和 家属多元化的服务,确保他们享有舒适的治疗体验。” 提供外国病患VIP服务 提供给国外病患的VIP服务包括: 预约和转诊 入院服务- 接待病患并陪同他们完成入院手续…

Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan warns other countries to not take Singapore for granted

Singapore’s Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan warns countries dealing with the Republic to…