MEDIA STATEMENT

Thursday, 30 May 2013

MAJOR ONLINE WEBSITES IN SINGAPORE TO PROTEST AGAINST LICENSING REQUIREMENT

The Media Development Authority had, on Tuesday, introduced a “licensing framework” that would require “online news sites” to put up a “performance bond” of $50,000 and “comply within 24 hours to MDA’s directions to remove content that is found to be in breach of content standards”.

As part of the community of websites in Singapore that provide sociopolitical news and analysis to Singaporeans, we are concerned about the impact of the newly-introduced requirement on fellow Singaporeans’ ability to receive diverse news information.

While the S$50,000 performance bond is a drop in the ocean for a mainstream news outlet with an online presence, it would potentially be beyond the means of volunteer run and personal blogging platforms like ours. Hence, MDA’s claim that the licensing regime is intended to equalize the playing field between online and offline news is incorrect: the regulations will disproportionately affect us.

Further, we believe that the introduction of the licensing regime has not gone through the proper and necessary consultation and had been introduced without clear guidance. In a typical public consultation exercise, a government agency will publish a draft regulation with detailed explanation and issue a press release to invite members of the public to send in feedback for consideration. We observe this is not the case for the licensing regime.

We call on the Ministry of Communications and Information to withdraw the licensing regime. We call upon our elected representatives to oppose the licensing regime.

It is in the interest of Singaporeans and the long-term future for Singapore that the licensing regime be withdrawn.

The new licensing regime has the very real potential to reduce the channels available to Singaporeans to receive news and analysis of the sociopolitical situation in Singapore and it is in the interest of all Singaporeans to guard against the erosion and availability of news channels that Singaporeans should rightfully have access to.

These new regulations significantly impact Singaporeans’ constitutionally protected right to free speech, and they should not be introduced without the most rigorous public debate and discussion.

The new regulations, and the manner in which they have been imposed by regulatory fiat, are unacceptable in any developed democracy.

 

Leong Sze Hian http://leongszehian.com/
Andrew Loh http://publichouse.sg/
Ravi Philemon http://www.raviphilemon.net/
Kumaran Pillai http://sgvoize.wordpress.com/
Terry Xu https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/
Richard Wan http://www.tremeritus.com/
Choo Zheng Xi https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/
Howard Lee https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/
Rachel Zeng

http://rachelzeng.wordpress.com/,

http://singaporeantideathpenaltycampaign.wordpress.com/

Roy Ngerng http://thehearttruths.com/
Kirsten Han http://spuddings.net/
Gilbert Goh http://www.transitioning.org/
Nizam Ismail http://nizamosaurus.wordpress.com/
Lynn Lee http://www.lianainfilms.com/
Biddy Low http://publichouse.sg/
Alex Au http://yawningbread.wordpress.com/
Martyn See http://singaporerebel.blogspot.sg/
Howard Lee https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/
Elaine Ee http://publichouse.sg/
Lim Han Thon http://publichouse.sg/
Joshua Chiang http://www.facebook.com/joshuafly
Donaldson Tan http://newasiarepublic.com
Stephanie Chok http://littlemskaypoh.wordpress.com
Jolovan Wham http://www.workfairsingapore.wordpress.com

 

If you would like more information or for media enquires, please contact Howard Lee at [email protected]

For queries on TOC’s position on the media regulations and how they potentially impact the website, our media contact person will be Choo Zheng Xi

You May Also Like

Just for laughs…

Just thought I’d share this with everyone – for a laugh. Or…

20 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 7 cases in the community

As of Saturday noon (8 May), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

Coronavirus: Taiwan poised to become the world’s second-largest mask producer

Taiwan projects to produce 10 million masks per day and poised to…

杨莉明:推迟提款政府无利可图 网民要求准时发放公积金

公积金课题与民息息相关,人力部长杨莉明表明,公积金局或政府要求会员推迟领取入息,只是为了让会员享有更多的利息,并非政府有所贪求。此话一出,网民纷纷表示反对,既然政府表示无利可图,就应该在会员满55岁或65岁时,自动发放或者发放50%的金额,让银发一族享受年轻时的收获成果。 但是,杨莉明表示,并不是所有的会员都会在65岁时领取入息。 “截止2017年年底,6成已经达到可领取入息年龄(Payout Eligibility Age,简称PEA)的会员并没有申请入息发放,甚至约一半的70岁会员没有领取入息。” 杨莉明是在2月18日,于国会针对9名议员就公积金退休存款计划(Retirement Sum Scheme,简称RSS)所发出提问时,作出以上回答。 9名议员是就坊间传出有关退休存款计划的会员可领取入息年龄悄悄地从65岁推迟到70岁一事,做出提问。他们分别有林谋泉(蒙巴登区)、方荣发(后港区)和胡美霞(西海岸集选区)等。 公积金局之前曾作出澄清,表示并没有推迟领取入息年龄。 多会员不清楚领款年龄 在2017年的领入息年龄为64岁,而从2018年起,有关年龄已经调整至65岁,且会员最迟必须在70岁开始领取入息。…