Wednesday, 27 September 2023

We are shifting our daily news to Gutzy.Asia Support us there!

Revisiting questions on AIM?

CommentariesLetters
By Terry Xu
0

By Leong Sze Hian

As Parliament shall be debating the AIM Review Report immediately following the Ministerial Statement on the same subject on Monday, 13 May – it may be good to re-visit some of the possible issues or questions:

MPs are trustees?

Under the Town Councils Act, MPs are trustees. Therefore, they are not permitted to do what they like with money or properties under their charge.

Can’t do whatever they like with property acquired?

If money (town councils’ money is the residents’ money) is used to acquire property on behalf of a town council, can a town council do whatever they want with property so acquired?

In this connection, we still don’t know how much money was spent developing the software?

Town councillors are deemed as public servants?

Under the Penal Code, all town councillors are deemed to be public servants. Town councillors are trustees of public funds and property.

They have no business to sell anything to AIM. It is immaterial and irrelevant to say that they did it in good faith or that they did not gain any benefit.

Hence, was the sale of the computer software to AIM appropriate?

Was and how was approval obtained?

Was prior approval obtained (from whom (all town councillors) and through what process?) to sell the computer software?

Author of Review reports to MND Minister/Chairman of PAP?

On the matter of the Review conducted by MND, who is the author of this Review? (The report was signed off as MND Town Council Review Team)

Is the author’s superior the National Development Minister, who is also the Chairman of the PAP? Is there not an inherent conflict of interest or possible bias?

Was there any vote taken?

When the 15 PAP town councils decided to sell the software to AIM, was a vote taken? And if so, by whom – all the MPs and town councillors?

Conflict of interest?

Did the PAP MPs declare their interest in this sale, especially when it was a sale to a PAP-owned AIM?

The PAP MPs should have abstained from voting for the sale, given the conflict of interest or non-declaration of interest (if it was not declared prior to the vote (if any)).

 

Latest posts

Election surprises and certainties: Dissecting Tharman’s presidential win

Terry Xu - 47
In the 2023 Presidential Election, Mr. Tharman Shanmugaratnam secured a stunning 70.4% landslide victory, surprising many, including himself. Despite expectations that TKL would win the opposition votes, voters from both camps showed a preference for Tharman's charisma and perceived competency. As Singapore reflects on the outcome, questions arise about the election's fairness and the real implications of Tharman's dominant win.

Volunteer as a Polling and Counting Agent for Singapore’s 2023 Presidential Election

The Online Citizen - 3
For the upcoming Singapore Presidential Election on 1st September, members of the civil society have spearheaded an initiative to strengthen our democratic fabric. We invite committed individuals to join us as Polling and Counting Agents, standing together for a transparent, fair, and just election. This vote counting exercise, organized by members of civil society, is not specifically in support of Mr Tan Kin Lian, a candidate in the upcoming Presidential Election. It's an exercise in active citizenry. Nonetheless, Mr Tan endorses this initiative, which hinges on his candidacy, championing transparency, and has given permission for the results to be shared publicly.

Reflections from the Centenary: The Legacy of LKY and Singapore’s Future

Op-Ed Contributor - 19
Gilbert Goh reflects on the LKY centenary event: an inspiring showcase of a leader's global legacy juxtaposed against current challenges, urging Singapore to continue its path of progress.

Lim Tean advocates for Tan Kin Lian: A visionary leader for Singapore’s Presidency

The Online Citizen - 84
In his speech at Mr Tan Kin Lian's launch of his presidential bid, Mr Lim Tean passionately championed the need for a truly Independent President. Highlighting Mr Tan Kin Lian's unique credentials and genuine concern for the wellbeing of Singaporeans, the Peoples Voice leader emphasized the pressing challenges of rising living costs and job insecurities faced by the public. Mr Lim depicted Mr Tan Kin Lian as a beacon of hope for the nation, advocating for a leader who genuinely understands and represents the people’s aspirations.

Tan Jee Say endorses Tan Kin Lian for President: A courageous, genuine, and humble...

The Online Citizen - 38
In advocating for a truly representative leader, Tan Jee Say underscored Tan Kin Lian's humility, courage, and genuine dedication. Highlighting the pressing need for restored public trust and effective independence, Tan Jee Say emphasized that Tan Kin Lian, as the 'People's President', would bring back hope to Singaporeans and champion true democracy

Tan Kin Lian’s pledge: Rekindling unity and charting a vigorous future for Singapore

The Online Citizen - 17
In the press conference to announce his bid for the Singapore presidency, Tan Kin Lian emphasizes safeguarding Singapore's reserves and strengthening public service integrity. Drawing on his 30-year leadership at NTUC Income, he envisions a future with affordable living, accessible housing, and job stability, pledging collaboration with the government for a united nation.

Strengthening Singapore’s political foundations: A call to action by Leong Mun Wai on Singapore’s...

The Online Citizen - 35
Leong Mun Wai urges Singaporeans to strengthen political checks and balances, emphasizing, 'The best is yet to be for Singapore if we dare to make the right decision in upcoming elections.

Trending posts

© © The Online Citizen Asia 2006 - 2023