maruah

 

We write to express our dismay at the attempt to prosecute Mr Alex Au for contempt of court and the reports about the Media Development Authority (MDA) seeking to regulate online media platforms the Breakfast Network and The Independent Singapore.

The members of MARUAH, as Singapore citizens and human rights activists, are concerned that these actions will further shrink the space for public discourse in Singapore. Robust debate, diverse views, questioning and criticism, as well as a healthy media landscape, are all critical to the development of a functional democracy.

Criticism of key institutions like the judiciary is best addressed through a right of reply by way of well-reasoned rebuttals, not by this reliance on the archaic legal action of “scandalizing the judiciary”, which the UK Law Commission has described as “an infringement of freedom of expression and out of step with social attitudes” that “would do little to reinforce respect for the judiciary.” If the article in question by Mr Au was incorrect, then the better thing to do is to rebut him in public. Using criminal sanctions against him will not convince the public that he was wrong.

Meanwhile, a healthy media landscape calls for diverse, independent voices that also need to have the space to be commercially viable. The MDA is reportedly requiring the Breakfast Network and The Independent Singapore to provide details on their shareholders and subscribers. These are overly-intrusive requirements, going far beyond what would be necessary to satisfy the stated objective of preventing foreign influence over the media, and will only serve to choke these outlets, even if they choose to comply.

The right to freedom of expression is enshrined in our Constitution, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and even in the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration signed by the Government. Yet, the Government’s recent actions are highly regressive, and serve to limit the space for expression instead of expanding it. In 2004, then-Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in a landmark speech to the Harvard Club: “I have no doubt that our society must open up further… Looking ahead, one important task of the government will be to promote further civic participation, and continue to progressively widen the limits of openness… We will promote a political culture which responds to people’s desire for greater participation, in a manner which supports Singapore’s growth as a nation.”

We urge the Government to remain true to its promises and so seek the reversal of these actions against Mr Au, the Breakfast Network and The Independent Singapore.

Ms Braema Mathi
President
MARUAH Singapore

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

ICA detected 1,750 cartons of contraband cigarettes smuggled in a cargo of assorted vegetables

The Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (ICA) officers found 1,750 cartons of duty-unpaid…

129人涉高利贷活动遭逮捕

一直以来警方致力于打击高利贷活动,近日就有94名男子与35名女子,年龄介于17-82岁涉嫌高利贷活动,于本月8-10日在警方的打击行动中被逮捕。 日前,刑事侦查局(CID)的警员与7名不同分区警察(Police Land Division)在不同区域展开同步缉捕行动,该缉捕行动为期三天。 警方表示,在初步的调查中,已锁定28名嫌犯涉嫌高利贷的跑腿人,负责执行ATM转账业务;另四名嫌犯涉嫌以泼漆和涂鸦在墙上,威胁骚扰受害者。 另外,两名嫌犯涉嫌无牌贷款,以及一名嫌犯涉嫌为提供假信息以取得贷款。剩余的94名嫌犯则涉嫌将银行户口、提款卡与密码给高利贷者作为无牌贷款的用途。 警方指出,目前案件正在进一步调查中。 警方强调涉嫌协助高利贷者开设银行账户、分发小册子、作高利贷者的跑腿人或骚扰行为,均为严重犯罪行为,将依法处置罚款、监禁或鞭笞。针对高利贷活动,警方将严正以待,无论嫌犯在高利贷活动中扮演何种角色,一律面临法律制裁。 根据《放贷人法》(2010年修订),任何人的银行户口或提款卡被发现用以经营无牌贷款,将推定该名用户涉嫌参与高利贷活动。 涉嫌高利贷活动的初犯者,或将面临3万至30万新元的罚款、或监禁最高4年以及6鞭鞭刑 涉嫌经营无牌贷款者或骚扰威胁行为,或将面临5000至5万新元、或监禁最高5年以及3-6鞭鞭刑。 警方表示所有透过信息或网路平台宣传贷款消息都很可能是无牌贷款,因为他们并不如持牌贷款公司能够透过广告宣传贷款服务。…

他国被迫“锁国” 陈川仁:一开始未能管控病毒传播

在今日(25日)召开国会前夕,国会议长陈川仁今早在脸书发文,指其他国家被迫转向“封境”措施,是因为未能一开始管控住传播,导致后来病例数增长、医疗体系不堪重负。 “这正是在中国、伊朗、意大利发生的事,接下来会是… …?”他也指当前这些国家只能采取封锁减缓病毒传播,但他担忧可能已错过防堵窗口。陈川仁也指我国还在可控范围,还不到上述国家的地步,因为一开始就已采取措施,例如香港、台湾和韩国也展示他们如何应对疫情。 新加坡在昨日新增49起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,本地累计确诊558例。与此同时我国也宣布落实更严厉措施,包括乐龄活动停办、娱乐场所停止运营等。 有不少民众质问,为何当初就采取严谨措施?为何政策一改再改?有者甚至质问是否这些措施太严苛? 对此陈川仁认为,打从疫情出现,我国就致力把感染率维持在最低,以便能更好地照顾病患,透过一些列措施来追踪和隔离,致使目前得以把病例数量维持在可控范围,医疗系统不至于超过负荷,医护人员能照顾严重病患。 依据需要进行管制 他认为我国政府是依据需要进行管制。当前较严厉管制措施影响日常生活和经济,但更多是关乎管理风险和减少感染率、协助病患康复。 “至今我们都做得相当不错,但随着有海外国人返国,如今迎来第二波疫情。但我们必须让他们回来,都是我们的国人,即时他们病了也要照顾。” 他指由于其他地区陷入混乱状态,预计未来数周或几个月内还有更多国人回来,也意味着也有病例增加的可能。他认为这就是为何政府宣布了新的举措。 不过,他又直言,其他国家喜剧性地被迫转向封镜措施,是因为已失去控制,“他们没能管控一开始的传播,已传播到社区且病例数指数型增长,随之医疗系统不胜负荷,也致使死亡率攀升。” “这正是在中国、伊朗、意大利发生的事,接下来是….?这些都会发生除非采取紧急的封锁措施(有些还三心两意?)才能减缓病毒传播。我担忧他们已错失窗口。”…

Clearing the Haze: Solutions at hand

“Clearing the Haze” is a feature series by The Online Citizen that…