Book launch event: The 1963 Operation Cold Store in Singapore: Commemorating 50 Years, edited by Poh Soo Kai, Tan Kok Fang and Hong Lysa

By Hong Lysa

When British film director and education policy-maker David Puttnam visited Singapore last October, he was featured in a full-page interview, where his message was that university teachers should ask their students questions, and challenge them to ask questions constantly. (Straits Times 12 Oct 2013).

No one who is in a leadership position in Singapore today would argue with this. The Singapore education system from pre-school to university has adopted student-centred learning, emphasising inquiry, figuring out how to put this into operation through a systematic approach to identifying and gathering information, analysis, and presentation of one’s conclusions.

Yet there is an elephant in the room. One of the most crucial areas of inquiry which will encourage the development of a better thinking and a thoughtful Singaporean with an appreciation of our country and how it came to be, has been and continues to be marked as illicit.

This area is no less post-war Singapore history in general, in particular the years 1959 to 1965, and specifically Operation Coldstore — the arrest and detention without trial of more than a hundred people on 2 February 1963, comprising leaders of the opposition party Barisan Sosialis, labour unions with a mass following, and Nanyang University alumni and students. Operation Pechah was mounted less than 3 weeks following the general election of 21 September 1963. Orders of arrest were issued against 5 of the 13 newly elected Barisan MPs among others.

Operation Coldstore and other instances where the Internal Security Act was used have been justified by the authorities as measures to save the country from succumbing to communist subversion. On the other hand, survivors of political detention contend that Operation Coldstore and Pechah were intended to kill off the left-wing opposition, which threatened the electoral fortunes of the PAP.

The Operations marked the first step towards one-party rule in Singapore. Dissent was suppressed, and even political prisoners who were released unconditionally after almost 20 years like Dr Lim Hock Siew were warned that they would be rearrested immediately if they caused trouble. For close to half a century, former political detainees did not keep a public profile at all. A veil of silence descended on Operation Coldstore.

This silence has been broken in the last five years or so, among other things with publications that cannot simply be dismissed as baseless propaganda.

How are history teachers to encourage critical inquiry and thinking when teaching Singapore history? With the state continuously coming up with its statements about ‘communist united fronts’ and the chilling warning: ‘ex-detainees will not be permitted to re-write history’ when it is compelled to react, such testimonies, accounts and analyses that the survivors of political detention produce immediately become illicit material.

The 1963 Operation Coldstore in Singapore: Commemorating 50 Years one hopes is a publication that does deserve at least some degree of serious consideration. Those who turn up for the book launch should expect to be treated with respect, and be presented with arguments for them to think about. Not harangues and proselytising. Not sales talk or entertainment. If they are successful, the reaction of the audience should be a sober one.

The book launch is an open event. The audience will be able to interrogate the speakers, read the book and throw it away if they find the arguments facile or unconvincing. Most copies are likely to end up sitting unread on the bookshelves—the fate of even purportedly bestselling political memoirs in Singapore. There is nothing sensational or thrilling or daring about the launch. Any such expectation generated is only on account of how such events and publications have already been branded by the state.

It will indeed make the lives of history teachers much easier if what appears to be forbidden fruit become regular debates about our history.

Assoc Prof Kwok Kian Woon, associate provost in charge of student life at the NTU, was quoted in response to David Puttnam’s views on education. Prof Kwok said: Most importantly, students should come to realise that making a good, robust argument involves on the one hand, discipline and rigour in thinking and on the other, respect and a generous spirit. One yields to the force of better argument.

The move towards such civility needs to begin at home.

Hong Lysa is a historian. She is one of the editors of The 1963 Operation Coldstore in Singapore: Commemorating 50 Years.


Operation Coldstore remains the most contentious event in the history of post-colonial Singapore. On 2 February 1963 and the weeks that followed, 133 men and women were arrested and detained. The country was deprived of the top leaders of the opposition parties, trade unions, rural organisations, and Nanyang University student and alumni associations. The collapse of political pluralism and the open exploration among the people of Singapore for the kind of society they envisaged ensued. In all but one of the five decades since, the Internal Security Act which permits detention without trial has been and continues to be used.

Despite attempts by the state to silence survivors of Operation Coldstore, the authors in this volume have now placed on record their perspective and understanding of the event as left-wing political actors who responded to the call of anti-colonialism and the challenge of shaping a new society.

In remembering Operation Coldstore, we affirm the personal price that the most resolute leaders of that generation have paid, in order that Singaporeans will be able to better understand the nature of State power that runs through their society.

Venue: Harvest Care Centre, 165 Sims Avenue #04-01, S (387606) (Between Lorong 17 and Lorong 21 Geylang)
Nearest MRT: Aljunied (about ten minutes’ walk)
Bus numbers: 2, 13, 21, 26, 51, 62, 63, 67, 80, 100, 125, 158, 158B, 853*
Date: 16 November 2013
Time: 2.30 pm (Please be seated by 2.15 pm)

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

An ageing population? – Part 4

~by: Gordon Lee~ Welcome to the last part of this article. In…

【冠状病毒19】8月30日新增54确诊 八社区病例、七入境病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月30日中午12时,本地新增54例冠病19确诊。 其中八例时社区病例、七例为入境病例。本地累计确诊已增至5万6771例。 社区病例中,七人为本地公民或永久居民,一名为工作准证持有者。 七例入境病例在抵境后已遵守居家通知。当局将在晚些时候公布更多细节。

【选举】李显扬:新加坡需要改变

前进党成员、建国总理李光耀次子李显扬: 这次大选,当我与政府组屋屋主、熟食中心和社区一带的群众交谈时,我每一天都听到他们对我诉说的担心和焦虑。 独立世代已年老,您的政府组屋租约正在减少,您担心,是否能够拿到本身的退休基金。您担心,您无法负担本身退休后的医疗费。您担心,您的孙子们活在阶级意识强烈的新加坡所面对的沉重压力,许多人在学生时代已经被限制、被归类了。 独立世代的孩子一直与海外人才竞争,争夺高薪的工作和升迁机会。尽管您有服兵役,您觉得自己在自己的国家仍活得像二等公民。生活在全球生活成本最昂贵之一的城市中,为了应付不断上涨的生活成本,您终日营营役役为生活奔波。对于您关心的课题,您却不被鼓励发表言论。新加坡,是您的家园。但是,您却觉得自己不受欢迎,新加坡已变成令人感到步步惊心的迷宫。您的未来,不再安全、不再有保障,甚至无法成功。 在人民行动党(PAP)控制的现况中,我们的未来隐藏种种危机。近年来,PAP政府紧钳媒体,并对社交媒体的言论实施严格的控制。政府隐瞒了许多的资料,无论是国家储备金、就业数字、人口目标数字或其它计划,任何人都难以获取足够的数据。 当机制中出现那么多的血缘、婚姻或密切的关系,要进行适当的监督与制衡,并非易事。在贪污或朋党或滥权,或我们的储蓄还未被滥用之前,我们如何能够预先发现问题? 您如何能够获得更透明的答案,并能够获得资讯和数据?毕竟,要作出明智知情的决策,资讯极其关键。新加坡公民不应被视为小孩子或像小孩般受人控制。 您如何能够让我们的领袖变得有担当?您如何能够让他们聆听您的心声?您如何能够让他们至少会慎重地考虑不同的意见,而不是置之不理,然后又回到过时的思考模式?PAP说要保障新加坡的安全,那为什么他们会那么匆忙在新冠肺炎疫情中举行大选,让新加坡人民去冒生命危险呢? 这些问题的答案是什么?那就是您在上个星期已听过许多遍的:“用你手中的选票,表达你的心声。” 对于新加坡而言,投票给反对党是最安全的选择。这不是要“打翻船或捣乱局势”,而是要拯救我们的船免于下沉。今天,我们活在迷宫中,全是因为一党独大,缺乏监督与制衡,缺乏透明度或问责机制。只有“自己检查自己”这个说法。 新加坡的未来岌岌可危。每一票都非常珍贵。终结PAP的绝大多数议席地位。给现有执政党敲醒警钟。别再向人民开空头支票。 勇敢地投票。…

Former AHPETC secretary Mr Danny Loh dies aged 55

Mr Danny Loh Chong Meng, 55, passed away during a holiday at…