Connect with us

Uncategorized

Payslips – weak reasons from Acting Manpower Minister

Published

on

slips

By Andrew Loh

The Government’s decision to not require businesses to issue payslips to their employees is “prompted by strong objections from small businesses”, the Straits Times reported on 13 November.

Acting Manpower Minister, Tan Chuan Jin, had given this explanation in Parliament on Tuesday.

Apparently, the main reason for the “strong objections” was that such a requirement would add to the administrative costs of these businesses, particularly the small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

These were concerns which “the ministry understands”, Mr Tan said.

Nonetheless, he said requiring businesses to issue payslips was “a direction we want to go.”

“Not everything ought to be legislated at once as ultimately, we aim to change behaviour in a sustainable way,” he added.

Despite labour MP Zainal Sapari’s call for a timeframe to make it compulsory to issue payslips, Mr Tan declined to offer one. Without such legislation, Mr Sapari said, irresponsible employers can “cover their tracks” when they underpay or flout the law.

Mr Sapari also raised other employment concerns, to which Mr Tan replied that imposing too many conditions may affect the employability of workers.

“Then we end up hurting the very people that we are trying to protect,” he said.

It is hard to understand Minister Tan’s explanation.

For a start, why would issuing payslips to employees hurt employees?

Second, how much more “administrative costs” would be incurred by businesses, given that businesses issue receipts, invoices and such all the time as a matter of routine.

It is not surprising then that Mr Tan’s seemingly simplistic explanation has drawn criticism.

“If issuing a pay slip is costly, then your business deserves to close down,” Mr Jolovan Wham posted on his Facebook page. “This is clear evidence of how the Singapore government is ridiculously pro-business.”

Mr Wham, the former executive director of HOME, a migrant workers NGO, has been involved in providing aid to low-wage foreign workers and he has raised the issue of payslips several times over the years.

It is disturbing that the minister seemed to be implying that fear of increased business costs is sufficient grounds for the government not to legislate protection for workers, or not to inconvenience employers.

As one online commentator posted: “Funny how this logic is absent when it comes to increases in the foreign worker levy, from which the state earns over $2 billion a year.”

More importantly, issuing payslips protects both employees and employers from fraudulent claim later on, and can help in settling pay disputes.

On 12 November, the Straits Times reported that the “Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has over the past year helped more than 22,000 Singaporeans who were denied basic employment rights by errant employers.”

These included “bosses who failed to pay salaries on time, make Central Provident Fund (CPF) contributions or offer overtime allowances.”

Mr Tan said his ministry “has taken action against” these errant employers – although “none has been prosecuted so far.”

The fact that the MOM has had to step in to help “22,000” Singaporean workers with salary or CPF matters because of errant employers perhaps tells us that the problem is not a limited one.

Mr Tan did not say if the problem is also as significant among the foreign workers segment of our workforce.

Would not a legislated requirement to issue payslips help resolve some of these problems earlier, and also act as a deterrent to errant employers – when they know that there would be black-and-white proof of non-payment of salaries?

Unfortunately, Mr Tan’s weak excuse in defence of employers and businesses adds to the problem – the very problems which MP Sapari had raised.

It allows unscrupulous employers to get away with abusing their employees.

Also, what if there are again “strong objections” from businesses to any future legislations which may add to the costs of businesses? Will the minister once again capitulate and withdraw, even though such legislations will protect Singaporean workers?

Perhaps Mr Tan should provide a more thorough explanation rather than offer vague statements and weak excuses which do not shed much light on the matter – or worse, which are nonsensical.

A commentator on The Online Citizen’s Facebook page said: “This is disappointing, no matter how insignificant it may be. You can put in place estate duties, impose maid levies, raise transportation fees and increase ERP in snaps of fingers, but you cannot put in place payslip.”

“A payslip is every worker’s right not a privilege,” said another poster.

It is basic. If businesses are unable to provide this to their employees, the Acting Minister for Manpower should not be making excuses for them – he should, instead, be questioning if they should be in business in the first place.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Indonesia

Miss Universe cuts ties with Indonesia chapter after harassment allegations

The Miss Universe Organization severs ties with Indonesia franchise due to harassment claims. Malaysia edition canceled.

Women allege body checks before pageant. Investigation launched. Safety prioritized.

Indonesia winner to compete in November finale. Height requirement controversy.

Published

on

WASHINGTON, UNITED STATES — The Miss Universe Organization has cut ties with its Indonesia franchise, it announced days after allegations of sexual harassment, and will cancel an upcoming Malaysia edition.

In the complaint, more than a half dozen women said all 30 finalists for Miss Universe Indonesia were unexpectedly asked to strip for a supposed body check for scars and cellulite two days before the pageant’s crowning ceremony in Jakarta.

Their lawyer said Tuesday that five of the women had their pictures taken.

“In light of what we have learned took place at Miss Universe Indonesia, it has become clear that this franchise has not lived up to our brand standards, ethics, or expectations,” the US-based Miss Universe Organization posted Saturday night on social media site X, formerly known as Twitter.

It said that it had “decided to terminate the relationship with its current franchise in Indonesia, PT Capella Swastika Karya, and its National Director, Poppy Capella.”

It thanked the contestants for their bravery in coming forward and added that “providing a safe place for women” was the organization’s priority.

Jakarta police spokesman Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said Tuesday that an investigation into the women’s complaint has been launched.

The Indonesia franchise also holds the license for Miss Universe Malaysia, where there will no longer be a competition this year, according to the New York-based parent organizer.

In a lengthy statement posted to Instagram, Indonesia franchise director Capella denied involvement in any body checks.

“I, as the National Director and as the owner of the Miss Universe Indonesia license, was not involved at all and have never known, ordered, requested or allowed anyone who played a role and participated in the process of organizing Miss Universe Indonesia 2023 to commit violence or sexual harassment through body checking,” she wrote.

She added that she is against “any form of violence or sexual harassment.”

The Jakarta competition was held from 29 July to 3 August to choose Indonesia’s representative to the 2023 Miss Universe contest, and was won by Fabienne Nicole Groeneveld.

Miss Universe said it would make arrangements for her to compete in the finale, scheduled for November in El Salvador.

This year’s Indonesia pageant also came under fire for announcing a “significant change in this (year’s) competition guidelines” with the elimination of its minimum height requirement after it had crowned a winner.

In its statement, the Miss Universe Organization said it wanted to “make it extremely clear that there are no measurements such as height, weight, or body dimensions required to join a Miss Universe pageant worldwide.”

— AFP

Continue Reading

Malaysia

A Perodua service centre in Kuantan, Malaysia went viral for its strict dress code, Perodua responds

A dress code for vehicle servicing? A Malaysian car brand’s service centre dress code signage has puzzled netizens, raising queries about the need for attire rules during a routine service.

The manufacturer responded with an official statement after a flurry of comments, seeking to clarify and apologize.

Published

on

By

MALAYSIA: A dress code signage positioned at a service centre belonging to a prominent Malaysian car brand has sparked bewilderment among Malaysian netizens, who question the necessity of adhering to attire guidelines for a simple vehicle servicing.

The signage explicitly delineates clothing items that are deemed unsuitable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, abbreviated pants, and distressed jeans.

The car manufacturer swiftly found itself flooded with comments from both inquisitive and irked Malaysian netizens. This surge in online activity prompted the company to issue an official statement aimed at clarifying the situation and extending an apology.

In a post that gained significant traction on the social media platform, politician Quek Tai Seong of Pahang State, Malaysia, shared an image to Facebook on Monday (7 Aug).

The image showcased a dress code sign prominently displayed at a Perodua Service Centre in Kuantan. Within the post, Quek posed the question: “Is this dress code applicable nationwide, or is it specific to this branch?”

The signage reads, “All customers dealing with Perodua Service Kuantan 1, Semambu, are requested to dress modestly and appropriately.”

Adding visual clarity to these guidelines, the sign features illustrative graphics that explicitly outline clothing items deemed unacceptable, including sleeveless tops, short skirts, short pants, and ripped jeans.

Delineating the specifics of the dress code, the signage stipulates that male visitors are expected to don shirts accompanied by neckties, opt for long pants, and wear closed shoes.

Conversely, female visitors are advised to don long-sleeved shirts, full-length skirts, and closed-toe footwear.

Perodua’s dress code sparks online uproar

Following the rapid spread of the post, Perodua’s official Facebook page found itself inundated with comments from both intrigued and frustrated Malaysian netizens, all seeking clarifications about the newly surfaced dress code policy.

Amidst the flurry of comments, numerous incensed netizens posed pointed questions such as, “What is the rationale behind the introduction of such regulations by the management? We demand an explanation.”

Another netizen expressed their dissatisfaction, arguing against the necessity of the rule and urging Perodua to take inspiration from the practices of other 4S (Sales, Service, Spare Parts, and Survey) automotive dealerships.

A concerned Facebook user chimed in, advocating for a more lenient stance, asserting that attempting to dictate customers’ clothing choices might not be in the company’s best interest.

Someone also commented in an angry tone, “Oi what is this? Going there for car service, not interview or working, right.”

As the discourse unfolded, it became evident that while some inquiries carried genuine weight, others chose to inject humor into the situation, playfully remarking, “If I wanted to buy a Myvi, I should buy or rent a formal attire first.”

“I sell economy rice at a hawker centre, I have never worn a long sleeve shirt and a tie… I guess I will not buy a Perodua car then.”

“I guess they will not serve those who wear short pants.”

Perodua addresses dress code controversy

As reported by Chinese media outlet Sin Chew Daily News, the manager of Kuantan’s Perodua Service Centre had acknowledged that the images on the dress code signage were misleading.

In response, the manager divulged that discussions had transpired with the head office, leading to the prompt removal of the signage to prevent any further misconceptions.

The manager clarifies, “We do encourage visitors to adhere to the dress etiquette, but we won’t go to the extent of restricting their choice of attire.”

He also revealed that currently, no complaints have been directly received from the public.

However, feedback from certain customers was relayed through Perodua’s agents.

Perodua also released an official statement by chief operating officer JK Rozman Jaffar on Wednesday (9 Aug) regarding the dress code on their official Facebook page.

The statement stated the dress code etiquette is not aligned with their official guidelines and they are currently conducting an official investigation on the matter followed by corrective measures to avoid the same incident from happening.

Perodua also extends its apologies for any inconvenience caused.

 

Continue Reading

Trending