By Terry Xu

MARUAH had to change the venue for its public forum “Foreign Workers, Justice and Fairness” that was held yesterday on Dec 23rd, at extremely short notice.

The venue was originally set to be at the hall on the second floor of Ananda Bhavan Restaurant at Syed Alwi Road (opposite Mustafa Centre). The NGO had already paid for the venue and the publicity posters were released on Thursday with the venue stated in the poster.

On MURUAH’s facebook status, they said that they received a call from the restaurant’s management on the evening of 21st of December to inform them that the police had called them to ask about the event, and spoken to them about the foreign workers in their employment.

The NGO then contacted the police to inform that the event was legal and ask that the police to contact them to seek any clarifications needed, as they did not want the restaurant to be caught in between. The NGO also informed the management of the restaurant of the event’s programme so as to assure them that everything was proper.

However, the restaurant then sent a SMS stating that ‘after consulting the police and advice from the Board’, the restaurant decided to cancel the booking and would refund the money paid.

MARUAH issued this statement over the incident:

[spacer style=”1″ icon=”none”]

“MARUAH registers our protest over this blatant harassment by the government against lawful and legitimate civil society activities. Through this forum, we are seeking to build bridges in the community, to ask for equal access to justice for all and to deepen our understanding of the issues faced by foreign workers. This discussion is necessary and important to our society.

So we are disappointed at these tactics employed by the police. We sympathise with the management of Ananda Bhavan Restaurant. They have clearly been unsettled by the call from the police.

But there was no need for the police to contact the restaurant and subject them to unwarranted fear and anxiety. MARUAH is open, above-board, and easily contactable. The police could and should have contacted us, as organisers of the event, to ask any questions and seek any clarifications they might have. To date, we have still not heard from the police.

We appreciate the concerns that the police may have, and would have done our part to address any concerns that they may have had, if they had only contacted us. But civil society has a right, even a moral duty, to organise such events, and the government has to respect and protect this right, not take steps to undermine our legitimate exercise of our lawful rights.

MARUAH regrets that we have no choice but to say that the approach adopted through the police was unnecessarily restrictive and oppressive, and has only served to reduce the common space for Singaporeans to speak up and play an active role in society.”

[spacer style=”1″ icon=”none”]

TODAY reported on this incident saying,

“The police have explained that their concern about “a potential law and order issue” was what prompted them to “seek more information” from a restaurant in Little India at Syed Alwi Road that was to have been the venue for a public forum on issues relating to the Dec 8 riot.

The Ananda Bhavan Restaurant owner’s cancellation of the booking was of his own volition, while he also claimed that the forum’s organisers had “misrepresented the nature of the event”, a police spokesman added.”

While Straits Times reported on its online version of the newspaper saying,

“Human rights group Maruah had misrepresented the nature of a foreign worker rights forum to the owner of a venue they intended to use for the event, the police said on Monday.

In a media statement, the police said they were informed of this by the owner of the Ananda Bhavan restaurant in Little India.

The owner then cancelled the booking for the event “of his own volition”, the authorities added.”

Though it is understandable that the police are doing what they are supposed to do to ensure the security of the country, especially at this moment of heightened tension due to the recent incident at Little India. But it is still bewildering that the police choose to contact the management of the restaurant to clarify on their concerns over the issues of law and order instead of the event organisers themselves.

To simply push the decision of cancelling the booking of the event as being the sole discretion of the restaurant owner is irresponsible and say that the restaurant owner have claimed that the forum’s organisers had misrepresented the nature of the event is outrageous.

Straits Times report that Ananda Bhavan chief executive Viren Ettikan’s decision was reached after the police visited them and mentioned the need for stability in the neighbourhood after the Dec 9 riot.

“He thought the event was “for some charitable cause, or a discussion.” “Now the police are trying their best to ensure things are stable, we should as a business, ensure that everything is smooth, not add to any such things,” he said on Monday.” – Straits Times

How is it possible to misrepresent the nature of an event where a group of people sitting together listening to people speaking? Under what category would the event organisers have told the restaurant this forum to be, that would have been misrepresented the actual event to the management for the money collected in the first place? What misrepresentation would spur the restaurant to cancel the event last minute? Or they think that this might be something that be illegal since the police called to ask about the event?

What the restaurant owner might not have expected is not the nature of the event but likely the intervention of the police.

The article was updated with information from ST. 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

中国男子解除隔离十日后发病 妻孩三人皆无症状感染

中国山东一名男子在解除隔离后10天发病,妻孩三人皆无症状感染。 据中国央视报道,该名患者来自山东日照42岁刘先生,是日照市第10例的女婿,曾与确诊病例接触,而随后其妻子、女儿和儿子均被隔离。 四人在隔离观察期间均无显示异常,因此于期满后全部解除隔离,但在期满解除隔离10日后,刘先生因咳嗽、发热到医院就诊,随即隔离治疗,于2月15日检测确诊感染新冠病毒。 妻子、女儿与儿子也接受检测,均呈阳性,为无症状感染。目前当地有关部门已对四人进行流行病学调查,并逐一落实集中隔离医学观察。 《新浪网》报道,不少网友因此提出疑问,该名患者是因为隔离结束还有接触任何其他病例还是因为潜伏期较长。但针对上述问题,北青报记者从日照卫健委了解到,刘先生确诊后曾自述称,结束隔离后其和家人也没有出过门,没有再接触其他确诊或疑似患者。 日照卫健委工作人员表示:“但具体的行动轨迹也不能完全采信患者自述,我们正在针对这个病例进行外围调查,范围比较大,应该很快会有结果。”

总统府附近置玩具手榴弹 清洁工玩大了!被罚四千五

玩大了!在总统府附近放置玩具手榴弹以测试路人反应,清洁工人被罚款4500元。 据《亚洲新闻台》报导,59岁的Elankovan Marimuthu于2017年11月3日早上7时许,在打扫总统府公园附近时,在槟榔巷(Penang Lane)一消防栓旁捡到一枚玩具手榴弹。 他随后决定查看公众的反应,于是用夹钳将手榴弹肃立起来,就离开了现场。 两名电单车骑士于当天下午2时05分经过槟榔巷和乌节路交界处时,发现该枚假手榴弹,其中一人报案。警方抵达现场后将该领域封锁起来。 占用大批公共资源 虽然此事只是虚惊一场,但是却占用了大批的公共资源。 新加坡警察部队各部门出动了39名警员,武装部队出动了八名生化武器、辐射性物质及爆炸物防御团成员,还有其他警员在多美歌地铁站等周边区域进行扫荡。 该区域关闭了半小时,且局部封锁交通45分钟,警方还向民众发布疏散信息。 警方于当天下午5时许,证实有关手榴弹只是一个玩具后,开放了封锁区域的交通路段,随后透过闭路电视记录确认始作俑者,将Elankovan逮捕归案。 高昂罚款起警示作用…

举印有笑脸纸张遭警传召问话 网友呼吁声援黄国光

为在阻断措施期间展示对本地小贩的支持,行动党义顺集选区议员黄国光在去年6月手拿一张写着“支持他们”(Support Them)和画有笑脸的A4纸张,与小贩合照。 然而,他的行为却被质疑可能抵触《公共秩序法》,属于无准证在共公共场所集会。警方也证实已传召黄国光问话协助调查。 一方有难,八方来援,只因为举着印有笑脸的纸张,就可能触法,一些网友也非议此事“荒唐”,也直言究竟黄国光拿着一张纸,如何“危害公共秩序”? “他只不过要表达在艰难时期对小贩的支持,看不出这有什么问题。” 也有网友Joshua Chiang表示:“与黄国光同在”,呼吁他人也一起透过小小举动,拿起支持黄国光的标语牌,声援后者。 对此事,黄国光也在个人脸书澄清,去年6月仍是阻断措施,自己到小贩中心走访,也举起标语牌与小贩合照。他也指更早前在去年1月,自己在一段短片中举起标语牌,为首个气候暖化动议作宣传,不过气候暖化的字样是在较后用特效加上去的。 [ Supporting our hawkers…