By: Kumaran Pillai, Terry Xu & Leo Khaw

Chen (not her real name) paid S$3600 of her savings to an agent in promise of more money, better life and to escape from the communist regime of China. But now, she has found herself only the short end of the stick. She works for a meagre S$500 a month as a factory hand in Panasonic Singapore which is located in suburban Bedok. There seems to be an awful regret that she has spent her money on a lousy deal. She has learnt the hard way that her life isn’t any better in democratic Singapore either.

Similar to those in the bottom 20% of our general population here, her life in Singapore is down to mere subsistence levels. Her income of S$500 is insufficient to meet her monthly expenditure. She has worked out a frugal budget though, of $300 for food, $250 for rent and S$60 for transportation, which is $110 more than her wage.  To supplement her income, her employer has “generously” given out, in the past, additional allowance of S$150 for housing and S$30 for transportation. With a stipend of S$680, her head is just barely above water.

She works hard for the money

Chen has a three year old child and her two elderly parents to support back at home. The $60 surplus is inadequate to meet her total financial needs. She needs to work overtime.

And so, she works up to 100 hours in overtime in order to make about S$1200 a month. This is on top of the 44 hour work week, and she can end up working as many as 72 hours in a typical workweek. There are times when she does double shifts of up to sixteen hours at a stretch to meet the production targets set by the company. Nowadays, this happens at least four times a month.

The Ministry of Manpower guidelines for overtime states, “An employee can be required to work up to 12 hours a day if the employee gives his consent in writing” (here). Chen says that the workers did not give their consent in writing. The employment contract is in English, but according to Chen, no translation was made available for the Mandarin speaking workers.

Chen however, is not overly concerned about the long working hours, she is concerned that the 72 hour limit is too low and that 100 hours of overtime hours are insufficient for her to earn the extras. She is willing to work all her waking hours to make as much as she can. 

She is hopeful that hard work and determination can see her through all the hardships. She is hopeful that someday she’ll be able to break out of her poverty cycle. But for now, hope is all she has got.

Chen’s passage to Singapore

Her job agent in Hubei, China made her many promises. He told her that her she could save as much as $1200 a month and that she could become rich in no time if she were to do overtime in Singapore. So, she was asked to buy her own airline ticket and asked to pay S$3600 as agency fees before her passage to Singapore.

Chen was given a contract in Mandarin which said that she was not forced or coerced into signing it and she was going to Singapore on her own free will. She was not aware of her actual employment terms until she started work in Singapore. In fact, her current employment contract with Panasonic is in English and the company has yet to give her a Chinese translation.

When asked if she would consider coming here again, she hesitantly said in Mandarin, “I have to work close to half a year just to earn back the agent fees, of course I would think twice."

Panasonic Singapore Vs Huawel China

There were 14 others we spoke to, who had similar stories to tell. One university graduate lamented about how he was short-changed. One said that China was better, and another said that things were too expensive here. But he also said the people here were cultured and polite.

The university graduate said that Huawei China paid about S$700 – S$800 as basic pay and he could easily make up to $2000 per month doing a similar job in China. He came here thinking that he could land a white collar job and was hoping to make about $3000 a month.

Union warns employees not to speak up

The workers were warned by the Union not to speak-up, negotiate or “create trouble” for the management. They were also told that Singapore government had very strict laws and “action” would be taken against those who spoke up.

Some employees received a pay rise of S$1.00 when they became too “vocal.” Another worker received a more “generous” raise of S$7.00 after working eighteen months here. The workers feel, perhaps justifiably, that the company was merely mocking their requests for better pay.

Assembly work at Panasonic Singapore

We learnt from the workers that Panasonic Singapore does assembly of refrigerators and air-cons which are exported out of Singapore.

They speculated that Panasonic continued operating in Singapore despite the costs, because of labour laws that permitted exploitation of low wage earners and a favourable tax regime.

Is it beneath Singaporeans to work in factories?

Listening to the plight of these workers, it has become apparent to us that these low wage workers are sometimes preferred, because of the lack of support and backing from unions and the industry bodies in Singapore for such workers. A Singaporean worker, on the other hand would probably have better access, though limited and perfunctory, to unions in Singapore. 

An MP has said that most Singaporeans do not take these jobs because we Singaporeans are concerned about our dignity and often do not take up menial jobs as we do not want to lose face. Having seen the ruthless exploitation and the wages that Panasonic offers, it makes us wonder if the MP has lost touch with reality and if he seriously wants Singaporeans to work under these conditions.

The way forward

In another TOC article written by Jolovan Wham, “Exploitation of Migrant Workers = Exploitation of Low Wage Local Workers,” he has clearly shown how such exploitation can lead to depressed wage conditions in Singapore.

These foreign workers are taking a big risk by standing up and speaking up against their employer and our system.

Therein lies a lesson for Singaporeans – there are things that we can learn from them – that we will only be able to find solutions to our social ills by surfacing them in the right forums, by standing up against incompetency in whatever form it may be, and by being the agent of change.

 

 

 

You May Also Like

自由业者摄影师自揭影视圈内幕 被制作人拖欠薪酬长达四个月

一名初级摄影师Eskay Seah,在脸书上揭发他身为自由业者被欠款的可怕经历。日前他曾与名为Ignasia Incorporated Pte Ltd的制作人阿里(译名)合作,但他却未支付薪酬,结果当事人要追讨长达四个月。 事情由今年2月开始,当事人谢小姐(译名)获一名制片经理Noel(非真名)邀请,担任两周的电视剧制片助理。尽管她的职务是身为制片助理,领着较低的薪水(一天120新元而非150新元一天),但他必须身兼多职,无奈生活所迫使她接受薪水较低的工作。 文中她也表示一直都保持良好的心态,认为制片经理“为了制作更好的电视剧,或许会将钱投资在其他地方让本地广播节目得以扩展。“ 在拍摄期间,谢小姐被要求协助艺术部门和担任临时演员。此外,他也被要求拍摄幕后花絮,并在部分临时演员来到的半小时,以不支付任何赔偿下取消他们的演出(不支付任何赔偿),同时还要确保节目持续进行。据她的观察,这两项额外的工作要求都是因为人手不足造成。 她也表示,必须一个人管理逾16人的临时演员,面临巨大压力,阿里甚至开玩笑地威胁她,如果未能随传随到,及时集合这些临时演员,他不会支付谢小姐任何费用。 但是,当阿里再次表明仅支付谢小姐担任的女配角(先前为临时演员)3小时30新元的低薪酬,种种行为加上先前所受的委屈,让谢小姐极为愤怒。 她写道,阿里曾告诉他人,隔日只需要拍摄3小时,支付30新元即可,而再隔天则支付完整数额给谢小姐,确保她不会临阵逃脱,谢小姐知道后顿时火冒三丈。” “随后,我也向Noel要求,将我的薪资调整为一小时150新元,他也向我确保会考虑。随着他的要求,我将我的账单都转寄给他,以为这些荒唐事会在我的工作日最后一天,2019年2月15日结束。”她说。…

高官不满报导 《海时》政治编辑被调职? 华伦澄清乃编采室重组

《雅虎新闻》揭露,《海峡时报》政治组编辑李雪盈(译音),疑似遭高官不满其部分政治新闻报导,而在今年八月被调任财经组。 《雅虎新闻》是根据《海时》内部职员披露消息,指在一则誌期7月20日的公司内部电邮,指出李雪盈在今年8月调任财经组,其职责包括“在《周日时报》和《海时》等平台,生产原创和具影响力的新闻内容。” 《海时》总编辑华伦斐迪南斯,则在同一电邮宣布将组成新加坡新闻组。该编采组将涵盖所有本地的政治、经济和生活新闻,以“促进跨平台的紧密合作”。 目前,新加坡新闻组是由执行编辑Sumiko Tan领军。 在10月29日的一则电邮,《海时》职员则被告知,资深助理编辑Paul Jacob受委为副新闻编辑(政治),他将负责政治和国外新闻的编采工作。不过,政治组编辑至今仍悬空。 《雅虎新闻》收到两名《海时》职员(其中一名已离职)透露消息,指总编华伦是在今年7月中旬,告知政治新闻组,有关李雪盈的调任消息。 据内部消息称,李雪盈的调任原因,可能是基于高官不满她在今年5月6日的一则报导:《王乙康:没有文凭也可当总理》(“A PM without a…

新加坡华乐团将赴欧巡演

新加坡华乐团将从本月31日起至下月9日,前往欧洲德国、意大利和希腊等国,进行巡回演出。 根据华乐团官网通告,音乐总监叶聪(Tsung Yeh)将率团率先在本月31日,于德国首都柏林音乐厅演出。 9月3日,则前往布拉格鲁道夫音乐厅;9月6日在意大利弗利,以及9月9日在希腊的约阿尼纳演出。 届时演出的曲目,包括何占豪、陈钢作曲、阎惠昌、顾立民改编的《梁山伯与祝英台》,本地接触小提琴家甘宁携手演绎。 还有冯迪伦作曲的琵琶协奏曲:《狮舞弄清韵》,华乐团琵琶首席俞嘉演出;青年作曲家黄佳俊创作的《喀拉喀托火山》 、古典音乐作曲家、指挥家谭盾的作品《黄土地》,以及作曲家罗伟伦编曲的《王子与狮子》等等。  

Letter to the Attorney-General to re-open Coroner’s Inquiry for Dinesh

The family of Dinesh Raman s/o Chinnaiah, who died in Changi Prison…