Story from Hainan Phoenix Channel
Translated by Terry Xu/ Image by Chen Weilin

Fugitive deported back to country by Hainan police authorities after four year hiding in Singapore.

Police authorities at the Hainan Public Security Bureau (PSB) announced on 23rd October that the murder suspect Yang Mo Lu who was hiding beyond borders through the guise of working as an overseas worker in Singapore, was deported back in China by the Chinese police in 22nd October after four years on the run.

It was said that on 23rd February 2011, the family members of a Yang family at Tanmen town in Qionghai City reported to the PSB stating that their son have been murdered by two person, Lu and Hao whose surname are both Yang as well. Through the investigation of the Qionghai PSB ,  it was verified that suspects Lu and Hao had conspired together to rob the victim of his belongings. On an evening of March of 2009, the victim was beaten to death by suspect Lu at a village park west of Qionghai City Tanmen town, and was robbed of the motorcycle and gold ring. Suspects Lu and Hao later buried the body of the victim in a nearby farm.

It was later in 22nd February 2011 that suspect Hao turned himself in to the authorities. In 11th January 2011, Qiong Hai procuratorate made a decision to issue an arrest warrant for suspect Lu on charges of his involvement in robbery. It was then known through investigation that Lu had escaped overseas as an oversea worker in Singapore after he had committed the crime and have never returned since.

In February 2012, the provincial PSB submitted the case to the central PSB to contact the Singapore Police Force (SPF)  for assistance in locating Lu and arrest him. The central PSB placed this request in high priority and conveyed the details of Lu escaping to Singapore to the Singapore Police Force.

On 17th October, Central PSB and the provincial PSB both sent representatives to form a task force that traveled over to Singapore to arrest the suspect. When the task force arrived at Singapore, they received vigorous assistance provided by the SPF and the Singapore’s China Embassy in apprehending Lu. With the support by the foreign affairs and the Singapore based China embassy, along with the cooperation of the SPF, the task force deported Lu from Singapore back to Hainan on the afternoon of 22th October.

Under the command of the police bureau, along with the cooperation of the PSB at Haikou Meilan airport , Haikou Meilan airport immigrations and Qionghai City PSB, the exchange of suspect was completed successfully and he has since been lead back to Qionghai PSB for investigations.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新加坡能复制大马变天?(3) “自由主义专制国” 覃炳鑫:行动党营造恐惧层层操控

历史学者覃炳鑫认为,新加坡当权政府人民行动党对国家公器的使用和社会结构操控,都有别于马来西亚。他从历史进展过程和体制角度,分析新马两国的不同之处,阐述新加坡当权者,拥有极度倾斜的选举游戏规则、高度集中的权利,还有近乎包山包海的社会文化控制,成为新加坡变天的层层阻碍。 从社会经济层面,国阵并没有如人民行动党一般,集中式地垄断政权。“1955年选举,国阵横扫51席。不过在一些地方议会却败给反对党(而后国阵索性取消掉地方议会选举,直到今天仍未回复)。在此后选举,也无法掌控一些州属政权,如吉兰丹和登嘉楼。” “1969年,513事件爆发,当时国阵宣布进入紧急状态、悬空国会,推出新经济政策、国家五大原则等有利国阵政权的政策。在1974年,说服民政党和伊斯兰党加入国阵。” 覃炳鑫是在本月18日,出席在邻国柔佛举行的“新加坡能复制大马变天?”时事论坛上,列出处以上历史事实,让出席者了解马新两国、国阵和人民行动党之间的差异,从而得知两国面对的不同处境。 他说明,国阵从未如行动党般,享有过绝对论断的政权,马国幅员较广、社群多元,政治体制分为多层次。 相对下,人民行动党在1959年取得政权后,马上废除地方议会、市镇会选举,权力集中,取消各独立组织,或以新组织取而代之,例如直接由总理管辖的人民协会。 再者,破坏新闻独立,把所有媒体由国家掌控。至于可能成为异议分子温床的律师公会、宗教团体、工会和独中等,不是被收编就是被废除。 https://youtu.be/jng2bchnu-U 一个“自由主义专制国” 他引述《悉尼先驱晨报》对人民行动党的描述: 透过司法、控制媒体、以及恶法打压异议份子,藉此牢牢掌控政权。新加坡属自由民主(liberal democracy)政体,但是有形无实,使他成为一个“自由主义专制国家”(liberal…

“林郑承诺成立独立调查会”? 亚洲新闻台被踢爆传假消息

香港打假脸书专页“求验传媒”踢爆,新加坡《亚洲新闻台》前日报导香港特首林郑月娥新闻发布会,指林郑已承诺,将成立独立工作队伍,调查港警涉及暴力的指控。 “求验传媒”狠批亚洲新闻台错得离谱,“请问林郑月娥何时表示过会成立独立调查委员会/团队去调查警员暴力?” 事实上,林郑月娥在前日(20日)的记者会上,仅表示会建立民间对话平台、加强和社会各界人士的沟通。 对于警察暴力,她指出根据最新数字显示,在独立监察警方处理投诉委员会(简称警监会,IPCC),收到有关警方执法的投诉中,有174宗为“须汇报个案”,当中有53宗涉及元朗白衣人袭击事件,占当中三成。 她表示,监警会将就审视工作聘请外国专家协助,以确保客观性。 但是,在记者会上她由始至终,都从未提及要成立一个专司调查警察暴力的独立工作队。 至于《亚洲新闻台》上载到youtube的新闻视频,主播一开始即表示“林郑月娥承诺,将成立对话平台,以及独立调查工作队伍,以调查警察暴力”。 事实上,成立独立调查委员会乃是香港民间和人权组织的呼吁,他们要求香港政府必须立即成立独立委员会,调查警方对待反修例抗争者出现疑似过度使用武力的问题。 当时有记者追问,会否答应民间五大诉求之一,即彻查警方、以及成立独立调查委会,林郑月娥则回应,监警会就是独立公平的法定机构,坚持只由所谓的监警会对警方的投诉进行调查。 她指监警会成员不论背景都要独立履行工作,监警会处理警员投诉时亦有委派观察员到场视察,现时已有过百名观察员工作。 相信是《亚洲新闻台》把既有的监警会,和香港民间一直敦促政府成立的独立调查委员会相混淆,结果作出错误报导。 不过,在“求验传媒”曝光该新闻台出错一小时后,有关视频已经转为“私人”,无法再观看。…

重申“不放心让前囚犯当保安” 有色眼镜看前囚犯   林谋泉挨批 

在上周五(6月8日),蒙巴登国会议员林谋泉一则解释为何前囚犯不适合担任民居保安的脸书评论,引来网民抨击,除了愤慨林谋泉言论已偏离黄丝带运动的精神,也认为政府带着有色眼镜标签有前科者,打击他们重新展开新生活的信心。 林谋泉强调,要警方给第二次机会,说易行难。“如果你是公寓的居民,你会放心让一个在不久前(2016年)有犯罪记录的人当保安吗?有些人不介意,但其他人会。试问有多少家长会让小孩向一名前娈童犯学游泳?”他建议这名前囚犯可以在其他领域如销售或餐饮业任职。 事缘人民党成员乔立盟于本月6日在个人脸书专页揭露,一名居住在波东巴西的居民,在刑满出狱后一直寻找工作。他向新加坡警察部队申请保安执照时,后者鉴于他有前科,以“非恰当适任者”(not a fit and proper person)为由拒绝他的申请。 待业半年  要养4子女 事主向乔立盟申诉,申请德士执照也因有前科被拒。即使已通过保安课程,申请保安执照的过程仍被警方回绝。约30余岁的事主育有4子女,半年来一边找工作,一边打零工养活妻儿,若一直未有稳定收入,一家生计令人堪忧。 据乔立盟指出,事主是前正规步兵,只因在2016年不满妻子被搭讪,而殴伤一名建筑工友,致使事主被判入狱6个月。…

99.7% of jobs created in 2015 went to foreigners

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) released its preliminary report on Thursday, announcing an…