By Tan Jee Say

What does DPM Tharman's speech to NTU students last Wednesday tell us about the quality of PAP leadership? He had said that the bottom 20 per cent of Singapore workers have not seen any real increase in income in the last 10 years. Haven't Singaporeans known, felt and talked about this for a long time and yet it took a deputy prime minister and finance minister 10 years to know and talk about it, and only after the relevant data have been compiled and shown to him?

Long on hindsight…

He amazed us further when he said "the lesson we are learning in the world is that inclusive growth does not come naturally"(Straits Times 6 September 2012). One wonders which economic doctrine tells him that inclusive growth comes naturally and has misguided him all these years. And when he said that "Singapore's social compact cannot be left to market forces because these will only widen disparities in wealth and income", isn't this outcome to be expected of a free market economy that PAP espouses and which the history of welfare states from Bismarck's social insurance programmes in the 1880s to Beveridge's National Health Service in the 1940s, tells us about the need for Government's "sustained intervention" to provide "real opportunities" to those who start life with less? I have made similar points in a lunch with J P Morgan last year [link] What has DPM Tharman been doing all these years, from student of economics to central bank economist to finance minister? Daydreaming, he did say of his youth. Has he stopped daydreaming since?

Lunch meeting with Directors of J P Morgan Asia investment Management Trust on 6 October 2011

….Short on foresight

In an earlier posting on pre-school education [link],  I quoted DPM Tharman's comment on Singapore's low ranking in an EIU survey that "more can be done to lift the quality of pre-school education in Singapore and give everyone an equal chance early in life". (todayonline.com 30 June 2012) A day before, he had said that "the Republic must do its utmost to prevent a permanent underclass from being formed," as "… the disadvantages of one generation is (sic) very easily passed down to the children". "We must do our utmost to work against that. Do our utmost to ensure that those who start off behind have the best chance of catching up," said Mr Tharman, noting that early intervention during childhood is important."  But he was Education Minister from 2003 to 2008 and what was he doing all these 5 years about improving pre-school opportunities "to prevent a permanent underclass from being formed"? Obviously nothing much in view of Singapore's low ranking in 2012. Why? Daydreaming again? And suddenly waking up with perfect hindsight 20/20? Where is his foresight that PAP never fails to claim its leaders possess to solve problems 20 years ahead?

Wrong on facts

It is not just DPM Tharman who is full of hindsight but seriously lacking in foresight. Birds of the same feather flock together and the leader chooses his flock. Not only is PM Lee lacking in foresight, he has also not articulated any coherent vision for Singapore. Worse he got his facts wrong.

Remember his speech to the Economic Society of Singapore (ESS) 3 months ago when he so confidently and proudly proclaimed that "there is no country in the world where the population gets smaller and incomes rise at the same time"? But in my FB posting [ link],  I provided facts and figures to show that PM Lee was wrong, that there were at least 4 countries whose national income rose in 2011 while population declined, for example, Estonia's GDP grew 7.9% in 2011 even though its population fell 0.65%. In addition, 4 countries (Austria, Finland, Taiwan and S Korea) whose populations effectively stagnated as they grew only marginally, registered respectable real GDP growth rates of 2.7 to 5.2%; and these are developed, high-income economies like Singapore. If PM wanted to justify his liberal immigration policy on the basis that it was critical for economic growth, he has failed on the facts of the case which show that incomes can rise even if population gets smaller!

At the same ESS function, PM Lee had also poured cold water on the Nordic model of the welfare state. Central to the PAP argument was the outmoded belief that welfare entitlements will weaken a nation's economic competitiveness through their effect on the work ethic and through high taxes to sustain the welfare benefits. I have debunked this PAP thinking in my posting [ link] where I pointed out that the extensive social safety net of the Nordic countries has not prevented them from achieving robust economic growth and top rankings in national economic competitiveness. And their work ethic is pretty good as can be seen in their many world class companies and innovative thinkers, with Denmark alone having 13 Nobel prize winners. And the Nordic countries are the happiest countries in the world. Mind you, these are countries with extensive welfare states and high taxes!

From disdain to embrace

The facts stared starkly and rudely in PM's face; he could not deny the facts and  in less than 3 months, he and his ministers have begun to sing a different tune. PM talked about increased social spending supported by tax increases not now but in 20 years' time, DPM Tharman laid out a case for active government policies "tilted in favour of those with less" and MOS Halimah Yacob planned to visit the Nordic countries[!] to study their pre-school centres!

From disdain to embrace! What a turnaround! And in such a short span of 3 months! It just shows how weak their convictions are, their lack of foresight and their desperate clutch of new ideas that come their way. And the convening of a national conversation ostensibly to find out what Singaporeans want to be in 20 years' time, is a telling sign of the paucity of ideas in the PAP to meet the challenges of the future. Yet PAP has never hesitated to tell us that it has very competent and talented leaders with effective solutions to solve Singapore's problems. If it has the ideas and solutions which it proclaimed to possess when it sought another mandate to govern during GE2011, then this national conversation is nothing but a public relations exercise to mislead and manipulate citizens' emotions; it just goes to show how insincere the PAP has become.

Regime change – get organised

Incompetent or insincere, or both? Events in recent years have shown that the PAP is both incompetent and insincere. To save Singapore from the PAP, we have to focus on regime change, a point I made in my talk to the Rotary Club earlier this year [ link]. We do not need a national conversation to generate ideas on how to bring Singapore forward. As Lucky Tan mentioned on his blog [here], "There is no lack of ideas. That is not the problem. What is lacking is the political leadership and will to implement them." 

But the current leadership is not equal to the task – what can one expect from a PM who has no vision for the country or an ill-conceived one based on wrong facts, and a DPM who is full of hindsight but empty of foresight? The real salvation for Singapore lies outside the PAP and there are enough talent out there to form an alternative leadership team. It's time for them to come together, get organised and stand ready to take over. A regime change is long overdue.

TOC thanks Tan Jee Say for his contribution. The article first appeared on his Facebook here.

You May Also Like

SNEF President says work pass scheme provides foreign talents for SGs to spar with

In an interview last week, Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF) president Robert…

《网络公民》诚征编采人才、志工 一同记录历史时刻

为来届大选编采工作备战,《网络公民》诚征公民记者和志愿工作人员,以期能在大选进行更全面的报导。 如您认为有一技之长,想用自己的文笔、镜头记录下历史性的重要一刻,欢迎您填写以下表格,或电邮履历至 [email protected]。 我们需要方方面面的人才:记者、摄影记者、社交媒体达人、乃至交通运输,各方面都需要人手。 回溯上届选举,我们的准备工作显得仓促,未能准备足够的志工。这次我们希望能提前筹备,故此先行招募各界良才达人,报名注册后可先参与我们的筹备培训课程。 各项工作需求: 撰稿人:针对政党、候选人或公民提出的热门议题撰写评论 编辑:为文字把关校对,并确保信息无误 记者:直击现场、担任读者们的眼睛和耳朵,采访集会、拜票等选举期间进行的活动: 外勤记者- 愿意采访全岛各地区活动并回报现场访谈、事件 在地记者- 驻扎在自己的社区,拍摄、录影记录任何选举活动并报导…

“I have reconciled with the Chiams. The hatchet is buried.” – Ben Pwee

Shortly after the General Election in 2011, Benjamin Pwee left the Singapore…

受害者逾40人、5000元被卷走! 一对男女网上售金诈骗被逮

两名青年涉嫌在网上购物平台Carousell,以出售黄金珠宝首饰行骗而被逮捕。 警方于周三(5月20日)的新闻发布会上指出,嫌犯为一对19岁的男女,受骗人数超过40人,涉及金额超过5000元。 警方指出,在本月接获不少人报案,指他们被一名网上卖家欺骗了。卖家声称正在举办开斋节促销活动,在Carousell上以折扣价出售黄金首饰。然而在买家通过银行转账付费后,就再也无法联系上卖家了。 两名嫌犯是于周二落网。警方在进一步调查后,发现两人曾经向警方做出虚假投报,声称女子的个人物品遗失了,其中包括含有银行户口资料的证件。案件尚在调查中。 一旦欺诈罪名成立,他们将有可能面对不超过10年的监禁和罚款;向公务人员提供虚假情报,若罪名成立也将被判入狱不超过两年、或罚款、或两者兼施。 警方提醒民众,在网上购物时需要提高警惕,尽量避免提前付款或直接转账付款给卖家。 当局表示,欺诈分子会诱使买家直接透过交流平台和他们联系,并以更多优惠或更快速的交易服务,吸引买家通过转账服务付款,因此希望民众不要掉入类似陷阱内。 他们补充道,尤其是在进行昂贵物品交易时,消费者应该选择在交货时才付款,或选择和经授权的卖方进行交易,才更有保障。