Submitted by Pwee Foundation for the talk held by the foundation on 20th April 2013

[divide]

Last Saturday morning, the Pwee Foundation held one of its monthly in-house talks, titled ‘The Social Concern of Dr Goh Keng Swee, the civil servant and politician’.

Pwee foundation talk
The talk was by four guest speakers: Dr Goh’s daughter-in-law and biographer Ms Tan Siok Sun, former PAP cabinet minister for community development Dr Seet Ai Mee, NUS Social Work don Prof Ann Wee, and former Chief Minister David Marshall’s wife and former social worker Mrs Jean Marshall.

The closed-door, by-invitation-only, no-media event was attended by 40 people, consisting of finance and legal professionals, senior civil servants, heads of social services and social enterprises, architects and builders, and businessmen, all leaders in their own fields.

Ms Tan shared several photos and anecdotes highlighting key aspects of Dr Goh’s life: his childhood, his stint in the civil service, his time studying in London, and his entry into politics.

“Dr Goh came from a staunch Methodist background,” she said. “His uncle was a pastor. His father translated hymns into Malay.” She said this background influenced his later life, as he was committed to improving the lives of the common Singaporeans.

During his time as a tax collector in the War Tax Department, Ms Tan said, “He was a bad tax collector. His boss didn’t like him,” to much laughter. Later, after joining the Social Welfare Department, Dr Goh helped to set up ‘People’s Restaurants’, which were canteens where people could buy cheap meals during the working day.

“He was always involved in social work,” she added.

“He could have been an academic or stayed in the civil service,” Ms Tan said. “But he really cared for the people. As a politician, he made a difference.” Ms Tan showed a photo of Dr Goh in a Meet-the-People’s session: “These were the days when the people and the ministers were one. The ministers solved the people’s problems. He believed in using his brains for the betterment of the people.”

Dr Seet shared that Dr Goh was very frugal and counted every penny. Once, while head of the Food Standards Board, she learned how to make yoghurt, because he did not want to buy a yoghurt-making machine, which cost several hundred dollars.

Mrs Marshall shared that “Dr Goh and David [Marshall] showed an awareness of non-achievers in society. Dr Goh developed technical education for people who were valuable citizens, people who have potential for contributing to society.”

Prof Wee shared how, when a visiting guest commented on the increase in the number of motorcars in Singapore as an indicator of economic growth, Dr Goh had replied that he cared more about the increase in the number of motorcycles than motorcars, because motorcycles reflected the levelling-up of the common masses.

These personal stories led to a discussion by the audience of how Dr Goh would have responded to present-day challenges. They asked questions ranging from whether Dr Goh would have approved of the Integrated Resort or the latest workfare schemes, to the role of the private sector in helping the social sector, to the increase in social enterprises and social entrepreneurs.

When describing the present state of affairs in Singapore, a participant said, “In the last 10 to 15 years, the income growth of the lowest income segment experienced negative growth.” One participant from the social impact investing sector added “People have lost their connection. People [like Dr Goh] who came from humble beginnings knew what it was like being poor, and were connected to the ground. We need to think about how to incentivize people without inspiration to deploy resources to help people.”

An architect involved with ground-up initiatives, said, “People build to demand. We need to change what people want, to teach and educate them about responsible design and living sustainably. Then people will demand different things of their built environment.”

The discussion closed with comments from various speakers. Ms Tan provided the last word, about what Dr Goh her father-in-law said to her son: “It doesn’t matter what job you are doing. Give your employer your best, your employer will see value in you, and you will be of value to society. That’s all that matters.”

This talk and forum provided an opportunity for various stakeholders to meet and network, and to be inspired anew by our founding forefathers’ vision of Singapore. The Pwee Foundation has more talks scheduled over the following months, and hopes to bring together more people to discuss and discover better and more innovative ways to face Singapore’s unmet social needs.

You May Also Like

Death penalty will make Singapore an “outlier nation”: Human Rights Watch

Singapore’s execution of Mohammad bin Kadar on April 17, 2015, should be…

尚达曼呼声七年后 金管局还得再提醒需打造国人雇员核心

在前日(8月12日)的一项演说,金融管理局市场与金融发展副局长罗惠燕呼吁金融机构,应遵循人力部的公平考量框架(Fair Consideration Framework),积极栽培有潜质的新加坡籍员工担任领导职务。 根据《海峡时报》报导,罗惠燕称我国仍会欢迎全球各地专才和保持开放。惟,雇主也应以负责任的态度,积极培养本地人才。 然而,事实上,早在2013年,时任副总理和金管局主席尚达曼,就曾强调国人在金融企业内的行政财政和贸易领域争取最佳职务,至关重要。 与此同时,金管局、人力部和积极与新加坡的银行业界商讨,打造“新加坡核心”,更重要的是,这个核心不只是人数尚待象征。 “这还必须包括积极的职涯发展,确保国人在银行中有增长的领域有代表。确保在银行不同职能区域,国人都有大量的机遇。” 更早与2013年,民间实则已发出对金融领域外籍人士的人数表达担忧。自2005年新印经济合作协定(CECA)就有这种趋势。 遗憾的是,尚达曼的呼声过了七年,金管局仍不得不再次对银行业界作出喊话,确保业者打造“新加坡核心团队”。至于人力部在本月初揭发,多达30个金融、专业服务行业的雇主,聘请的外籍PMET大部分来自同一国家,事件仍令人印象深刻。 只不过数家银行在金管局的呼吁后,马上站出来表示,他们有强大的本地人核心雇员团队,也有培育本地人才的渠道。

Income up 0.3%: Everyone got govt benefits?

by Leong Sze Hian I refer to the Key Household Income Trends…

马废除消费税法案国会一读 9月务必落实销售税

马国政府于7月31日,在国会提呈三项税收法案,其中包括废除消费税法案、2018销售税法案和2018年服务税法案,并已经过一读程序。 上述法案是由副财政部长阿米鲁丁在下议院提呈,2018消费税(废除)法案,预计将在8月7日进入国会二读。 财长林冠英则呼吁反对党尊敬人民选择,不要尝试破坏联邦政府推动销售与服务税(SST),如果无法在9月1日开始落实销售税,就使政府陷入财务危机。 九月不落实  恐陷财务危机 “我们需要给人民和外资信心,确保我国政府财务运作顺畅。我们即便不满一马公司欠下的债务,但仍要偿还,因为这是政府承诺,如果跳票,会影响政府声誉和国际信用。” 他认为,要确保马国财务需要有盈余,销售税将成为收入保障。 假设9月仍未征收销售税,马国每个月将损失高达17亿5千万令吉的税收。 马国宣布在今年6月1日全国消费税调为0巴仙,而废除6巴仙消费税(GST)、重启销售与服务税(Sales tax & services…