Focus on Healthcare is a five-part series that provides a critical analysis of Singapore’s healthcare system, popularly known as the 3M system (MediShield, Medisave, Medifund). Through it, we hope to provide an understanding of how healthcare financing is currently being funded and used in Singapore, and explore the ways in which this can be further enhanced to cater for the needs of Singaporeans.

This is the fourth in the series, where we will explore how Singapore stacks up against other developed countries in terms of healthcare expenditure.

 

By Leong Sze Hian and Roy Ngerng

Singapore’s 3M system has often been touted as one of the best in the world, but we have examined in previous parts of this series that this much-vaunted system has some clear lacks in terms of government subsidy of healthcare expenditure, with a disproportionately high amount of the bill being paid for by employers and individuals.

How, then, does Singapore compare against other developed countries in terms of expenditure by the government in support of citizens’ healthcare needs?

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO)’s World Health Statistics 2013 report, Singapore has the third highest Gross National Product (GNP) per capita, compared to the top 17 countries (Chart 1).

chart1_part4

Chart 1

However, Singapore actually spends the least on health, as a proportion of GDP (Chart 2). This data is obtained from the Global Health Observatory Data Repository. Indeed, compared to other developed countries, Singapore has the lowest per capita total expenditure on healthcare (Chart 3). It would then seem consequential as well that Singapore’s per capita government expenditure on healthcare (Chart 4) is the lowest in the developed world.

chart2_part4

Chart 2

chart3_part4

Chart 3

 

chart4_part4

Chart 4

On the surface of this, it would seem that healthcare in Singapore is either really affordable even with the government’s low contribution rate, or Singaporeans are generally healthy enough to have minimal contact with their doctors. Consequently, our government spend less of our state resources funding healthcare, and it seems that the much-feared over-consumption of healthcare services is held at bay, and our GDP is protected for the future.

Is this the complete picture?

Consider this: Even though Singapore has the lowest per capita total expenditure, Singaporeans actually pay the most out-of-pocket for their healthcare, compared to people in other developed nations (Chart 5). As a proportion of our nation’s total healthcare spending, we also pay more compared to people in other developed nations (Chart 6).

chart5_part4

Chart 5

chart6_part4

Chart 6

In addition, the Singapore government also spends the least on healthcare, as a proportion of the total expenditure on healthcare (Chart 7). This also means that Singaporeans are the highest out-of-pocket spenders on healthcare, which refers to “direct payments” made by Singaporeans.

chart7_part4

Chart 7

To look at it in another perspective, for every hundred dollars that the government spends, Singaporeans would need to pay Int$219 (Chart 8). Comparatively, for the Dutch and Danish, for every hundred dollars that their governments spend, they would need only spend Int$17.

 

chart8_part4

Chart 8

If we look at the government’s health expenditure as a proportion of GDP again and chart it against the GDP per capita, you would see that the Singapore government’s spending on healthcare is not on par with the country’s national wealth (Chart 9) – Singapore is ranked the third richest country by the WHO but the government spends less than other countries with a lower GDP.

chart9_part4

Chart 9

Perhaps this apparent abnormality is only a recent development given recent global economic conditions that have clearly impacted the GDP of other developed countries?

Not so. If we compare the trend of Singapore’s health spending with other countries, you can see the government’s expenditure has remained low, relative to other developed countries, over the past ten or more years (Chart 10).

Meanwhile, out-of-pocket expenditure for Singaporeans have grown to be the highest among the other countries, at a rate that is faster than other countries (Chart 11).

chart10_part4

Chart 10chart11_part4

Chart 11

Even though the other developed countries have higher per capita total expenditure, their governments would step in to help defray the costs for its people. However, because of the low government expenditure in Singapore, Singaporeans are forced to pay for their medical expenses out of their own pockets at an even higher rate.

In effect, while we might seem to be prudent in our national healthcare expenditure, the reality is that when compared to other developed countries, this prudence reflects a significant lack in how our government sees itself supporting the healthcare needs of citizens.

MK Lim had also explained in the Annals, Academy of Medicine, Singapore that, “The 3M system was explicitly designed to curb over-consumption … (but) the result has (only) been the successful moderation of the government’s share of total expenditure, but not private spending. It can be observed that total health care spending has in fact risen exponentially, despite the 3M system being in place.”

And according to Chapter 3 on “Fiscal context and health expenditure patterns” in the WHO’s Implementing Health Financing Reform report: “International comparisons have long shown that poorer countries tend to rely more on private sources and richer countries on public sources.”

Indeed, the higher a country’s GDP per capita, the lower the proportion of out-of-pocket health spending that is required from the individuals.

Why, then, is Singapore bucking the trend?

The government might harp on preventing over-consumption as a planning principle, but has it instead been the case that Singapore’s health spending is low because of under-consumption?

Of course, the claim from our government would likely be that each country has unique circumstances. But the figures that stare us in the face clearly point to the fact that, in terms of supporting citizens for their healthcare needs, Singapore can hardly be called First World.

As a high-income country and a city which has become the 5th and 6th most expensive in the world, the high prices have placed immense pressure on Singapore’s purchasing power, which is now the lowest among the high-income countries. There is a clear responsibility from the government to ensure that Singaporeans will continue to be able to access affordable and quality healthcare, and it is time to stop being wishy-washy about it.

In the next part, we examine why it is imperative for the government to better support citizens for our healthcare needs.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MP Louis Ng shares tribute post about two COVID-19 infected migrant workers, where one died of injuries at Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, another died of heart attack

On Tuesday (28 April), Member of Parliament (MP) of Nee Soon Group…

Renown primatologist Dr Jane Goodall is shocked by Singaporean mentality that "animals belong in a zoo"

Renowned researcher Dr Jane Goodall, known best for revolutionising our understanding of…

上网预购旅游配套要提防“销售陷阱”? 竞消委拟新准则吁提高透明度

现今因网络发达,民众经常以网络解决许多事务,其中更包括网络预购旅游配套,但大家是否有发现,在被网络预购的旅游配套,或促销活动吸引购买后,最后付出的价格却比预期的还要多?为了提高价格透明度,竞消委拟定一套准则清楚说明哪些行为可能抵触法令,协助业者清晰显示价格并宣传。 新加坡竞争与消费者委员会(Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore,简称竞消委)自去年4月接管保护消费者公平交易法令的相关事务后,首次针对业界竞争机制及消费者权益课题进行市场研究。 该调查于去年7月至今年4月间进行,共参考38种旅游预订网站的做法,并邀请750个业者,包括航空公司和酒店在内进行访谈调查。竞消委也会针对所有消费品供应商制定价格透明度准则,并征询公众意见。 竞消委昨日(30日)公开调查结果,表示我国消费者近年转向透过网络预订、比价以及购买相关旅游配套如机票和住宿,大部分均透过供应商的官方网站、网络旅行社(如Expedia、Booking.com)以及免费比价搜索引擎(Skyscanner, Trivago)之管道购买,但上述管道虽有其便利之处,但却容易出现“陷阱”。 网络预购旅游配套四大陷阱,竞消委供业者准则参考 报告内也指出四种常遇“陷阱”,即逐步加价(drip…