By Terry Xu

chopefood
Screen grab of the CHOPE FOOD for the NEEDY fanpage

The story which inspired the suspended coffee movement started off in a travel blog, Accidental Tourist , the suspended coffee movement has gained popularity after a reemergence from sharing of the story via social media. This suspended coffee movement has made its way to Singapore in another form. A page named “CHOPE FOOD for the NEEDY – ‘Suspended Food Revolution’ to Pay It Forward” has localized this concept into a suspended food movement, to pay for food that stall owners can give to the needy based on their discretion.

In various interviews with the mainstream media, the page owner is revealed to be a Singaporean named Michelle Tan, who said that instead of paying $5 dollars for a latte, you pay for food that the hawker can give to the needy.

Despite just having started off two days ago on Tuesday, it has its fans swelled up to well over four thousands and still on the march to grow even larger.

In the posting at the fanpage, it explains how to go about joining in the movement.

Go to your favourite hawker & other like-minded, kind hawkers to PRE-PAY for eg. 1, 5 or 10 packets of food. Ask them to give this food out to needy folk whenever they see them.

Sounds simple? Yes it probably is, but the first step to approach hawkers for pre-pay food seems pretty awkward for some interested individuals. Which is why the page has come up with an explanatory post for the uninitiated.

chopefood

Referring to the suggestions that stickers could be given so as to identify which are the participating stalls for the needy, Michelle explains that this is something which the movement seek to avoid.

“We have asked the hawker to make the judgement call as to who he will give out the food to. For this to work, he must do it under the radar. No one should be coming to him specifically. “

Because in the worst scenario of this movement, there will be people who make use of the goodwill and badgered the hawker for free food. Depriving those who are really in need of the food paid by others out of good will.

“The beauty of this system is there is in effect no need to get awareness out to the needy. We are harnessing the supply side of things, not the demand side – We are delegating the part of finding needy people to the hawkers who will have an idea of who’s needy in their area.” Said Michelle in one of the posting.

Some have also been cynical over the movement expressing that this is a scheme that would benefit hawkers from the advance payment. But as the owner of the page states, people joining in the movement should not pre-pay food to hawkers whom the person do not trust.

True enough that such a goodwill movement acts on good faith. Whether or not such a movement would gain further momentum or sizzle into thin air would depend on the joint actions of the three parties, the payer, the hawker and those who receive the food. Though there are bound to be people who seek to abuse good will but here is hoping that such an initiative can grow to a movement which every Singaporean can be proud of.

[spacer style=”1″ icon=”none”]

Michelle Tan in her own words,

How should I broach this with the hawker?

Sample conversation:
Hi, Uncle. Can I order food in advance?
(Hand over the cash.)
My friends and I have decided to go to our favourite food-stalls and order food. Then if you see any poor people …those who cannot afford a proper meal … in the market or anywhere… you can give the food to them.
It is called “CHOPE FOOD for the Needy”.

(Go back the next week to see how things went. Repeat.)

Some people seem hesitant, worrying that it is hard to explain the concept to the hawkers. Don’t worry. It’s easy. They get it. The hawkers are close to the ground. They are in the area day in, day out and many have been there for decades. My bet is that all of them could reel off the names of 5 needy people from the area the moment you asked them to.

How will the needy know which stalls to approach?

The needy are not intended to approach any stalls – the hawkers are meant to make the judgment call on who are the needy and go forward to offer the meals to them. We are harnessing the supply side of things, not the demand side of things.

Database of stalls / Identifying Stickers – yea or nay

While there have been many calls for a database of, & stickers on, ‘participating stores’, I fear that this could lead to the stalls being badgered for free meals (whether by deserving folk or not-so-genuine people).
Stickers are a no-no. This is a “by the people for the people”, “it takes a village” initiative. It would detract from the simplicity and low-cost ‘kampung’ community spirit of the movement to institutionalise it. My gut-feel is that people are inspired by this movement precisely because it is in their hands – they get to task a hawker of their choice (someone they are comfortable with) to carry out the good deed.

Doubters/Haters

Cynical comments have popped up, as one might expect, asking “How do you know for sure that the hawkers will follow through?” “They might find that this is a way to just line their own pockets.” “Too naive to believe that everyone is trustworthy”.

** This movement hinges on the belief that there are good people out there.

Personally, if someone gave me $10 to give out packets of my food to feed poor old ladies, I would never pocket the money. My bet is that 99% or even 100% of the hawkers would not pocket the money either. **

At the end of the day, it is sad & a bit demoralising to see the haters’ comments – they have such a jaundiced view of the world, and I worry that they will colour the view of the many kind-hearted & optimistic people who have joined in. So, I say, “Cynics begone from this page. This movement is based on good faith, trust & a belief in the good in others. Cynics trying to tear the movement down have no place here.”

Ultimately, my view is this: If what I do allows even ONE person to be fed, who would otherwise have gone hungry, then it has been worth it.

Singapore

Singaporeans are always given such a hard time for being ‘selfish’, ‘robotic’ and ‘heartless’. I find that there is a lot of kindness in people all around us in Singapore. Singaporeans look very standoffish but when you need help, strangers will usually come to your aid.
** I think that people in Singapore are actually very kind, they just don’t often get the chance to show it. This gives them that chance. **

Why start this?

Who hasn’t ever been down and out and needed help of some kind? When I was down and out, I was grateful to be able to rely on the help of my aunts, mum & brother. Everyone can do with a helping hand every now and then. This way, we help people who have no one else to help them.

My parents are some of the most generous people I know. Growing up with their example, helping strangers or the needy just becomes a natural thing to do.

**This movement would fulfil a basic human need for food, and I think it is wonderful to be able to feed someone a good meal; who cares if you never meet the person and you never get any thanks for it. That’s what Paying It Forward is all about. Hoping that the good deeds you do without any return, will inspire others to do wonderful things too. **

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Pest control specialists to tackle rat infestation at Bukit Batok

[youtube id=”4QtJMDPGWkA” align=”center” mode=”normal”] Pest control specialists turned up at the hill…

菲律宾联邦银行与狮城华侨银行联手 打造首个区块链跨境汇款

菲律宾联邦银行(Union Bank)近日联合新加坡华侨银行(OCBC),使用Adhara 流动资金管理与国际支付平台,打造区块链跨境汇款( blockchain-based remittance)。 区块链跨境汇款指将一般需2-3天的跨境汇款缩短至数秒内完成汇款。 6月27日,菲律宾联邦银行试行使用区块链的法定代币化,成功从华侨银行汇款,到位于菲律宾偏乡Surigao Del Sur的农村银行加提蓝银行(Cantilan Bank)。 上述汇款结合Adhara 平台与UnionBank-UBX’s…

尚穆根称前进党对义顺“三心二意” 梁文辉斥应专注改善义顺居民生活

昨日,行动党义顺集选区候选人尚穆根,指前进党原本有意义顺集选区让给别的政党,显得“没有诚意”(half-hearted)对此前进党助理秘书长梁文辉反驳前进党一直致力服务义顺,驳斥尚穆根的说法。 在今日(1日)的线上记者会,原律政兼内政部长尚穆根,指前进党似乎对于攻打义顺“三心两意”,而上周还曾与其他政党协调对换其他选区。 “我不想猜测为什么前进党会来,但他们似乎在三心二意,一周前还提出用义顺和一些选区交换。” 前进党候选人毕博渊随后作出回应,指对方显然惧怕竞争对手,因此试图以“障眼法”误导选民。 毕博渊也强调,前进党团队在选区划分检讨委会报告出炉后,就一直在义顺筹备,且根据阻断措施下的规则备战,但却没人愿意提起此事。 梁文辉也回应,各在野党都有意角逐优先的席位,因此在商榷过程,会有各种想法概念抛出,但这并不意味着所有的想法都被接纳,或成为谈判基础。 他续指,前进党在义顺的团队,数个月来不停在筹备,而且应该将焦点放在改善义顺居民的生活。

巴西古当复课后130师生身体不适 逾百人团队赴85校检测

马来西亚柔佛州巴西古当今年上半年饱受空气污染事件影响,逾百人团队分批到巴西古当13公里范围内的85间热点学校展开空气素质监控工作,以便确定空气中的有害气体和寻找空气污染源头。 自上周被宣布停课后,当地475所教育机构,包括111所学校已于昨日复课,岂料在复课四小时后就传出有师生出现不适症状,情况严重者甚至召来救伤车送医。 能源、工艺、科学、气候变化与环境部长杨美盈指出,逾百人团队由多个单位组成,他们将在85间学校检测空气指数至今日下午1时。随后,他们将使用空气素质探测器和气体分析仪,进行检测。 她强调,数天前的空气测量数据成绩仍处于安全水平,却不知为何学校复课后又传出师生不适事件,因此在今日展开空气检测工作。 她指出,当局已经对七名住院的病患进行血液和尿液检验,将会在进行数据对比和分析后,才对外公布结果。 她于今早在巴西古当市议会大厦媒体室召开新闻发布会时透露,昨日学校复课后,共有10人因感到不适而送院治疗,而至今早9时都未出现新病例。陪同出席者包括柔佛州卫生、文化与遗产行政议员莫哈末库赞,还有巴西古当市议会主席在诺。 杨美盈将会面工厂业主 杨美盈表示,她今午将与本地区内的工厂业主会面,商讨在确保工业区可持续性发展可取得平衡的前提下,应对空污问题的合作方式。 她也指出,此次空污事件与金金河污染不同,因为受影响的范围太广,受影响学生都来自不同学校,因此可以相信与地域性没有关联。 昨日复课后四小时又爆发师生身体不适情况,约130名来自15所学校的师生出现晕眩和作呕症状,而且他们主要都是在校舍高层楼上课的学生。 受影响师生皆在高楼层上课 库赞昨日在事件发生后,巡视巴西古当哥柏国小时指出,共有15所学校约130名师生出现不适症状,但是基于每所学校的情况和受影响人数有所不同,因此他无法提供正确数字。…