Translated from Wanbao , “运尸车接获罚单 殡葬业者:没人情味

Video from Wanbao

4 summon tickets in a mere 15 minutes park at the roadside to ferry the body for funeral. Coffin delivery man complains: “Devoid of compassion to issue summon while the deceased and the coffin is still on the vehicle!”. This incident happened at around 1pm on 4th November at the roadside of Jalan Membina Block 22.

A funeral service provider who does not wish to be named complained that during the incident, four lorries were delivering the coffin, the deceased along with some funeral offerings to the funeral site.

As there is only a small road for parking beside the funeral site. Although the road is marked with a double yellow line but the provider still parked the lorries by the roadside out of convience to shift the coffin and the body of the deceased to site.

“We parked the lorries at the small road, got off the lorries to settle some affairs with the deceased’s family. Who would have expected to find 3 vehicles to be summoned within just 15 minutes, each vehicles being fined 100 dollars!”

He said that when the vehicles were being given the summon, the deceased along with the coffin were still on the vehicle, and cannot understand why the traffic warden could not have been more accommodating when they knew that the family is having a funeral, and still went ahead to issue the traffic summon.

He added that, the lorry that was ferrying the coffin had its rear door opened and could clearly see the coffin, the traffic warden surely would have know that they were having a funeral.

To make things worse, apart from 3 of the lorries from the funeral provider were being given the summons, the car of the deceased’s family was also given one summon.

“I know that by parking the vehicles on the double yellow line is a violation of the traffic rules but we can’t possibly drive the vehicles to the multi-storey carpark and then shift the deceased’s body and the coffin from upstairs.”

He feels that the traffic wardens should be more flexible when it comes to handing such incidents, and communicate with the family of the deceased and the funeral service providers.

Deceased’s family help in appeal

The family of the deceased took in the 3 parking summons to help in appealing. The funeral service provider who does not wish to be named revealed that the deceased’s family facing the sorrow of losing one’s daughter still went out of way to take over their 3 summon tickets and expressed their willingness in helping to appeal, this made him very touched.

He said that he has confidence that the appeal will go through but hope that when the traffic wardens face with such circumstances, they could show more compassion in handling of the situation.

Zheng Hai Chuan – Mostly accommodating

Funeral service provider: If traffic parking rules are violated, traffic warden would mostly accomodate.

Local well-known funeral service provider, Zheng Hai Chuan said during an interview that the providers would park the vehicles to park at the road nearest to the funeral site, which sometimes would evidently foul the law.

“Sometimes the bus which ferry the friends and relatives of the deceased would also park by the roadside but not for a long time”

He said that most traffic wardens would be compassionate. if the funeral service provider require to park their vehicles on a double-yellow lane, they would give allowance as these vehicles will only park a while before driving off.

He would also communicate with the traffic wardens and never met with funeral vehicles being issued summons before.

“Maybe the traffic warden do not know that this vehicle is related to funeral, and so issued the summons”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

牛车水中秋节嫦娥像惹争议 网民讥:后羿假扮

一年一度的中秋节即将来临,我国各地亦纷纷布置一番迎接佳节,但牛车水一带的布置竟惹争议。 位于裕华国货外的十字路口处达四五层楼高的中秋装饰,其中最惹人争议便是达两层楼高的“嫦娥人像”,让公众摸不着头脑。 该“嫦娥人像”身穿蓝绿衣,手挽粉红色水袖。尽管扎了发髻,脸上刻画着炯炯有神的双眼及细眉,还有挺拔的鼻梁及樱桃般的小嘴,但却显男子气概,看不出一点女性气质。这尊带有“中性气质”的嫦娥似乎也很不被接受,许多网友纷纷狠批更像是“人妖”。 照片曝光后,引起网友吐槽,嫦娥人像并没有女性气质,反而更像是后羿附体 还有部分网民吐槽人像更像是长得中性的女子,并调侃说是东方不败    部分网友则斥责当局的审美观,认为牛车水地区是旅游观光区,若以不达水平的工艺显现出来,只会让人笑掉大牙,等于是对大众的侮辱,甚至质疑当局及筹备委员是否偷工减料。

TOC Latest: DBS “disappointed” with Josie Lau’s disregard for staff Code of Conduct

“Such an attitude is not one that DBS, or any other organization, can condone in a leader.”

营中银行卡被盗 宵小刑满还同营服役

在军营里偷窃、到营外消费赃款,该被军法还是刑事法制裁,又或者两者都能定罪? 一名国民服役营员,日前分享自己在军营里遭宵小的经历,同时也对小偷最后只被军事法庭判处监禁15周,却不会在警方档案留下犯罪记录,感到十分疑惑。最令他懊恼的是,小偷在军事扣留营期满后,还会和他同营服役。 这名不愿具名的营员,且以伟俊代称,向“网络公民”阐述事件缘由。去年6月,伟俊从外头回到他服役的军营,发现放在储物柜里的银行卡不见了, 原本他不以为然,以为是忘在家里了。 然而,他在晚上8.57分,却收到银行短信,指其户口在电动车专卖店消费了2千余元,伟俊才警觉自己的银行卡被盗用了。他随即透过网络登入自己的户口,发现有3千元被转入他人银行户口,以及被盗用35元付德士费。 在他人劝告下,伟俊决定报警,不过警方基于案件在军营内发生,于是将此案转交军警处处理。经调查,伟进才得知是自己的一位营友,乘自己忘了锁上柜子,偷走了银行卡。 “相信他猜中了我的银行卡密码是我的生日,才能盗款得逞。国威向警方坦承。包括我的现金,共盗走5千多元。” 未指示小偷归还赃款 伟俊曾询问军警调查官可否拿回他被盗的款项,被告知需静候军事法庭裁决。然而,军事法庭并没指示小偷归还伟俊的钱,而且,用赃款买的电动车,也已归还给有关店主。 宵小只被罚拘留在扣留营15周,也不会在警方档案留下案底。 伟俊询问其律师意见,律师认为,该宵小已触犯刑事盗窃罪第379项224章,也有足够证据带上法庭,对新加坡警方为何没有采取行动,律师也感到不解。 伟俊认为,有关宵小盗窃罪证确凿,即触犯刑事罪,除了军法,理应也受刑事法的制裁,被带到刑事法庭问罪,判定相应的刑罚。…

Achieving a meaningful market correction of property prices

By Property Soul Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam told…