TOC Editorial –

The Population White Paper published by the National Population and Talent Division could have just focused on the biggest problem that Singapore is currently facing – that of excessive immigration and our over reliance on the foreign workforce – and proposed ways to tackle that situation.

Instead, what we had was an unnecessarily complex proposal that first projects an increase in our population to 6.9 million in 2030 without proper explanation, and then compounds the problem by suggesting a slew of measures to mitigate the expected negative consequences of such an increase.

The government’s approach in writing the White Paper seems to have been this:

  1. set a GDP growth target that it wants to achieve.
  2. see how much of that can come from productivity growth.
  3. calculate how much population growth is needed, to make up the rest of the growth.
  4. figure out how much more it is willing to do to increase Singapore’s Total Fertility Rate.
  5. calculate how many immigrants are needed, to make up the rest of the population growth.
  6. figure out what policies are needed by this increased population.

It ignores the most fundamental question, which is what The Online Citizen asks: who does this type of immigration-fuelled GDP growth benefit? Does it benefit ordinary Singaporeans, or does it benefit the richer and higher-income Singaporeans and foreigners?

The answer must be crystal-clear from the last few years, where we have seen impressively high GDP growth numbers coupled with minimal improvement, if not outright deterioration, in the lives of ordinary Singaporeans.

And yet, the Government continues to insist on walking down this path, a path that Singaporeans have already very clearly and loudly said – in our votes in the 2011 General Election and the recent Punggol East by-election — that we do not want to go down anymore. So much for the Prime Minister’s promise after GE2011, to “listen carefully to different voices, understand the day-to-day difficulties and strains facing Singaporeans, address their concerns and be open to inputs on what Government can do better”.

This government, led by the ruling People’s Action Party, has evidently not changed – it still thinks that its policies are right, and it is only the way in which such policies are communicated to us that is an issue.

Since GE2011, it has held many sessions of the National Conversation, yet it would appear that our views on population growth have not been taken seriously. Our cries for a slower pace of population growth remain unheard by our political leaders. We again face the same policies that cost PAP its massive loss in votes. What an absolute waste of effort in public consultation.

Are our accusations valid? Since the White Paper was launched, TOC has received many articles and links that criticises what the White Paper puts forward. Among the comments that poured in was the view that the PAP has reneged on its promise to listen more.

For the sake of Singapore and Singaporeans, this must stop.

TOC will monitor document and summarise the positions taken by our elected representatives during the Parliament debate on the White Paper, and the final vote cast by each Member of Parliament on whether to endorse it. We will publish a summary, and encourage our readers to use it to question the actions of their MPs and push for a complete review of our long-term population policy in line with what Singaporeans really want.

We believe that setting population policy to support a GDP growth target puts the cart before the horse. Instead, we should define our population policy based on what Singaporeans want and are comfortable with for Singapore, with a fully-informed understanding of what this might mean for our GDP growth.

The PAP is fond of talking about the need to make hard choices and trade-offs. We know that Singaporeans are very capable of doing this. But the PAP is not giving us a chance to make our own choices, instead of imposing their choices upon us.

TOC believes that Singaporeans can reclaim our aspirations for our country only by holding our political leaders accountable. They need to fulfil their post-GE2011 promises, and really start to listen to the people and what we want, instead of simply telling us what is really good for us.

We need to turn this White Paper into a Green Paper, where our political leaders consult honestly and openly with the people to understand the real problems and aspirations and find the right solutions. Otherwise, this Population White Paper will push Singapore further down a path that we already know we do not want.

You May Also Like

【武汉冠状病毒】3月16日本地增17起病例 增新加坡教会感染群

根据新加坡卫生部文告,截至本月16日中午12时,本地新增17起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,累计确诊243例,今日再有四人出院,使之出院人数达到109人。 这意味着目前仍有134人需留院治疗,大多情况稳定或有起色,但有13人需待在加护病房。 今日有11起病例都属入境病例,包括第 227、229、230、231、232、 233、238、239、 240、 241和第243例。 本地也出现新感染群,至少四起病例,与武吉知马的新加坡教会(Church of Singapore)有关联。 其中包括今早确诊的第235例是31岁女公民,是新加坡中央医院的医务社工。尽管未到过境外感染重灾区,但曾接触第208例(26岁女公民)。 早前的第214例(29岁男公民)以及第144例,都和上述感染群有关。 第144例是早前在7日确诊的58岁本地居家理发师,她也与裕廊SAFRA团拜晚宴感染群有关,曾接触第140例。…

Security bonds encourage “xenophobia and classism” – H.O.M.E

The Online Citizen speaks to Jolovan Wham, a social worker with H.O.M.E…

以宪法挑战刑事诽谤控状被驳回 迪哥达代表律师将提刑事动议

因为一篇刊载在《网络公民》的文章,曾在去年12月和本社总编许渊臣一同被控刑事诽谤的35岁男子迪哥达(Daniel de Costa),针对其指控作出宪法挑战(constitutional challenge)。 不过,今日法庭驳回了迪哥达的申请。在抗辩中,控方强调迪哥斯达因破坏内阁成员名誉,被控刑事诽谤。而哥斯达诽谤的指涉对象,是内阁成员,而不是内阁本身,而法官也赞同控方的立场。 迪哥达由律师拉维(M Ravi)代表辩护。拉维曾指出,他们“将质询,在刑事法典499条下“有关人士之声誉”,依据2017年上诉庭判例,只能诠释作为“自然人”(natural persons only”),那么,文章所指的“内阁”,就不能视为任何意义上的“个人”,也和新加坡宪法23和24条一致。” 宪法第23条阐述行政机构性质;24条则关乎内阁的组成。 迪哥达在去年12月12日,在刑事法典第499条文,以及第500条文下被提控。他被指控在2018年9月4日,电邮了含诽谤内阁成员内容的文章到《网络公民》。其中提及“高层腐败”(corruption at…

Two KTV lounges in Parklane mall to close due to likely ongoing COVID-19 transmission: MOH

The Ministry of Health (MOH) said on Thursday (15 July) that two…