We refer to the MDA’s comments in The Straits Times today. The comments state that TOC does not, at present, meet the new licensing requirements for online news sites announced yesterday.

MDA’s failure to explain application of licensing criteria

MDA’s statement fails to explain why the requirements do not apply to TOC at present, while hinting obliquely that they could apply to the website in the future.

Our internal statistics, a screenshot of which is attached, indicate that we meet the visitorship requirement for licensing. The nature of our coverage appears to fall within MDA’s second requirement for licensing.

tocstats_cloudflare

MDA’s failure to explain how it’s new policy is to be applied at present suggest that the manner in which it is being introduced is opaque and arbitrary, and does not give Singaporeans confidence in its clear application in the future.

TOC, as a largely volunteer run enterprise, cannot afford to labour under such continued legal uncertainty. The legal black hole we will be forced to operate in will hamstring our ability to recruit new volunteers.The licensing regime, if applied to volunteer run socio-political websites like TOC, will effectively cripple us. While the S$50,000 performance bond is a drop in the ocean for a mainstream news outlet with an online presence, it would potentially be beyond our means to raise.Hence, MDA’s claim that these regulations are intended to equalize the playing field between online and offline news is incorrect.

The opposite is true: the regulations will have a disproportionate and unequal impact on volunteer run websites like ours and effectively impair our ability to continue operating.

We call on MDA to provide much needed clarity on its new regulations, and to defer their implementation until such clarity is provided.

Call for full Parliamentary debate

Separately, we call on the Ministry of Communications and Information to table the licensing regime for a full debate in Parliament and to defer the implementation of the licensing regime.

It is not appropriate for Singaporeans’ constitutionally protected right to freedom of speech to be sweepingly curtailed by a regulating authority without any public consultation or oversight by our democratically elected legislature.

 

Choo Zheng Xi: Co-Founder, Consultant Editor
Terry Xu: Executive Editor
Howard Lee: Deputy Chief Editor
Lee Song Kwang: Core Team Member, Treasurer

You May Also Like

【总理诉梁实轩】仅凭贴文截图作分析 林鼎质疑供证律师报告

总理李显龙提告时评人梁实轩的诽谤诉讼,于本周二开始至周五(6日至9日),在高庭公堂审理。 在聆讯第二日,诉方传召专家证人潘光俊(Tuan Quang Phan)博士,希望能说明诽谤性贴文的流传度。总理李显龙亦在今日(7日),身着粉红衬衫和灰色西服出庭旁听。 潘博士是香港大学经管学院,市场营销、创新与信息管理副教授,据知他研究社交媒体平台信息传播逾15年。他今日是从香港通过视讯,为官司供证。 不过,潘博士却指出,他并未掌握梁实轩有关涉事脸书贴文的原始数据,仅仅取得一张该帖文的截图。而他根据过往统计研究,作出保守估计。他指梁实轩脸书仅有5千脸书朋友,但他分析实际读到该贴文的人数应该多上好几倍。 有鉴于梁的脸书是公开账号,加之这类政治新闻的受关注程度,他估计至少200至400人读到贴文和所转载文章,在1万1749名面簿用户的“新闻流”。 但潘博士也指出,自己是在总理代表律师文达星事务所的协助下,准备上述报告。林鼎也认为,既然没有梁实轩贴文的流量数据,恐怕潘博士的报告不过是“揣测”(guesswork)。后者则重申这些都是根据过往统计研究,得出的保守估计。 潘博士也指脸书还有“热门话题”功能,但林鼎也随即提醒,这功能是否只有脸书粉丝专页才能操作。 再者,林鼎也质疑潘博士是否中立,包括他在前往香港前,曾在新加坡国立大学从事研究工作长达九年,也曾接受狮城政府不同单位拨款,例如教育部耗资820万元的项目。对此潘博士则驳斥自己从未见过、也否认偏袒总理。 由于梁实轩分享贴文后,包括内政兼律政部长尚穆根、金管局等都已采取行动,并获得主流媒体广泛报导更正消息。但林鼎也斥责,专家报告中却对此只字不提。 梁实轩不供证 …

Fundraising initiated for family who lost a son due to assault by co-workers

Alex Chua created a fund raiser to seek donations from members of public who would like to help Fazli’s family to tide over this trying period after succumbing to injuries sustained from an assault by fellow co-workers and the cause of death is said to be due to cardio respiratory failure.

Joo Chiat fire – an old issue surfaces

Andrew Loh Following the fire which broke out at a restaurant at…

新加坡出现首宗猴痘病例 患者获隔离

据卫生部文告,该部已确认本地出现首宗猴痘(monkeypox)感染病例。 患者是一名38虽的尼日利亚籍男子,他是在4月28日抵狮城,在5月8日确诊患上猴痘。他已在国家传染病中心(NCID)的隔离病房接受治疗,情况稳定。 患者到达我国后曾住在芽笼8巷21号的一家酒店,并在4月29日和30日出席漆街(Church Street)的一个研讨会。 不过,他在30日出现发烧、肌肉酸痛、发冷和皮疹症状,在本月1日至7日则大多留在酒店客房内。最终在7日被送往陈笃生医院,并在同一天被转介到国家传染病中心。 卫生部文告指患者在前来狮城前,曾在尼日利亚参加一个婚宴上,可能食用过野味。野味也是猴痘的传染源之一。 该部也联系了23名曾于患者亲密接触过的人士,包括18名一同与患者参加研讨会的成员、一名研讨会场地职员和四名酒店员工。 国家传染病中心对他们进行评估并进行疫苗接种,以预防可能出现传染,作为预防措施,他们也被隔离21日。卫生部表示,这些接触过患者的人士,未出现猴痘病毒症状。至于其他风险较低的接触者,卫生部也仍每天进行两次联系,以监测他们的健康状况。 传染病中心执行总监Leo Yee Sin告诉《亚洲新闻台》,猴痘在新加坡社群中传播的风险较低。 迄今为止,没有证据表明仅通过人际间传播可使猴痘在人群中持续存在下去。…