By Ghui

There is ongoing debate between Archbishop Nicholas Chia and Function 8 on the retraction of a letter given by Archbishop Chia in support of an anti ISA rally. To muddy the waters, there is also argument on whether or not these letters should have been made public in the first place.

Given that there is a sizable number of Catholics in Singapore and the many questions in relation to Operation Spectrum that still remain unanswered, this whole saga is unsurprisingly generating great public interest.

Each party has its side to the story and Singaporeans have the right to discuss, comment and question. However, what I do not understand is why the Ministry of Home Affairs sees the need to chastise Function 8 for being “disrespectful” to Archbishop Chia?

Surely this is an issue between the Archbishop (or more broadly the Catholic Church) and the activist group. What is the government body’s role in this debacle?  Individual employees of the Ministry of Home Affairs have every freedom to express their opinions in their personal capacity but an official chastisement is certainly unnecessary. Why the government should get involved in what is essentially a private dispute boggles the mind!

Of course, this issue is now one of public concern and the government will no doubt want to be kept apprised of the situation. Be that as it may, is it the government’s role to take sides? This is not some schoolroom fight where the teacher has to step in to tell one party off for being “disrespectful”.

I can understand why the Ministry of Home Affairs would be concerned with events that could upset the religious balance in our city-state but this is hardly one of those! No religious groups are expressing inflammatory remarks nor is any party inciting religious unrest! The only tenuous connection to religion is that one of the parties is an archbishop! This is hardly about religion and raises the question of whether politics have crept into the domain of religion in what is supposed to be a secular system.

To avoid that suspicion, the Ministry of Home Affairs should not get directly involved.

You May Also Like

James Gomez: PAP is in policy inertia

~ By Kumaran Pillai ~ 1st May 2012 – The Singapore Democratic…

That “little increase” in hawker stall rental rates means “a lot” to hawkers, Makansutra founder KF Seetoh responds to NEA

Even that “little increase” in the rental rates would mean “a lot”…

MOH announces 12 new cases of locally transmitted Zika virus infection

The Ministry of Health (MOH) announced that there were another 12 new…

行动党15市镇会下月起 禁PMD在组屋底层和公共走廊使用

据了解,从下月1日起,人民行动党15个市镇理事会将禁止所有个人代步工具在组屋底层和公共走廊使用。 人民行动党市镇会协调主席张俰宾博士,在今日(7日)发文告声称,市镇会已经检讨已有条例(bylaw),一旦获得新加坡总检察署批准后,将实行新禁令。 有鉴于个人代步工具(PMD)事故频发,包括陆路交通局等各造也着手管制PMD。 在前日的国会上,交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明指出,许多国人依赖PMD出行和维持生计,但是在前两年(2017和2018年)涉及PMD的公共路径事故就多达228宗,而今年上半年也爆发了49宗涉及PMD的火患,所以采取提前措施是有必要的。 明年4月起,所有新的电动踏板车,都必须通过UL2272标准认证检查,并确保重量、宽度和车速符合规格,才能注册使用。 陆交局因电动踏板车火警事件频传,自上个月规定必须注册后,昨日宣布将强制电动个人代步工具(简称PMD)符合UL2272标准的措施提前半年实行,所有个人代步工具必须在明年7月起达到有关防火标准。 上个月起,陆交局已强制电动踏板车进行注册,惟至今已经注册的9万辆电动踏板车中,有将近九成不符合UL2272的安全标准。 相关的电动踏板车原定于2021年起就会自动注销注册,不能再公开使用了。 他指出,当局将UL2272期限提前半年,主要认为这是最早能做到的合理期限,也让零售商有更多时间引进拥有UL2272防火标准认证的足够货源。