• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
    • Volunteer
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

Population White Paper: Still not listening to us

by Terry Xu
04/02/2013
in Current Affairs
Reading Time: 4 mins read
0

TOC Editorial –

The Population White Paper published by the National Population and Talent Division could have just focused on the biggest problem that Singapore is currently facing – that of excessive immigration and our over reliance on the foreign workforce – and proposed ways to tackle that situation.

Instead, what we had was an unnecessarily complex proposal that first projects an increase in our population to 6.9 million in 2030 without proper explanation, and then compounds the problem by suggesting a slew of measures to mitigate the expected negative consequences of such an increase.

The government’s approach in writing the White Paper seems to have been this:

  1. set a GDP growth target that it wants to achieve.
  2. see how much of that can come from productivity growth.
  3. calculate how much population growth is needed, to make up the rest of the growth.
  4. figure out how much more it is willing to do to increase Singapore’s Total Fertility Rate.
  5. calculate how many immigrants are needed, to make up the rest of the population growth.
  6. figure out what policies are needed by this increased population.

It ignores the most fundamental question, which is what The Online Citizen asks: who does this type of immigration-fuelled GDP growth benefit? Does it benefit ordinary Singaporeans, or does it benefit the richer and higher-income Singaporeans and foreigners?

The answer must be crystal-clear from the last few years, where we have seen impressively high GDP growth numbers coupled with minimal improvement, if not outright deterioration, in the lives of ordinary Singaporeans.

And yet, the Government continues to insist on walking down this path, a path that Singaporeans have already very clearly and loudly said – in our votes in the 2011 General Election and the recent Punggol East by-election — that we do not want to go down anymore. So much for the Prime Minister’s promise after GE2011, to “listen carefully to different voices, understand the day-to-day difficulties and strains facing Singaporeans, address their concerns and be open to inputs on what Government can do better”.

This government, led by the ruling People’s Action Party, has evidently not changed – it still thinks that its policies are right, and it is only the way in which such policies are communicated to us that is an issue.

Since GE2011, it has held many sessions of the National Conversation, yet it would appear that our views on population growth have not been taken seriously. Our cries for a slower pace of population growth remain unheard by our political leaders. We again face the same policies that cost PAP its massive loss in votes. What an absolute waste of effort in public consultation.

Are our accusations valid? Since the White Paper was launched, TOC has received many articles and links that criticises what the White Paper puts forward. Among the comments that poured in was the view that the PAP has reneged on its promise to listen more.

For the sake of Singapore and Singaporeans, this must stop.

TOC will monitor document and summarise the positions taken by our elected representatives during the Parliament debate on the White Paper, and the final vote cast by each Member of Parliament on whether to endorse it. We will publish a summary, and encourage our readers to use it to question the actions of their MPs and push for a complete review of our long-term population policy in line with what Singaporeans really want.

We believe that setting population policy to support a GDP growth target puts the cart before the horse. Instead, we should define our population policy based on what Singaporeans want and are comfortable with for Singapore, with a fully-informed understanding of what this might mean for our GDP growth.

The PAP is fond of talking about the need to make hard choices and trade-offs. We know that Singaporeans are very capable of doing this. But the PAP is not giving us a chance to make our own choices, instead of imposing their choices upon us.

TOC believes that Singaporeans can reclaim our aspirations for our country only by holding our political leaders accountable. They need to fulfil their post-GE2011 promises, and really start to listen to the people and what we want, instead of simply telling us what is really good for us.

We need to turn this White Paper into a Green Paper, where our political leaders consult honestly and openly with the people to understand the real problems and aspirations and find the right solutions. Otherwise, this Population White Paper will push Singapore further down a path that we already know we do not want.

For just US$7.50 a month, sign up as a subscriber on The Online Citizen Asia (and enjoy ads-free experience on our site) to support our mission to transform TOC into an alternative mainstream press.
Tags: White Paper 2013

Related Posts

Community

AVA: 62 farms to be affected by land use changes

29/10/2014
Commentaries

Trust lost, trust yet to be found

16/02/2013
Commentaries

Singapore’s Economic Model – the fallacy of “growth at all costs” – Part 2

14/02/2013
Commentaries

Stop Trying to Frame the White Paper, We Can See the Truth

13/02/2013
Commentaries

Dubious footnotes in the Population White Paper

11/02/2013
Commentaries

Population growth: Losing the debate with an unsubstantiated case

08/02/2013

Latest posts

Malaysian court sentences man to 1,050 years’ jail, 24 strokes of the cane, for raping stepdaughter 105 times

Thai court jails activist for 28 years jail for royal defamation

26/01/2023
Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall

Earning only S$400 a month, delivery-rider turned hawker threw in the towel after two years of running a rojak stall

26/01/2023
KKH’s lack of continuous monitoring baby’s vital signs “was not ideal”, said State Coroner

KKH’s lack of continuous monitoring baby’s vital signs “was not ideal”, said State Coroner

26/01/2023
Dozens of COVID protesters still behind bars in China: HRW

Dozens of COVID protesters still behind bars in China: HRW

26/01/2023
8 dead, including 6 Chinese nationals, after ship sinks near Japan

8 dead, including 6 Chinese nationals, after ship sinks near Japan

26/01/2023
“党籍不会过期失效”  前进党称已就党籍终止知会卡拉

Nurse disabled permanently after vaccine injury and sacked by SGH; Did the hospital advise her to apply for VIFAP?

26/01/2023
Man and 2-year-old daughter fell into hole in bridge at Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, “seconds away from drowning”

Man and 2-year-old daughter fell into hole in bridge at Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve, “seconds away from drowning”

26/01/2023
Ruling on Trump ban marks defining moment for Facebook panel

Meta says Trump to be allowed back on Facebook, Instagram

26/01/2023

Trending posts

Ho Ching breaks silence over Temasek’s write down of its US$275 million investment in FTX, says it “can afford to be contrarian”

US regulator questions VCs’ due diligence work prior to investing in FTX; Ho Ching says Temasek can afford to be contrarian

by The Online Citizen
24/01/2023
27

...

Two Indian nationals paid about S$330 and S$730 respectively for forged certificates submitted in their S-Pass application

MOM found issuing EPs meant for foreign PMETs to PRC waitress and general worker

by Correspondent
26/01/2023
26

...

Population White Paper: Still not listening to us

by Terry Xu
04/02/2013
0

...

“党籍不会过期失效”  前进党称已就党籍终止知会卡拉

AGC asked to explain purposes of 68 private letters of inmates illegitimately forwarded to prosecutors

by The Online Citizen
21/01/2023
16

...

Indian rupee falls 60% since signing of CECA while Singapore becomes top investor in India

by Correspondent
25/01/2023
34

...

“党籍不会过期失效”  前进党称已就党籍终止知会卡拉

Has HDB flats become “more affordable” by “selling” at a shorter lease of 50-years?

by Leong Szehian
25/01/2023
18

...

February 2013
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728  
« Jan   Mar »
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen