By Kumaran Pillai

Kumaran Pillai, the Chief Editor of The Online Citizen spoke to Dr. James Gomez over the recent announcement that Singaporeans For Democracy’s has moved to de-register as an ROS society and the launch of its report next week.

 

Dr. James Gomez
Why did Singaporeans For Democracy choose to de-register?

SFD’s membership chose to dissolve the society to draw attention to two sets of rules that hinder its work as a political association in Singapore. One set of laws pertain to the registration and the day-to-day operation of SFD. These laws are found in the Societies Act, Political Donations Act and Broadcasting Act. The other set of laws pertain to the operation of SFD’s program of activities. These laws are the, Films Act, Public Order Act and several others. The report entitled “Democracy and Civil Society in Singapore: The Politics of Control” will enumerate in detail how these have affected our work in the last two years. The upcoming report authored by Roderick Chia will be launched at 10am on 25 August 2012. The event is free, free copies of the report will be available then and all are welcome. See this link for event details:

 

What is involved in de-registering SFD?

Dissolving a society registered with the Registrar of Society involves the following steps. First, you need to hold a General Meeting of the membership to decide on the dissolution. SFD did this on 28 April 2012 and got the approval of its membership. Second, some forms need to be completed and a series of documents needs to be compiled such as minutes of the meeting and financial statements and these have to be submitted to ROS. SFD has now complied all the relevant documents and plans to submit these documents to the ROS in the next days. Third, once the ROS has validated these documents it will officially finalize the dissolution.

 

What will happen once SFD is officially “dissolved” by the Registrar of Societies?

While the SFD’s dissolution is being processed by ROS, we will update our website one last time to upload the SFD report “Democracy and Civil Society in Singapore: The Politics of Control” so that it is also available online. But once the dissolution is processed and finalized, SFD as a society under the ROS, will cease to exist and operate. However, SFD’s Facebook Page with its over 800 members will remain and continue to be a platform for the page members to continue posting and sharing information on civil society and politics in Singapore. We welcome, the phrase Singaporeans For Democracy to be appropriated by Singaporeans to continue their work on civil and political reform.

 

What will happen to SFD’s members?

Our members were already active in civil society when they came together to set up SFD. Even during their time with SFD our members were concurrently involved in other initiatives. As such it will be business as usual for our members as they continue their contributions in Singapore’s civil society landscape.

 

So what are your personal plans after SFD?

At the moment, I am busy supervising the completion of the SFD report and its release later next week. I will continue to contribute to civil society as there is still a lot of work to bedone, however the manner and approach of contribution I will decide after the launch and dissolution.

 

So what can we expect to see in the Report next week?

The report will chronicle the history of the first and second generation political associations and the evolution of civil society related laws in contemporary Singapore. It will contain never before published correspondences to the Internal Security Department and exchanges with the Elections Department. There will also be an analysis of local media coverage of SFD and a projection on the future of political associations in Singapore. There will also be a section on recommendations for legal reform to improve the functioning of civil society in Singapore.

You May Also Like

Lawyer for Yong Vui Kong urges Malaysia Parliament to appeal to ICJ

Joshua Chiang/ At a press conference inside the Malaysian Houses of Parliament…

脸书留言被举报 警方传召国大学者问话

新加坡国立大学建筑系客座教授郑庆顺,于今午被警方传召问话,要他针对脸书一则贴文解释其动机。有者针对他在上月15日,一张亚美尼亚种族屠杀纪念馆照片中的图片说明而报警。 有关贴文乃是郑庆顺针对阿美尼亚种族屠杀纪念馆有感而发,提到该馆纪念1911年150万名亚美尼亚基督徒被土耳其鄂图曼,要求改教而被迫害。 就有名为阿扎哈里阿里的网民留言,批评他对“伊斯兰教作出不公平描述”,即便郑庆顺并无此意图。 郑庆顺在个人脸书贴文,提及因此事被警方传召的经历。他说,他向警方解释,其贴文属学术教育性质的,在与阿扎哈里的对话中,他也已阐明,不能仅从字面上去理解任何宗教的神圣文本,也需考量到当下的社会情景和时局,才能避免断章取义。 不过,他不确定报案者是否与阿扎哈里有关联。 “勿滥用法律对付理性学术讨论” 他说,在口供中,他也要求警察总长和国家内政部长,阐明和确立回应公众投诉的准则,“如果投诉具有显著重要,例如可能引发暴力或社会动荡,确实应立即采取行动。但若只是个人之间的小小不愉快,应该可以理性地解决。” 相对而言,只因为有些人不同意您的看法, 就造成了个人的不便。也是新加坡建筑师学会前主席的郑庆顺表示遗憾,报案者滥用警力来打击意见不同人士,他只希望法律不会被一小撮人当作针对理性学术讨论的武器,只因为他们的感受被冒犯了。现代新加坡应该足够成熟去接受各种强力而真挚的论述。 不过,他表示负责调查警方态度专业。

PM Lee: Gov’t pays officials according to their worth, otherwise would compromise the quality of civil service

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had a conversation with American philanthropist and…