By Terry Xu

Singapore has its first victim in the current dengue fever epidemic. The victim was a 20-year-old Singaporean Chinese male who was seen at Tan  Tock Seng Hospital’s (TTSH) emergency department (ED) on 23 May and diagnosed as having viral fever. He was sent home after being given a drip by the hospital as reported by Straits Times. He was also asked to visit an outpatient clinic for follow up and a repeat blood test.

Straits Times also reported that Mr Ang went back to the hospital during the wee hours of Friday, 24th May after hitting as high as 39.5 degrees Celsius. He waited for five hours at the hospital before going to a general practitioner near his home according to Mr Ang’s mother. Mr Ang was eventually admitted to TTSH on Saturday night.

According to the joint statement by MOH and NEA, the patient subsequently returned to TTSH’s ED on 26 May and was admitted as a dengue case. During admission, his condition deteriorated despite medical interventions, and he passed away on 29 May.

MOH and NEA joint statement on 30th May 2013 while accounting for the death of the dengue fever victim, emphasized more on the urgency for greater community vigilance to stamp out possible mosquito breeding spots and promising more control operations at the vicinity of the case’s residence.

“MOH and NEA wish to express our deepest condolences to the family of the  deceased patient. We strongly encourage all Singaporeans to take appropriate precautions to prevent mosquito breeding by doing the Mozzie Wipeout weekly.”

It is pretty surprising that no one asked about or accounted for the statement by Mr Ang’s mother that this patient was allowed to wait for 5 hours  on last Friday, 24th May before he made the decision to leave to consult a general practicioner and being re-admitted to the hospital the day after.

Questions like why wasn’t Mr Ang being diagnosed with dengue fever during the first consultation? Given that more than 8,000 people have come down with dengue fever since the start of the year, why given the current dengue fever epidemic that fever patients are not given special attention? Why Mr Ang wasn’t asked to stay longer on 23th May to observe for signs of dengue fever if he has not been diagnosed with one?

MOH has chosen to push the issue to the dengue fever epidemic in its statement but in light of Mr Ang being made to seek private medical consultation after a 5 hours wait in his condition,it seems that the hospital’s response to the current epidemic is something that the public would probably want answers from.

Is waiting time up to five hours or more so common that it is no longer required to explain for the long wait that patients with serious illness or conditions are subjected to? Is there enough beds in the hospital where patients can stay to be observed by the medical professionals? Would MOH care to explain?

Would also wish to extend sincere condolences to the family members of Mr Ang on their loss of a beloved family member.

You May Also Like

(工人党市镇会风波)辩方:五年前许文远表明市镇会可灵活处理免招标

在市镇会诉讼案中,代表工人党议员等各造的辩方律师CR 拉惹揭露,早在五年前,时任国家发展部长许文远曾表明,只要依循市镇会法,市镇会可灵活决定,是否公开招标管理代理公司。 当时许文远称,政府虽不插手市镇会委任代理公司,惟需确保每项交易处理得当、维护公众利益。 CR拉惹称,时任阿裕尼-后港市镇会主席的林瑞莲,正是行使此市镇会规章,直接委任FMSS成为该市镇会管理代理,而“国家发展部对林瑞莲的决定没有反对。” 他续辩解,2011年大选后,人民行动党从人民党手上接管波东巴西市镇会时,也透过免除招标委任EM Services为管理代理,避免服务中断影响居民生活。 CR拉惹是在10月10日的法庭审讯环节,盘问诉方证人、毕马威新加坡会计事务所Owen Hawkes,提出上述佐证,试图反驳诉方对管理代理公司未公开招标的质疑。CR拉惹也追问,何以Hawkes在审计报告中未涵括政府对类似课题的立场。 对此,Hawkes则表明,不明白为何政府会认为,直接委任管理代理成为避免服务中断的唯一途径。再者,独立会计师的指责,乃是检视市镇会免除招标的情境、如何执行、以及做法是否符合市镇会财务条例,没有必要考虑政府的立场。 针对诉方指阿裕尼-后港市镇会,委任FMSS为管理代理公司,比起CPG还要多花51万新元,代表FMSS负责人侯文芳夫妻的辩护律师Leslie Netto指出,其中9万乃是为了吸纳原后港员工而支付的薪资。 诉方指51万元额外费用包括42万元的后港市镇运作差价和接管原后港员工所支付费用。但是Netto指出,当时FMSS“不终止这些中心职员的合同”,再者这是一次性付款,不应算在FMSS管理费中。…

AHPETC fined $800 for holding trade fair without approval from NEA

Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) has been fined $800 by the courts…

选举局:选区竞选广播将从7月3日至7日

选举局公布,选区竞选广播将从7月3日至7日,晚上7点开始播出。而两场政党竞选广播则分别在7月2日和9日播放。 日前,选举局宣布不会有任何集会,竞选期间将会提供选区竞选广播,让候选人透过电视进行宣传。 选区竞选广播将通过电视5频道播出,单选区候选人有三分钟的演说时间,而竞逐四人或五人集选区的竞选团队则有12或15分钟的时间。 候选人可任意选择任何一种官方语言发言。 至于政党竞选广播,唯有至少派出6名的候选人的政党才获得分配广播时段。政党竞选广播将在19个电视和电台频道上播放。 若候选人欲透过网络直播,选举局也将提供场地,供各政党申请。欲使用者可从本月30日,即提名日当天提出申请。 其直播时间为,7月1日至8日,每天均有三段直播时间:早上7点到10点、中午12点到下午3点和晚上7点到10点。 每段直播时段值107元,而当局仅会提供电力、网络和基本设施,候选人必须自行确保直播顺利进行 当局也提醒候选人,无论是在这些场地或其他地方进行直播,得遵守现有条例,而他们也必须向选举官通报会使用哪些平台进行直播。外国人不能参与直播活动。

Joseph Nathan: 李显龙正为自己寻找“大出口”?

译自:Joseph Nathan脸书贴文 “大手笔支出”(BIG SPENDING),似乎已成为目前人民行动党(PAP)的新标志。从奢华的200年周年纪念,到更奢华的国庆群众大会晚宴(National Day Rally),他们不再像以前的“护国先贤”那样,认真接触老百姓和谨慎开支人民血汗钱。 诚然,部分金钱已用在回馈建国与立国一代,但与他们的报酬和福利相比,这些“少许的派息”就如同小小的花生一般微乎其微。 尽管有消费税折扣券和水电费回扣,但对比最近的水电费涨幅便可知道,我们需要付出多少,又有多少是可回扣的。尽管降幅缓慢,但我们的购买力确实在下降。为此,贫穷与劳工阶级只会愈来愈穷。故,为什么我们还要选择一个根本不管我们死活的领导人? 即使我们可以原谅人民行动党,未能实现瑞士生活水平的承诺,我不知道他们否也忘了,曾答应新加坡人民,为我们创造一个利益相关者经济的承诺,让每位人民能够从我们富有成功的经济,获取均等的派息。然而,直到今日,我们的前总统陈庆炎已退休卸任都还未兑现,我想问我们还可以问谁关于这“未兑现”的承诺? 尽管多年来他们一直误判,导致他们不得不补上其他政策。但最近,我们几乎可看见每位部长正为自己的政策贴上“实惠”(affordable)的标签,再重新包装成为“成功事迹”,难道这些“实惠”的标签就成为他们的新的护身符吗? 我无法理解的是,为何没有一个第四代政客(the 4G…