By Dr Wee Teck Young, M.B.B.S. ( S’pore ), MMed Family Medicine ( S’pore)

It’s hard for me, an ordinary citizen of Singapore, a medical doctor engaged in social enterprise work in Afghanistan and a human being wishing for a better world, to write this from Kabul.

But people are dying.

And children and women are feeling hopeless.

“What’s the point in telling you our stories?” asked Freba, one of the seamstresses working with the Afghan Peace Volunteers to set up a tailoring co-operative for Afghan women. “Does anyone hear? Does anyone believe us?”

Silently within, I answered Freba with shame,” You’re right. No one is listening.”

So, I write this in protest against my government’s presence in the humanitarian and war tragedy of Afghanistan, as a way to lend my voice to Freba and all my Afghan friends.

I do so in dissent, against the global security of imprisoned minds.

I thought, “If no one listens as humans should, we should at least speak like free men and women.”

Singapore’s complicity in the humanitarian and war tragedy of Afghanistan

It is clear that the Taliban, the many Afghan and regional warlords, militia groups and the Afghan government are responsible for the current humanitarian and war tragedy of Afghanistan.

But Singapore is also responsible because it is one of the fifty U.S. /NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organization) coalition countries working with the corrupt Afghan government ( rated the most corrupt country in 2012 ).

Singapore has inadvertently become a minor accomplice of the self-interests of the U.S. government in Afghanistan ; The U.S. Vice President , Joe Biden, spoke at the Munich Security Conference recently, “The United States is a Pacific power. And the world’s greatest military alliance ( NATO ) helps make us an Atlantic power as well. As our new defense strategy makes clear, we will remain both a Pacific power and an Atlantic power.”

American power and economic interests naturally do not include the best interests of ordinary Singaporeans or Afghans.

The Afghan humanitarian tragedy

In the normal, logical world, it should inspire the doubt and curiosity of Singaporeans that while the U.S. /NATO coalition was spending billions of dollars every week on the Afghan war ( the U.S. alone was spending two billion dollars every week ), Afghans have been perishing under one of the highest infant and maternal mortality rates in the world. At least 36% live below the poverty line and 35% of Afghan men do not have work . The UN calls the acute malnutrition of nearly one million children in the Afghan south ‘shocking’ . Almost three quarters of all Afghans do not have access to safe drinking water .

On several occasions in the past few years, Afghanistan was declared the worst country for children and women, and yet, many of us still hold this warped presumption, “Afghanistan is the worst country for children and women but whatever we are doing over there MUST somehow be right!”

The Afghan war tragedy

In the normal, logical world, it should at least matter to ‘result-orientated’ Singaporeans that the very expensive Afghan/U.S. coalition’s ‘war against terrorism’ has increased rather than decreased ‘terrorism’, with the Global Terrorism Index reporting that terrorist strikes in the region have increased four times since the start of the Iraq war in 2003.

Even President Karzai said in the UK recently that the security situation in southern Helmand province of Afghanistan was better before British troops were deployed.

Adding to this cynical mess of increased ‘terrorism’ at the hands of global superpowers, the U.S. has established an epicenter of drone warfare in Afghanistan, with Afghans and Pakistanis and other ‘insurgents’ as their ‘targets’, and Singapore as one of their many allies. Singapore has had teams helping in drone reconnaissance operations, reconnaissance that may have eventually ended up with a U.S. /NATO decision to kill someone without trial.

I had raised this personal concern once in a meeting room at Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs ; I was appreciative of the attentiveness given to this issue, but sensed that there was no great interest in ‘investigating’ how Singapore’s co-operation in the drone operations in Afghanistan may be violating international law, as was suggested by the ex-UN Special Rapporteur on Extra Judicial, Summary or Arbitrary Killings, Mr Philip Alston.

A recent New York Times article highlights these ‘fears  for U.S. allies’, reporting on a lawsuit in the British courts that ‘accuses British officials of becoming “secondary parties to murder” by passing intelligence to American officials that was later used in drone strikes.’ My life has been changed by listening to Afghan friends like Raz Mohammad tell how ‘drones bury beautiful lives’.

Raz Mohammad, Abdulhai and I in Kabul, Afghanistan
Raz Mohammad, Abdulhai and I in Kabul, Afghanistan

The U.N. is finally living up to its charter to ‘remove the scourge of war’ by duly investigating  drone warfare. Major U.S. newspapers are also asking for more transparency over Obama’s weekly, premeditated ‘kill lists’. There has been concern over unchecked Powers getting even more out of all jurisdictions with the appointment of ‘drone justifier’ John Brennan as Obama’s CIA Director nominee.

Even the UN Committee on the Rights of a Child has been “alarmed” at reports of the deaths of hundreds of children from US attacks and air strikes in Afghanistan since the committee last reviewed U.S. practices in 2008.

Singapore should be alarmed too.

Singapore’s own identity as a militarized, authoritarian country

Deep within, like most human beings, Freba yearns for a decent livelihood without war. Abdulhai and the Afghan Peace Volunteers wish for friends from all 195 countries of the world, a better world without borders!

What kind of identity do Singaporeans wish for their country, a peaceful and friendly country or otherwise?

Again, I’m concerned. We like pictures of be-medaled soldiers more than unsung ‘Mother Teresa’ heroines. Our government has a significant number of ex-military commanders.

According to the Global Militarisation Index released by the Bonn International Centre for Conversion (BICC), Singapore has been the second most militarized nation in the world for years. The latest ranking puts Singapore just second to Israel and one brutal position more militarized than Syria.

What also worries me is that this militarized mindset may be behind Singapore’s enthusiasm in the drone show-business, and in ‘unintentionally’ being part of the U.S.’ ‘Asia pivot’ by hosting four U.S. littoral combat ships.

Even on the economic front, while Singapore has one of the higher Gini coefficients of income inequality in the world, not many people in Singapore are aware of or debating Singapore’s participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership , again a partnership that corporate America is pushing for.

What Singapore has aligned herself with in Afghanistan is militarized authoritarianism that concentrates profit and power in the hands of a few. While this follows global norms, such a system works mainly for the wealth and power of the 1% in the short term, but not for the daily needs of the 99% in either the short or long term.

I personally think that both the democratic and socialist practices of today are ‘non-progressive’ vehicles for the rule of the few ‘Kings, Emperors, Presidents, and Prime Ministers’ over the many presumably ‘ignorant, helpless and sometimes lazy’ subjects. These elitist systems tend to maintain control by ‘pacifying the masses’ through formal education, mainstream media and force.

I hope Singapore can steer itself away from this ‘norm’, an ugly ‘norm’ in which war becomes fun, like when Prince Harry described his combat pilot job in Afghanistan as “a joy … because I’m one of those people who loves playing PlayStation and Xbox, so with my thumbs I like to think I’m probably quite useful.”

I believe that for effective defense and genuine security, we ought to be friends with neighbours and all peoples of other lands rather than militarists with superior weapons.

Perhaps these are differences in opinions which can be included in Our Singapore Conversation.

It’s hard for me to write this, but I am sincerely ashamed to be a citizen of the 2nd most militarized nation on earth, a country that has participated in the legally-questionable drone warfare in Afghanistan.

Thankfully, I have hope in Singaporeans like I have hope in humanity. There are alternatives. The world is awakening, the human race is revolutionizing, and so is Singapore’s electorate. Most ordinary folk in the world don’t want to send missiles or guns to kill strangers in other places! Human beings have always preferred otherwise.

My voice is not political. My voice is human.

Afghans are hurting very badly.

And I am hurting too.

 

You May Also Like

Protecting consumers

Tan Kin Lian suggests safeguards for consumers.

涉雇佣歧视雇主被惩处 近六成涉国籍歧视

教育部兼人力部政务部长颜晓芳坦言,过去三年平均每年有50位雇主,因为雇佣歧视而导致工作准证特权被吊销。 颜晓芳补充,其中有六成个案涉及国籍歧视,另有三分之一涉及性别和年龄歧视。其余个案也涉及种族、婚姻状况和家庭负担的职场雇佣歧视。不过过去三年,则未有重犯错误的雇主。 工人党阿裕尼集选区议员贝理安,是在今日(4日)在国会提问,涉及职场歧视个案的类别。 颜晓芳也坦言,人力部也发现在2014年至2018年期间,本地求职者反映求职过程感到被歧视的比例也有所增加。她称,人力部仍会定期检讨和进行民调,以掌握民间对雇佣歧视的观点。 劳资政公平与良好雇佣联盟(TAFEP)每年平均受理多达400宗涉及雇佣歧视投诉。 颜晓芳称,人力部严正看待职场歧视问题,针对贝理安的提问也表示,政府考虑定期公布数据,以协助形塑民意,并且敦促雇主趋向更公平的雇佣行为。 此外,人力部平均每年针对犯较轻微疏失,警告40位雇主,例如他们在人力资源操守上出现疏失,导致在招聘过程时沟通不良或导致歧视。 “在这类个案,TAFEP都会介入并给予雇主如何改善的建议。” 他也提醒,那些因疏失而积分被扣的雇佣公司,也很可能被吊销执照;那些在公平雇佣准则上涉及造假的雇主,也会被对付。他指出人力部过去曾采取法律行动对付相关公司。 据人力部去年的雇佣标准报告,仅上半年,已约70名雇主涉及职场歧视行为,比2019年全年的人数高出了近一半。 数据的呈现基本上可以坐实了长久以来招聘歧视的问题,然而原本应加大力度管制和惩戒的歧视问题,却被商会驳斥,称强迫立法规范可能会导致工作场所的不良关系加剧僵化。

Four lifts at Waterway Cascadia in Punggol broke down for more than four hours

Lifts at the new Build-To-Order (BTO) flats at Waterway Cascadia which located in…

15国宣布明年越南签署RCEP协定 印度不参与

东盟昨日在声明中指出,区域全面经济伙伴关系协定(RCEP)的15个参与国,已完成谈判,并宣布预定明年2月在越南签署协定。 但15国中不包括印度,印度总理莫迪在曼谷举行的RCEP峰会上说,环顾七年来的RCEP谈判,包括全球经贸形势都在变化,这些变化是不能忽视的。他认为RCEP协定并未充分体现它的初衷,这种情况下印度不会加入。 根据法新社报导,印度对外事务部东亚区高级外交官维杰塔库星(Vijay Thakur Singh)对记者说:“我们已经向与会国传达了我们将不加入RCEP的决定。” 第三次区域全面经济伙伴协定(RCEP)领导人会议本月4日在曼谷举行。不过参与谈判的各国领导人仍表示大门仍为印度而开。 参与RCEP协定的15国包括东盟10国,另加中国、韩国、日本、澳洲和纽西兰。这项协定涵盖全球一半人口和30巴仙的全球生产总值(GDP)。 据分析,印度可能担忧RCEP将对该国制造业造成冲击,特别是中国廉价商品涌入;该国希望RCEP自贸程度低一些,给该国更多照顾。 要开放印度市场  相应领域也要对印度开放 印度总理莫迪本月2日,接受《曼谷邮报》采访时称,他仍致力于推动RCEP谈判,不过强调若要印度开放庞大市场,相应领域也要对印度开放,让印度商家从中受惠。 他指出印度很清楚,互利的RCEP较符合其国家以及所有伙伴利益。…