By Ghui

There is ongoing debate between Archbishop Nicholas Chia and Function 8 on the retraction of a letter given by Archbishop Chia in support of an anti ISA rally. To muddy the waters, there is also argument on whether or not these letters should have been made public in the first place.

Given that there is a sizable number of Catholics in Singapore and the many questions in relation to Operation Spectrum that still remain unanswered, this whole saga is unsurprisingly generating great public interest.

Each party has its side to the story and Singaporeans have the right to discuss, comment and question. However, what I do not understand is why the Ministry of Home Affairs sees the need to chastise Function 8 for being “disrespectful” to Archbishop Chia?

Surely this is an issue between the Archbishop (or more broadly the Catholic Church) and the activist group. What is the government body’s role in this debacle?  Individual employees of the Ministry of Home Affairs have every freedom to express their opinions in their personal capacity but an official chastisement is certainly unnecessary. Why the government should get involved in what is essentially a private dispute boggles the mind!

Of course, this issue is now one of public concern and the government will no doubt want to be kept apprised of the situation. Be that as it may, is it the government’s role to take sides? This is not some schoolroom fight where the teacher has to step in to tell one party off for being “disrespectful”.

I can understand why the Ministry of Home Affairs would be concerned with events that could upset the religious balance in our city-state but this is hardly one of those! No religious groups are expressing inflammatory remarks nor is any party inciting religious unrest! The only tenuous connection to religion is that one of the parties is an archbishop! This is hardly about religion and raises the question of whether politics have crept into the domain of religion in what is supposed to be a secular system.

To avoid that suspicion, the Ministry of Home Affairs should not get directly involved.

You May Also Like

Minister and top management not to blame – PM Lee

Videos of PM Lee’s speech below. “I am satisfied that the Ministry…

不满未全文刊载驻美大使投书 我媒体政策司长抨击《华邮》“让虚假指控延续”

短短三周内,财政部、内政部、人力部和教育部,都透过防假消息法办事处,向在野党人物和时事网站管理人,发出更正指示。 社交媒体平台脸书(Facebook),此前也被新加坡政府要求对时政新闻网State Times Review(简称ST Review)的贴文发出更正声明。 对此,美国《华盛顿邮报》记者凯特(Cat Zakrzewki)在本月2日也作出跟进报导,指这是美国科技公司首次被要求遵循新加坡《防假消息法》,其中引述脸书发言人安迪·斯通(Andy Stone)言论:“我们希望新加坡政府保障不会影响言论自由,且有条理和透明落实该法。” 该报导也采访了人权观察组织亚洲区副主任罗伯逊(Phil Robertson),后者抨击《防假消息法》似乎旨在让那些如脸书等互联网公司,必须遵守这些滥用权利的法令,巨额罚款乃至可能入狱,都可能使得任何一家媒体公司都很难不遵守该法。 狮城驻美大使:新加坡更易面对假消息风险 不过该文章也涵括两段来自新加坡驻美大使米尔普里的言论。后者是投书到该报,阐述《防假消息法》实则在保障新加坡免于假消息的风险。…

Dr Ang Swee Chai the ‘Euro Communist’?

by: Teo Soh Lung/ Dr Ang Swee Chai, a prominent surgeon and…

Video of big group of South Asians arriving at Changi Airport is misleading, says Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore

On Thursday (6 May), The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) has…