TOC Editorial

The Online Citizen is concerned about the latest attempts by the government to clamp down on Singapore’s online space – specifically, forcing new website The Independent Singapore to be class-licensed under the Broadcasting Act.

Our government has never been adept at engaging its citizens online, but this latest example highlights its intention to continue utilising the blunt end of legislation to quell criticism.

While the sensible course of action would be to engage any opposing voice robustly and openly, our government has instead opted for the excesses of regulatory recourse.

In the case of The Independent,the public is still left uncertain about the specific circumstances of the website’s alleged association with foreign funding. The Independent has stated categorically to the contrary, and MDA has yet to justify its actions.

Such opacity can only have a chilling effect on online enterprises, as any website that seeks commercial viability would now have no clearer idea of how they can potentially run afoul of the law. That such unjustified actions should be directed at a website that has yet to be launched again speaks of the animus that our government has towards the online community.

Sadly, this has only been confirmed by our Defence Minister, who claims “distortions, rumours, untruths, misinformation and smears” online are a threat to national security. Such intemperate language can come across as fear-mongering. Such fear is not well substantiated, as Dr Ng has not given examples of how chaos has taken place in Singapore as a result of “DRUMS”.

In short, our government needs to stop promoting a fear of the Internet, and start taking affirmative actions when citizens cry out online for attention. Singaporeans are smart enough to see through unsubstantiated fear-mongering. Perhaps its time they got off their soap box, and did some real engagement instead.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

What kind of image is the Singapore government hoping to cultivate?

Hosting a well known dictator (including paying for his accommodation and expenses…

PSP calls for “greater affirmative action” by the authorities following reports of high number of local employers practicing discriminatory hiring

The Progress Singapore Party (PSP) took to Facebook today (10 August) to…

【选举】无惧市镇会诉讼影响 毕丹星:工人党表现选民有目共睹

工人党秘书长毕丹星表示,阿裕尼-后港的居民对于工人党的贡献有目共睹,并将在来临大选作出选择。 受询及阿裕尼-后港市镇会诉讼案,是否会对此次选情造成影响,毕丹星于今日(26日)在线上记者会表示,2015年至今,阿裕尼-后港市镇会的表现,未造成引起居民忧虑的问题,将市镇会的财务表现拿出来,是可以和新加坡其他集选区相比的。 因此对他而言,重新评估市镇会成员的表现更为关键。根据他的观察,不论是居民和阿裕尼-后港市镇会,都在工人党选区做得很好。 与此同时,他也证实工人党主席林瑞莲、原议员费沙、贝理安、严燕松将继续留守阿裕尼集选区。

总理李显龙更新脸书头像 戴迷彩布口罩

总理李显龙今日(23日)更新他的官方脸书头像,发布自己戴上布口罩的自拍照。 照片中可见他穿戴着深绿色数字迷彩布口罩,并表示感谢Sheila和Hedy Khoo母女为他缝制的这件布口罩,并赞扬非常实用和时尚。 总理曾在今年1月30日,表示理解国人无法买到口罩的焦虑,但重申只有身体不适时才需要戴口罩。他指出,卫生部建议只有生病时才需要戴口罩。如果身体健康就不用。 不过,随着本地疫情局势升温,总理李显龙在本月3日的直播中,坦言政府重新思考对口罩的建议。 “之前建议民众不适才戴口罩,当时还没有社群传播,且政府仍给每户家庭四张口罩。但如今社群中可能仍有未发现的感染者,也可能传染给人,故此世卫组织和美国传染病中心也在重新检讨。但目前也有证据显示,冠状病毒19感染者也可能没出现症状,仍会把病毒传给他人。” 故此,对于那些可能已被感染而不自知的,穿戴口罩也可保护他人。也能让年长者获得更好的保护。