In Court Today – Little India Riot case:

M Ravi, representing Mr Arun Kaliamurthy – who is being charged for involvement in the Little India riot – informed the court today that he shall be filing an application for judicial review with regards to the question of unequal treatment and the nature of the conditions imposed on his client.

The matter involves the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) requiring Mr Arun to renew his S-Pass everyday at the ICA.

Mr Ravi had asked the court to order that this be changed to a weekly renewal, rather than a daily one. The court today said it had no jurisdiction over the matter, agreeing with the deputy public prosecutor, that the decision is an executive one, not a judicial one.

However, Mr Ravi argued that “such an executive decision violates Article 12 of the Singapore Constitution as this requirement was not similarly imposed on others in the same position as our client.”

Mr. Ravi reserved his client’s position that the Subordinate courts does indeed have jurisdiction to adjudicate on constitutional matters.

TOC understands that similar conditions are not imposed on the others who have been offered bail.

Mr Arun issued a statement himself today, saying:

“With regards to the requirement to report to the ICA every day, I feel that it is extremely oppressive and unreasonable.

“It is also discriminatory since such a requirement is not imposed on others in a similar situation. My counsel has said that such a requirement goes against Article 12 of the constitution which prohibits such discrimination and constitutes a violation of my right to equal treatment.

“I am extremely disappointed with the treatment I have received from a country which prides itself on high standards of justice and equality.”

Mr Arun’s next hearing will be on 29 January.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Execution of Singaporean Tamil condemned by UN Experts: Call for moratorium on death penalty

United Nations experts strongly condemn Singapore’s recent execution of Tangaraju s/o Suppiah, calling for an immediate moratorium on capital punishment. They express concerns over inadequate interpretation during police interrogations in his conviction and the high rate of execution notices for drug-related offenses. The experts criticize Singapore’s mandatory sentencing law, discriminatory treatment of minorities, and the suspension of the death penalty moratorium. They urge Singapore to review the death penalty’s scope, limit it to cases involving intentional killing, and abolish it to protect the right to life. Tangaraju represented himself in court as no lawyers in Singapore were willing to take up his case. Human rights lawyer Mr Ravi highlighted the fear of cost orders and disciplinary actions faced by lawyers who take up such cases.

President Halimah Yacob says it is important for her to be periodically briefed by GIC and Temasek on their investment outlook as “both GIC and Temasek invest our reserves”

In a Facebook post on Thursday (24 September), President Halimah Yacob revealed…

MOH confirms 16 pregnant women to be infected with Zika virus

The Ministry of Health (MOH) has announced that there are 16 pregnant…

A $60 Billion National Regeneration Plan

The following is the second in a three-part summary extract from the…