By Leong Sze Hian

Joshua Chiang, the former Chief Editor of theonlinecitizen alerted me to the following population data.

PRs and new citizens dropped

Between 2008 and 2011, the number of permanent residents (PRs) granted plummeted by about 65%, from 79,167 to 27,521.

The number of new citizens granted dropped by 23% over the same period, from 20,513 to 15,777.

 

Overall drop or increase?

So, does the above mean that the consistent rhetoric in recent years that the influx of foreigners will be curtailed, has been met?

Well, I think to answer this question we may need closer examination of the population statistics.

Does granting less PRs mean that the influx of foreigners is being curtailed?  Maybe not, because most of the PRs granted may already be in Singapore as foreigners.  So, it may just mean that their status remain as foreigners instead of PRs.

Similarly, does granting less new citizens mean curtailing as well?  Again, maybe not, because most of the new citizens may already be in Singapore as PRs.

What is perhaps more significant to answer the question, may be the overall growth in foreigners’ statistics.

 

6 months increase 74,000 vs 12 months 80,400?

According to the analysis in the TR Emeritus Editorial “Foreign population continues to increase unabatedly after GE 2011” (Aug  21),  for the six months from June 2011 to December 2011, the number of foreigners and PRs increased from 1.926 to 2.0 million.  This is an increase of 74,000.

In contrast, the increase was 80,400 for the 12 months, from June 2010 to June 2011.

 

Rate of change of growth up 83%?

Therefore, the rate of change of growth in foreigners has actually increased by 83% (73,600 increase in 6 months compared to 80,400 increase in 12 months) on an annualised basis at the current rate of growth.

So, the answer to the original question as to whether the influx of foreigners is being curtailed, is NO!

In fact, it may be growing even faster!

Letting in more foreigners whilst granting less PRs and new citizens does not escape the fact that we are still letting in much more foreigners than before!

You May Also Like

又是个人代步工具充电引起! 后港组屋火患所幸无伤亡

昨日(5日)后港一带发生一起火灾事故,涉及与个人代步工具有关,所幸现场两名受害者仅受到惊吓,最终也未送往医院治疗。 根据民防部队文告表示,他们于昨日下午五点左右接获通报,前往后港91街第927座组屋11楼的单位。据悉火势延烧到走廊,民防部队赶紧用水桶装水将火势扑灭。 民防部队表示屋内有两名受害者,将两人救出后,两人受到惊吓,民防部队的护理人员马上为两人检查,但他们拒绝入院治疗。 从民防部队所拍摄的现场画面可见,火势已将墙壁熏黑,并且将个人代步工具烧毁。 经初步调查显示,该起火灾事故与个人代步工具有关,着火时个人代步工具正在充电,而且该个人代步工具并非使用合格标准UL2272的电源。 最后,民防部队也呼吁所有的个人代步工具的骑士应在购买有UL2272认证设备的个人代步工具。

Hotels booming in business as demands for temporary accommodation for M’sian workers increase

Hotels were one of many businesses that were impacted by the COVID-19…

陈振声驳斥 CECA没给印度国民移民我国“开方便之门”

新加坡贸工部长陈振声指出,新加坡-印度全面经济合作协定(Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement,简称CECA)并没有授予印度国民无条件进入我国,或成为我国移民的特权。 他于周末(9日)指出,“有关双边协议为国人带来了就业机会,旨在减轻经济不稳定时民众的担忧”。 在社媒和网上流传的一个说法,指CECA允许印度国民夺走我国专业人员、经理、高管和技术人员(简称PMET)的就职机会。 陈振声指出,和其他国家或地区的专才一样,印度专才也必须符合我国人力部的资格标准,才能到我国工作,或申请就业准证、S准证等。 他表示,我国自由贸易协定网络自2005年以来,已经增加了40万份就业机会,达到125万个,但是他并没有声明有关就业机会中,有多少是因为CECA而获得,也没有指出国人从中受益多少。 “我们了解且明白国人在目前的不稳定经济环境下,产生了对竞争力和就业前景的担忧。但是误导国人并不能帮助到他们,只会制造恐慌和愤怒。” “要帮助国人,首先我们要扩大企业市场,持续培训我国员工,以保持优势的竞争力。并且不让他人煽动我国的种族主义可人民恐惧,更不该因为个人私心或政治理由而如此做。” CECA放宽外劳工作证条例 然而,自CECA合约在2005年生效以来,我国在发放工作准证给印度籍员工方面都比较宽松。在CECA条约下,两国人民可以进行的事项包括了:…

Give a simple gift this christmas

As we celebrate Christmas – the time of peace, love and giving…