Submitted by Pwee Foundation for the talk held by the foundation on 20th April 2013

[divide]

Last Saturday morning, the Pwee Foundation held one of its monthly in-house talks, titled ‘The Social Concern of Dr Goh Keng Swee, the civil servant and politician’.

Pwee foundation talk
The talk was by four guest speakers: Dr Goh’s daughter-in-law and biographer Ms Tan Siok Sun, former PAP cabinet minister for community development Dr Seet Ai Mee, NUS Social Work don Prof Ann Wee, and former Chief Minister David Marshall’s wife and former social worker Mrs Jean Marshall.

The closed-door, by-invitation-only, no-media event was attended by 40 people, consisting of finance and legal professionals, senior civil servants, heads of social services and social enterprises, architects and builders, and businessmen, all leaders in their own fields.

Ms Tan shared several photos and anecdotes highlighting key aspects of Dr Goh’s life: his childhood, his stint in the civil service, his time studying in London, and his entry into politics.

“Dr Goh came from a staunch Methodist background,” she said. “His uncle was a pastor. His father translated hymns into Malay.” She said this background influenced his later life, as he was committed to improving the lives of the common Singaporeans.

During his time as a tax collector in the War Tax Department, Ms Tan said, “He was a bad tax collector. His boss didn’t like him,” to much laughter. Later, after joining the Social Welfare Department, Dr Goh helped to set up ‘People’s Restaurants’, which were canteens where people could buy cheap meals during the working day.

“He was always involved in social work,” she added.

“He could have been an academic or stayed in the civil service,” Ms Tan said. “But he really cared for the people. As a politician, he made a difference.” Ms Tan showed a photo of Dr Goh in a Meet-the-People’s session: “These were the days when the people and the ministers were one. The ministers solved the people’s problems. He believed in using his brains for the betterment of the people.”

Dr Seet shared that Dr Goh was very frugal and counted every penny. Once, while head of the Food Standards Board, she learned how to make yoghurt, because he did not want to buy a yoghurt-making machine, which cost several hundred dollars.

Mrs Marshall shared that “Dr Goh and David [Marshall] showed an awareness of non-achievers in society. Dr Goh developed technical education for people who were valuable citizens, people who have potential for contributing to society.”

Prof Wee shared how, when a visiting guest commented on the increase in the number of motorcars in Singapore as an indicator of economic growth, Dr Goh had replied that he cared more about the increase in the number of motorcycles than motorcars, because motorcycles reflected the levelling-up of the common masses.

These personal stories led to a discussion by the audience of how Dr Goh would have responded to present-day challenges. They asked questions ranging from whether Dr Goh would have approved of the Integrated Resort or the latest workfare schemes, to the role of the private sector in helping the social sector, to the increase in social enterprises and social entrepreneurs.

When describing the present state of affairs in Singapore, a participant said, “In the last 10 to 15 years, the income growth of the lowest income segment experienced negative growth.” One participant from the social impact investing sector added “People have lost their connection. People [like Dr Goh] who came from humble beginnings knew what it was like being poor, and were connected to the ground. We need to think about how to incentivize people without inspiration to deploy resources to help people.”

An architect involved with ground-up initiatives, said, “People build to demand. We need to change what people want, to teach and educate them about responsible design and living sustainably. Then people will demand different things of their built environment.”

The discussion closed with comments from various speakers. Ms Tan provided the last word, about what Dr Goh her father-in-law said to her son: “It doesn’t matter what job you are doing. Give your employer your best, your employer will see value in you, and you will be of value to society. That’s all that matters.”

This talk and forum provided an opportunity for various stakeholders to meet and network, and to be inspired anew by our founding forefathers’ vision of Singapore. The Pwee Foundation has more talks scheduled over the following months, and hopes to bring together more people to discuss and discover better and more innovative ways to face Singapore’s unmet social needs.

You May Also Like

两批人马深夜路上群殴 警接投报调查

两批人马深夜公然在马路上群殴,有人甚至亮出刀子,已经引起警方注意,着手调查。 殴斗事件是自上周末(10月19日)晚上在脸书多个新加坡群组以及优管上传开,短短45秒的视频中,可见两批个别穿上黑上衣及白上衣蓝裤子的男女们在马路上互相追逐。 两方人马互相叫嚣,且扭打成团,一名白衣男子在看到同伴被推倒在地时,手持一柄类似长刀的长形金属物就挥向另一个身着黑衣的男子,而视频中也不时听到有女子的喊声。视频后半段也可见两方人马都被拉开,似乎进行劝解。 帖文上也注明有关事件发生在丹戎巴葛的路上。 据《今日报》报导,群殴事件的起因、受伤人数等都未有详情,惟警方表示已经接获相关事件的投报,并且已经展开调查。 网民都纷纷感叹世风日下,并指出先下年轻人真的很大胆,但是被逮捕后就“哭爹喊娘”的。 有者也猜测他们的国籍,有网友指视频中的人群说话声不似本地人,猜他们都是外国人士。

NEA issues clarification on the mysterious Vice-President of Association for the Recycling of Second Hand Goods

National Environment Agency (NEA) issues clarification on the mysterious  Vice-President of the Association…

University admissions, employment and help for the poor

Leong Sze Hian questions the inconsistencies in some govt statistics.

没攻击毕丹星人格 尚穆根指陈有明文章“认真、有想法”

上周五(19日),贸工部兼外交部高级政务次长陈有明医生,在人民行动党官网发文,非议工人党秘书长毕丹星声援亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at),也翻旧账指亚菲言并非爱国的“友爱批评者”( loving critics),过去曾袒护马来西亚和马哈迪。 然而此举却遭网民挞伐,有网民指陈有明有临近选举“搏出位”之嫌,再者,也列举选举局守则,候选人在选举中应负责任和庄严,避免以仇恨或诋毁对手的方式竞选。 行动党成员遭网民挞伐,内政暨律政部长尚穆根则选择为之辩护,指陈有明提出的文章是“认真、有想法”的。 他也解释,亚菲言曾主张新马合并;当马国船只闯入争议水域时,亚菲言指新加坡是极端爱国主义的,也“站在马国立场”。 尚穆根称这是自由国度,亚菲言有权表达自己的看法,但毕丹星作为反对党领袖,若要在国会声援亚菲言,指后者是“友爱的批判者”,那么在健全民主制度下,他们有权质问,毕丹星究竟站在哪一边? 他也指在刘程强领导下的工人党,即便持有不同意见,但政治止于国门,不会站在其他国家立场对付新加坡。 “这不是在攻击毕丹星人格,而是合理的提问。”