Media release from “The Happiness Revolution: Live Life Now”

A few months ago, Singapore made international news for being one of the most unhappy societies in the world. Given that we are also one of the most developed, do we really have that much cause for unhappiness?

Four youths from Nanyang Technological University don’t think so.

Happiness is not just an emotion; it is a choice. Research has consistently shown that happiness produces success, not the other way round.

The problem is, we Singaporeans are too caught up in our own rat race for good grades and a good job, thinking that we will be happy when we achieve all of these material goals. But the truth is, when we get there, we realize that the happiness is not as fulfilling as we thought it would be.

The four youths, Ms. Fiona Cher, Mr. Izzat Rusydi, Ms. Hong Shuqi and Mr. Lin Huanyu, have embarked on a movement to change the way happiness is perceived in Singapore. In the past three weeks, they have been visiting various schools to talk to students and get them to think about what makes them happy and doing the things that make them now.

After all, why postpone happiness?

Over 800 youths agree, and have since pledged to start doing the things that make them happy.

We may live in Singapore where meritocracy reigns, but there is more to life than just good grades and a good job. If we don’t make the choice to be happy now, then when?

Note: “The Happiness Revolution: Live Life Now” is a social movement that seeks to spread the message of happiness and does not earn from any of its activities. Those who wish to take part and join the revolution for a happier Singapore can visit their booth at Scape on 15th and 16th February to pledge and make a difference. You can also download your own Happiness Kit or find more information online at http://thehappinessrevolution.sg

You May Also Like

68-year-old Indonesian national dies from COVID-19, fourth death in Singapore

A 68-year-old Indonesian national who tested positive for COVID-19 has died due…

50岁情侣反锁家内扬言同归于尽 警破窗救援

一对50岁情侣在昨日(2日)将自己反锁在家内,并扬言要同归于尽,吓得邻居立即报警处理,而情侣双双在随后也被捕。 这对情侣将自己反锁在惹兰红山(Jalan Bukit Merah)第3组屋内,位于该组屋的第九层。 邻居指出,该名55岁男子与52岁女子已住在一起大约十年,男子无业,而女子则目前正就职清洁工。 案发当时男子正对着女子大吼,并扬言要挟同女子一同跳下楼。 而民防部队则向《新报》透露,大约晚间9点左右接获通报,于是便立即前往案发现场,并在底层放置缓冲气囊,阻止闹出人命。 随后等到灾难援助与救援队到来,并利用安全网从大楼到公寓的窗户击碎,再进入到屋内,对峙才得以停止。 警方发言人表示,该名男子涉嫌使用武力阻止公务员执行职务,而女子则涉嫌吸毒,目前双双已被逮捕,案件仍在侦办中。

Netizens aren’t buying DPM Heng’s opinion on information transparency during Covid-19 outbreak

As the people continue to panic amidst the Covid-19 outbreak, supplies like…

港新两者差异大,香港照抄狮城组屋计划意义不大

香港多年来身陷公屋严重短缺问题,近年来因地域、历史与经济方面条件相似,更向我国看齐,多次向我国的公共组屋(HDB)体制取经。 然而,香港大学客座教授邝健铭早前在南华早报发表文章表示,香港不能照抄新加坡的模式,因为狮城房屋能成功应付增长人口,绝不仅仅是增加土地空间那么简单。 他认为,新加坡之所能够成功建制组屋系统是更多是赖于新加坡于60-70年代时代的已故总理李光耀实行独立的主权国家,而香港则是中国的特别行政区。两者之间有诸多差异,故要强行照搬公共组屋模式,只会东施效颦。 而学者刘浩典教授与作者李欣(译音) 日前于南华早报发表文章,针对邝健铭教授的言论作出解释,认为大部分的新填海土地适用于建立机场、工业园、码头与休闲场所,仅小部分的土地是用于组屋计划。 刘浩典教授也是李光耀公共政策研究院前副院长,曾在新加坡公共领域服务,包括担任财政部财务政策主任。李欣则是新加坡国立大学李光耀公共政策学院博士生。 我国组屋政策始于50年代末,由已故总理李光耀于1959年到1990年推行的政策,当时因房屋短缺问题,而造成在市中心的棚屋区过度拥挤。据文章指出,约50万人面临住宿问题,而约40万人需从市中心搬出去。 当时英国政府设立了新加坡改良信托局(SIT)解决问题,但仅规划在32年内建立23万间组屋。而人民行动党当选执政后,将新加坡改良信托局改为建屋发展局(HDB),以建造公共廉价房屋,安顿人民。 以强权实施政策 文章也指出,表面上,我国与香港有众多相似之处,但组屋计划成功的背后,包含着香港无法想象的土地改革与财富再分配课题。 作者认为,纵观新加坡的自主权,一向奉行强政府,弱社会的制度,不管是增进社会福利或是推行一项政策模式,从生意市场到劳动市场、土地业权、地产发展商或任何涉及金融财政的领域皆有政府掌握控制,而人民接受政府说法,认为政策的推行将有利于他们的生活。 为有效达到改善,建屋发展局接管组屋系统的管理,从规划、设计、发展到定期维修,皆由该局一手包办。建屋发展局以提供城外更多廉价房屋为首要目标,自1960年起建立了逾50万套住房来解决住宿短缺问题,并超标完成。…