Focus on Healthcare is a five-part series that provides a critical analysis of Singapore’s healthcare system, popularly known as the 3M system (MediShield, Medisave, Medifund). Through it, we hope to provide an understanding of how healthcare financing is currently being funded and used in Singapore, and explore the ways in which this can be further enhanced to cater for the needs of Singaporeans.

In this second part, we take a look at exactly how much we have in the 3M piggy bank, and how best it can be spent before we have to consider raising premiums or taxes.

 

By Roy Ngerng and Leong Sze Hian

Following his announcement during the National Day Rally 2013 to tweak the 3M system, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced that government healthcare subsidies will increase, and that the MediShield Life premiums and Medisave contribute rates will also be increased, to foot the increase in healthcare spending, because “we each have to take personal responsibility for ourselves.”

A few days later, Channel NewsAsia reported that PM Lee had “reiterated that while the government will do more, ‘good things need to be paid for’.” He also said, “If I’m discussing whether to raise taxes or not, I think I will never finish that discussion. So, one day when we have to raise taxes, the government will just have to make up its mind and say, ‘ok, I have to decide, I have to do this, I have to persuade people’, because otherwise it’s not workable.”

It was also reported in the Today newspaper that, “the government is unlikely to raise income tax to pay for the slew of healthcare, housing and infrastructure initiatives announced.” Rather, “the Goods and Services Tax (GST) might instead be the first in line for an increase should the Government need to raise revenue.”

However, as some observers have noted, Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam had said in the run-up to the general election in 2011 that the GST will not be raised “at least for five years” because, he said, “there’s absolutely no reason to raise the GST.” We are only two years into this “five years”.

But how much do Singaporeans have in their MediShield and Medisave right now? And is there a need for Singaporeans to pay more, either through additional premiums or taxes?

For Medisave, in 2012, there was a total balance of $60 billion but the amount withdrawn for direct medical expenses was only $768 million – this effectively makes up only 1.3% of the total balance.

For MediShield, Parliament had also revealed that the MediShield surplus is $850 million for the last 10 years. In 2011, only $282 million MediShield claims were made. This means that only 24.9% of the known MediShield reserves had been claimed.

Finally, for Medifund, in 2012, the capital sum is $3 billion. Of this, only $98.2 million was disbursed in 2012. This represents only 3.3% of the capital.

In graphic terms:

medisavechart2

If we take these figures as an annual average, the withdrawals from Medisave make up only 1% of the balance, MediShield only 25%, and Medifund only 3%.

Adding them all up, there would be about $64 billion in balance in the 3Ms. The total of $1 billion spent would make up only 1.8% of the total 3M balance.

The question to ask: What happened to the rest of the 98.2% – or $63 billion – of the 3M balance?

What’s more, if we look back at the Medisave balance, the amount has been steadily increasing while the amount withdrawn has been slowing down.

In 2012, there was an increase of 9.5% in the total Medisave balance, from $54.8 billion to $60 billion. However, for the amount withdrawn, it only grew by less than a tenth of it, at 0.9%, from $761 million to $768 million.

Moreover, Medisave is also invested in Singapore government bonds, which earn annualised returns of 16% in S$ terms for the last 39 years, and about 6% in US$ terms for the last 20 years, respectively.

From the statistics above, it would seem that there is no deficit in running the Medisave, MediShield and Medifund schemes. On the contrary, the government is accumulating a huge surplus of more than 98% of the 3M balance.

To be clear, since the 3M schemes have high accumulated surpluses, they don’t actually cost the government a single cent. In fact, because Singaporeans are forking up the money through taxes and Medisave, they are in effect paying for their own healthcare bills by themselves. Worse yet, they are paying a portion of their own wages into these schemes, without seeing significant real returns comparable to those obtained by the government, whilst these schemes continue to accumulate surpluses.

Watch this space for part three, where we will try to work out the sums that will continue financing our healthcare needs without incurring additional taxes or premiums. And no, we are not trying to take over the Finance Minister’s job…

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

ICA makes it easier for PRC travellers to visit S’pore

Travellers from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) will no longer need…

Dr Tan Cheng Bock agrees with PM Lee about the ideal Presidential Candidate

Dr Tan Cheng Bock wrote on his Facebook page on Monday (5…

净利下滑23.4巴仙至逾2亿元 报业控股削5巴仙人手

新加坡报业控股昨日发文告,公布2019财年业绩。其中,截至今年8月底的全年净利,下跌23.4巴仙,至2亿1320万元。 集团营运收入下跌2.4巴仙至9亿5930万元,房地产领域收入改善抵消表现欠佳的媒体业务。全年营运盈利减12.2巴仙,报1亿8690万元。 媒体业务营收下滑12巴仙(7890万元)至5亿7690万元,纸媒广告收入也下滑14.9巴仙;发行收入减少7.3巴仙。 报业控股集团总裁伍逸松称,媒体业务仍继续面对挑战,纸媒广告和发行营收仍下跌,不过该集团在数码转型策略取得进展,数码广告和发行量增加。 他以集团旗下华文报推出平板电子报配套为例,配合附送三星平板电脑,吸引逾万人订阅。 料130人被裁员 然而,尽管各平台受众增长,惟该集团宣称收入仍面对挑战,且当前不确定经济前景也影响广告主减少打广告开支。故此,将“精简”媒体业务,预计在本季度削减雇员人数约五巴仙,相当于130人。 受影响的部门为媒体方案和杂志业务,新闻编采部似乎不受影响。 伍逸松声称,重组却让该集团在各媒体平台提供更有效的整合方案,来应对广告客户和读者不断提升的需求。该集团将在严格管控成本之下,继续投资在新闻室和数码媒体。 据了解,报业控股已通知人力部和职总,并依据创意媒体及印刷业联合会(CMPU)协商,在双方同意的条件下赔偿被裁员工。 报业控股投资英国学生宿舍 据了解,报业控股在去年9月收购的英国学生宿舍,取得3640万元营收。该集团进一步拓展投资到英国10个城市的5059个,资产规模超过6亿元。…

SG wants to live with Covid while Israel rethinks this strategy as death figure goes up

Last month (24 Jun), ministers Gan Kim Yong, Lawrence Wong and Ong…