Family of Dinesh Raman will appeal today’s decision

SINGAPORE, October 16, 2013– Today, Singapore High Court Justice Tay Yong Kwang dismissed the application for judicial review of the Corner’s decision to discontinue the inquiry into the death of 21 year old Singaporean, Dinesh Ramesh, who died in the custody of guards in Changi Prison. The application for review was filed by Dinesh’s mother, Madam Selvi D/O Narayanasamy, who was represented by lawyers Mr M Ravi and Mr Eugene Thuraisingam. Mdm Selvi states that she is deeply disappointed in the High Court’s decision and she will make an application to take her case to the Court of Appeal.

In reply submissions filed in court today, Mdm Selvi’s attorneys highlighted that in the Coroner’s Notes of Evidence, it was documented that the Coroner had made only one single statement of inquiry upon learning that senior prison guard Deputy Superintendent Lim Kwo Yin, 36, had pled guilty to “death by negligence” before concluding that there was no reason to resume his inquiry into the cause of Disnesh Raman’s death.

The Coroner’s notes reveal that the Coroner asked one and only question, “What should he have done?” The question refers to Officer Lim’s act of negligence.

The Coroner was informed that Deputy Superintendent Lim should “have discovered, should have intervened earlier.

“The fact that [the Coroner] asked cursorily what the officer should have done and left it as that, shows that the Coroner had already decided to not resume the inquiry because someone had been charged, and certainly not because the criminal proceedings make it unnecessary for him to investigate how the deceased came to his death.  How could he come to this rational decision without having asked any questions or without having considered the conditioned statements tendered to him?” Mdm Selvi’s attorneys inquired in their written reply to the Prosecution submitted in the Court today.

Please refer to the Applicant’s Submissions and Reply Submissions attached

OS 753 OF 2013 – Applicant’s Reply Submissions

OS 753 of 2013 – Applicant’s Submissions 14.10.13

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

张素兰:总理新闻秘书礼拜天也要工作

人权律师、前政治拘留者张素兰,今早在功能八号氏族会脸书专页,揶揄总理新闻秘书周日休假也要加班工作。 事缘本周日(本月1日),李总理新闻秘书张俪霖,代表总理向本社总编许渊臣发函,指本社英语站在8月15日刊登的一篇评论,复述针对总理的不实指控,要求本社撤下并在三日内道歉。 但张素兰指出,虽然秘书加班,用着公家的笔墨,撰写了长达三页含有威胁意味信函,但他加班并不是在为国家公务工作。 “总理因为有关评论被指复述此前他弟妹作出的指控,感到不满。在信中,总理称选择不起诉弟妹,不应被诠释为容许他人复述和散播这些指控。” 但张素兰也指出,随着总理要求本社总编许渊臣移除有关文章、并作出道歉,这同样也可视作总理可能已改变主意,不再避忌是否起诉弟妹李显扬和李玮玲医生。 她认为,如果诉诸诉讼,总理也要准备应对,许渊臣可邀请其弟妹作为证人,甚至请他们成为第二或第三答辩人。 “作为寻常百姓,我们并不知道真相。总理称在2017年的国会辩论中已给与充分解释,但仍是片面的”,张素兰也指出,她认为当时为了私人纠纷,特别召开听证会,乃是浪费公帑且滥用议会程序。更何况当时总理弟妹也没有受邀对此事进行辩解。 “或许是时候透过法庭来解决此事。” 除了张素兰外,昨日资深媒体人兼《海峡时报》前副总编辑默乐(Bertha Henson)则质问,总理选择不起诉弟妹,但是不容许他人复述、散播他们的指控,难道意味着总理的弟妹可以畅所欲言,但是其他人如果重复他们的言论就不可以?

Singapore leaders on Singapore

“This is your country.” Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong ————- “We are…

SDP blasts PAP yet again

Note: This is of last night’s rally on Friday, 29th April 2011.…

“We want to live together in peace and harmony”

Punggol North festival has been an annual grassroots initiative since 2005, celebrating…